Literature DB >> 34000019

Foot Posture and Plantar Loading With Ankle Bracing.

Laura C Dickerson1, Robin M Queen1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Arch height is one important aspect of foot posture. An estimated 20% of the population has pes planus and 20% has pes cavus. These abnormal foot postures can alter lower extremity kinematics and plantar loading and contribute to injury risk. Ankle bracing is commonly used in sport to prevent these injuries, but no researchers have examined the effects of ankle bracing on plantar loading.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of ankle braces on plantar loading during athletic tasks.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 36 participants (11 men, 25 women; age = 23.1 ± 2.5 years, height = 1.72 ± 0.09 m, mass = 66.3 ± 14.7 kg) were recruited for this study. INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed walking, running, and cutting tasks in 3 bracing conditions: no brace, lace-up ankle-support brace, and semirigid brace. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We analyzed the plantar-loading variables of contact area, maximum force, and force-time integral for 2 midfoot and 3 forefoot regions and assessed the displacement of the center of pressure. A 3 × 3 mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the effects of brace and foot type (α = .05).
RESULTS: Foot type affected force measures in the middle (P range = .003-.047) and the medial side of the foot (P range = .004-.04) in all tasks. Brace type affected contact area in the medial midfoot during walking (P = .005) and cutting (P = .01) tasks, maximum force in the medial and lateral midfoot during all tasks (P < .001), and force-time integral in the medial midfoot during all tasks (P < .001). Portions of the center-of-pressure displacement were affected by brace wear in both the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions (P range = .001-.049).
CONCLUSIONS: Ankle braces can be worn to redistribute plantar loading. Additional research should be done to evaluate their effectiveness in injury prevention. © by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle brace; center of pressure; foot type

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34000019      PMCID: PMC8130767          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-164-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  26 in total

Review 1.  Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods.

Authors:  Mohsen Razeghi; Mark Edward Batt
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Arch structure and injury patterns in runners.

Authors:  D S Williams; I S McClay; J Hamill
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 3.  Association between foot type and lower extremity injuries: systematic literature review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jasper W K Tong; Pui W Kong
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Foot posture is associated with kinematics of the foot during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet.

Authors:  Andrew K Buldt; Pazit Levinger; George S Murley; Hylton B Menz; Christopher J Nester; Karl B Landorf
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment.

Authors:  A H Franco
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1987-05

Review 6.  The relationship between foot posture and plantar pressure during walking in adults: A systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew K Buldt; Jamie J Allan; Karl B Landorf; Hylton B Menz
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Arch-Taping Techniques for Altering Navicular Height and Plantar Pressures During Activity.

Authors:  Tim Newell; Janet Simon; Carrie L Docherty
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Differences in plantar loading between training shoes and racing flats at a self-selected running speed.

Authors:  Johannes I Wiegerinck; Jennifer Boyd; Jordan C Yoder; Alicia N Abbey; James A Nunley; Robin M Queen
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Arch height index measurement system: establishment of reliability and normative values.

Authors:  Robert J Butler; Howard Hillstrom; Jinsup Song; Christine J Richards; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

Review 10.  Foot characteristics in association with inversion ankle injury.

Authors:  Katherine E Morrison; Thomas W Kaminski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.