Songbai Zhang1, Vega Lloveras1,2, Silvia Lope-Piedrafita2,3, Pilar Calero-Pérez2,4, Shuang Wu4, Ana Paula Candiota2,4,5, José Vidal-Gancedo1,2. 1. Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona, ICMAB-CSIC; Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain. 2. CIBER de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Campus UAB, 08913 Bellaterra, Spain. 3. Servei de Ressonància Magnètica Nuclear, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain. 4. Departament de Bioquímica i Biologia Molecular, Unitat de Bioquímica de Biociències, Edifici Cs, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain. 5. Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Abstract
Simultaneously being a nonradiative and noninvasive technique makes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) one of the highly required imaging approaches for the early diagnosis and follow-up of tumors, specifically for brain cancer. Paramagnetic gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents (CAs) are the most widely used ones in brain MRI acquisitions with special interest when assessing blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, a characteristic of high-grade tumors. However, alternatives to Gd-based contrast agents (CAs) are highly required to overcome their established toxicity. Organic radicals anchored on a dendrimer macromolecule surface (radical dendrimers) are promising alternatives since they also exhibit paramagnetic properties and can act as T1 CAs like Gd-based CAs while being organic species (mitigating concerns about toxic metal accumulation). Here, we studied the third generation of a water-soluble family of poly(phosphorhydrazone) radical dendrimers, with 48 PROXYL radical units anchored on their branches, exploring their potential of ex vivo and in vivo contrast enhancement in brain tumors (in particular, of immunocompetent, orthotopic GL261 murine glioblastoma (GB)). Remarkably, this radical species provides suitable contrast enhancement on murine GL261 GB tumors, which was comparable to that of commercial Gd-based CAs (at standard dose 0.1 mmol/kg), even at its 4 times lower administered dose (0.025 mmol/kg). Importantly, no signs of toxicity were detected in vivo. In addition, it showed a selective accumulation in brain tumor tissues, exhibiting longer retention within the tumor, which allows performing imaging acquisition over longer time frames (≥2.5 h) as opposed to Gd chelates. Finally, we observed high stability of the radicals in biological media, on the order of hours instead of minutes, characteristic of the isolated radicals. All of these features allow us to suggest that the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer could be a viable alternative to metal-based MRI contrast agents, particularly on MRI analysis of GB, representing, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of organic radical species used for this purpose and one of the very few examples of these types of radical species working as MRI CAs in vivo.
Simultaneously being a nonradiative and noninvasive technique makes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) one of the highly required imaging approaches for the early diagnosis and follow-up of tumors, specifically for brain cancer. Paramagnetic gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents (CAs) are the most widely used ones in brain MRI acquisitions with special interest when assessing blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, a characteristic of high-grade tumors. However, alternatives to Gd-based contrast agents (CAs) are highly required to overcome their established toxicity. Organic radicals anchored on a dendrimer macromolecule surface (radical dendrimers) are promising alternatives since they also exhibit paramagnetic properties and can act as T1 CAs like Gd-based CAs while being organic species (mitigating concerns about toxic metal accumulation). Here, we studied the third generation of a water-soluble family of poly(phosphorhydrazone) radical dendrimers, with 48 PROXYL radical units anchored on their branches, exploring their potential of ex vivo and in vivo contrast enhancement in brain tumors (in particular, of immunocompetent, orthotopic GL261 murine glioblastoma (GB)). Remarkably, this radical species provides suitable contrast enhancement on murine GL261 GB tumors, which was comparable to that of commercial Gd-based CAs (at standard dose 0.1 mmol/kg), even at its 4 times lower administered dose (0.025 mmol/kg). Importantly, no signs of toxicity were detected in vivo. In addition, it showed a selective accumulation in brain tumor tissues, exhibiting longer retention within the tumor, which allows performing imaging acquisition over longer time frames (≥2.5 h) as opposed to Gd chelates. Finally, we observed high stability of the radicals in biological media, on the order of hours instead of minutes, characteristic of the isolated radicals. All of these features allow us to suggest that the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer could be a viable alternative to metal-based MRI contrast agents, particularly on MRI analysis of GB, representing, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of organic radical species used for this purpose and one of the very few examples of these types of radical species working as MRI CAs in vivo.
Magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) is one of the most versatile and
widely used clinical diagnostic tools nowadays. MRI provides images
of soft tissue anatomy in excellent detail, with high spatial resolution,
unlimited penetration depth, long effective imaging window, rapid in vivo imaging acquisition, and the absence of ionizing
radiation. Accordingly, MRI is largely used for noninvasive diagnosis
of tumors, as well as following-up response to therapy or relapse
in several organs, but it is especially useful in brain tumors. Brain
cancer is one of the most lethal and difficult-to-treat cancers. Surgical
resection is the main approach for tumor mass reduction in brain cancer
treatment; thus, it is of paramount importance in precise tumor localization
and delineation.Gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents (CAs)
are the most widely
used ones in brain MRI acquisitions for improving the intrinsic contrast
enhancement and assessing blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity,
which is a relevant feature in aggressive brain tumors such as glioblastomas
(GBs), a high-grade glial tumor with overall survival below 18 months.Gd-based CAs are categorized as mainly T1 CAs, also referred to as “positive” contrast agents,
leading to an increased (brighter) signal in T1-weighted images. They present high relaxivities due to the
high spin of the paramagnetic Gd(III) ion, which possesses seven unpaired
electrons (spin 7/2).[1] These CAs have historically
been considered safe, but for more than a decade, they have been associated
with potentially lethal nephrogenic systemic fibrosis.[2−4] Moreover, recent reports have emerged regarding the accumulation
of residual toxic Gd(III) ions in the brain and other organs from
patients with an intact blood–brain barrier after the administration
of such Gd-based CAs.[5,6] Since the use of CAs as cancer
diagnosis agents in MRI is essential for cancer treatment, in particular
for glioblastoma, it is critical to find alternative imaging probes
that provide the same or even better paramagnetic properties of current
Gd-based CAs.Nitroxides (or nitroxyl radicals) such as PROXYL
or (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl
(TEMPO) radicals are stable organic paramagnetic species possessing
unpaired electrons having the ability to provide imaging contrast
by shortening the T1 relaxation of water
in a manner analogous to paramagnetic Gd3+. In fact, they
have been investigated as T1 CAs for MRI[7−10] and have been shown to be nontoxic in vivo.[11,12] However, they have two major limitations. On the one hand, nitroxides
present inherent low water 1H relaxivity since they possess
only one unpaired electron (spin 1/2), and, on the other hand, they
are rapidly reduced in vivo (half-lives on the order
of minutes) to diamagnetic hydroxylamines, hence losing their contrast
ability and making them ineffective as contrast agents shortly after
injection.[13−16]One strategy to achieve higher molecular relaxivity and protection
against reduction is through the anchoring of many nitroxide units
to a conventional linear polymer or a hyperbranched polymer,[17−21] where the relatively low relaxivity per nitroxide is multiplied
by the number of bounded nitroxides and a protective shield effect
can be provided to the radicals. Dendrimers could be excellent scaffold
candidates for the anchoring of radicals since they are a specific
type of polymers characterized by strict control over their structure,
making them nearly perfect monodisperse macromolecules. Besides, they
present multifunctionality, globular structure and tunable size (through
different generations). It is important to highlight that the control
over the size of the dendrimers opens the opportunity to modulate
their distribution profile in the body, which is not feasible in the
case of Gd chelates. Only few reports describe the functionalization
of dendrimers with organic radicals (radical dendrimers), with most
of them being devoted to studying their electronic, magnetic, or structural
properties and only a few of them devoted to MRI CA applications.[22−24] Still, very little has been reported about their real behavior in vivo, remaining a crucial challenging goal. To the best
of our knowledge, there are only two examples of in vivo studies using radical dendrimers and very few reports using other
types of macromolecular polynitroxides. Despite the low solubility
in water of the third-generation poly(propylenimine) (PPI) dendrimers
conjugated with nitroxides, their intra-articular administration to
rabbit stifle joints produced significant enhancement of the articular
cartilage in T1-weighted images.[22] On the other hand, biodistribution studies were
performed with PPI dendrimers conjugated with spirocyclohexyl nitroxides
and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) chains, providing selectively enhanced
magnetic resonance imaging in mice for over 1 h.[23] Only more recently, another kind of macromolecular polynitroxide,
not based on dendrimers but on polymers or polymeric nanoparticles,
has shown interesting properties as MRI CA. For example, nitroxide-functionalized
brush-arm star polymer organic radical contrast agents (BASP-ORCAs)
have shown extremely high r2 relaxivity
and accumulation in murine subcutaneous tumors (A459 tumor-bearing
NCR-NU mice) for a long time following systemic administration.[17] Linear and cross-linked poly(carboxylate ester)
PEG-modified PROXYL systems were used to provide MR imaging contrast
enhancement to breast cancer tumors.[18] In
addition, amphiphilic poly(ethylene glycol)-b-polycarbonate-based
diblock copolymers containing pendant persistent PROXYL radicals were
locally administered in the hindlimb muscle of a female C57BL/6J mouse.[18] Finally, when adult female BALB/c nude mice
bearing subcutaneous tumors of HeLa cells in their back were intravenously
injected with polyacetylenes containing TEMPO and PEG, the MRI signal
intensity significantly increased in the tumor parenchyma.[20] Nevertheless, none of these studies describe
MRI performance in orthotopic glioblastoma.While dendrimer-based
magnetic resonance imaging agents decorated
with Gd have been reported for brain cancer,[25] nothing has been described with metal-free organic water-soluble
radical dendrimers.In some recent works, we have proposed the
use of radical dendrimers[26,27] as a suitable alternative
to Gd-based CAs.[24,28] In general, one of the main drawbacks
of organic macromolecules
such as dendrimers is their low water solubility, especially for large
dendrimer generations. One of our proposals was an innovative strategy
to increase water solubility and, at the same time, to obtain a full
radical functionalization of branches. By using amino acids as linkers
between the dendrimer branches and the radicals we obtained four generations
of poly(phosphorhydrazone) (PPH)-based Gn-Tyr-PROXYL
(n = 0, 1, 2, 3) radical dendrimers fully soluble
in water and completely functionalized with 6, 12, 24, and 48 PROXYL
radicals, respectively.[28] We demonstrated
that such radical dendrimers offered the pendant radicals higher stability
(in vitro) against reduction with ascorbate ions
and showed negligible in vitro cytotoxicity, demonstrating
that they could be excellent candidates to be used as MRI contrast
agents suitable for biomedical applications. However, the assessment
of their in vivo properties such as stability and
toxicity along with biodistribution and MRI studies was still lacking
on tumor-bearing mice, and this is essential to consider them as plausible
alternatives to Gd-based CA.In the present work, we have explored
the ex vivo and in vivo MRI potential
characteristics of the
highest generation of that family of radical dendrimers, G3-Tyr-PROXYL,
as MRI contrast agents in immunocompetent, orthotopic GL261 murine
glioblastoma. The in vivo toxicity and stability
were also assessed. The G3 generation was the compound of choice for
these studies since it showed the highest relaxivity and a larger
molecular size. We have synthesized the corresponding sodium salt
derivative instead of the previously reported lithium salt derivative
to improve biocompatibility and safety.
Experimental
Section
Synthesis
The synthesis of G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa was carried
out following the procedure previously described by us, with little
modifications.[28]
G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa
Under dark conditions, G3-Tyr-PROXYL-OMe[28] (110 mg, 4.17 μmol, 1 equiv) was added
into a round-bottomed flask equipped with a stir bar and dissolved
in 2 mL of tetrahydrofuran (THF). NaOH (129 mg, 3.0 mmol, 720 equiv)
was dissolved in 2 mL of Milli-Q water and transferred to the THF
solution of G3-Try-PROXYL-OMe. The reaction mixture was allowed to
stir at room temperature overnight. Afterward, THF was removed under
a vacuum, and the aqueous solution was purified by dialysis (MWCO,
0.1–0.5 kDa) to remove the excess NaOH. The external water
was changed after 2, 4, 21, and 46 h. Then, the aqueous solution of
the dialysis bag was collected and the water was eliminated by freeze-drying
to afford the final product G3-Try-PROXYL-ONa as a pale-yellow solid
in 67% yield. The full radical substitution was quantitatively characterized
by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and its purity by size exclusion
chromatography (SEC) (see the Supporting information).
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
N-(tert-Butoxycarbonyl)-l-tyrosine methyl ester (Boc-Tyr-OMe),
Cs2CO3, 3-carboxy-PROXYL, 1-[bis(dimethylamino)methylene]-1H-1,2,3-triazolo[4,5-b]pyridinium 3-oxid
hexafluorophosphate (HATU), N,N-diisopropylethylamine
(DIPEA), and NaOH were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Trifluoracetic
acid (TFA) was obtained from EMD Millipore. CH2Cl2 and CHCl3 were distillated from CaH2. Tetrahydrofuran
(THF) was distillated from Na/benzophenone. Ultrafiltration was performed
on solvent-resistant stirred cells from EMD Millipore with regenerated
cellulose membranes (3, 5, and 10 kDa) and dialysis with a dialysis
kit (MWCO 100–500 Da, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Ultrapure
water (Milli-Q, EMD Millipore) was used for ultrafiltration (together
with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade acetone)
and dialysis.
Animals
GL261 mouse glioma cells
were obtained from
the Tumour Bank Repository at the National Cancer Institute (Frederick,
Maryland). Cells were checked for the mouse short tandem repeat (STR)
profile as well as interspecies contamination. In addition, polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) studies were performed to discard mycoplasma
and virus presence. All studies involving animals were approved by
the local ethics committee (Comissió d’Ètica
en Experimentació Animal i Humana, CEEAH), according
to regional and state legislations (protocol references CEA-OH-9685/CEEAH-3665).
Mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (l’Abresle,
France) and housed at the animal facility of the Universitat
Autònoma de Barcelona. GL261 tumors were induced in
a total of 10C57BL/6 female wild-type (wt) mice by intracranial stereotactic
injection of 105 GL261 cells as already described by us,[30] and the n = 7 mice with most homogeneous tumor
volumes were chosen for further studies. Mice were weighed twice a
week, and tumor volumes were followed up using T2-weighted image (T2w) MRI acquisitions.
In addition, wt mice were used for studies such as ex vivo, biodistribution and tolerability (described in the corresponding
sections). Overall, a total of n = 27 C57BL/6 mice (weighing 19.43
± 1.46 g, aged 12 weeks) were used in this study.
Size
Exclusion Chromatography (SEC)
Size exclusion
chromatography (SEC) analysis was carried out using an Agilent 1260
infinity II liquid chromatography system apparatus equipped with a
diode array detector. For the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa dendrimer, a PSS Suprema
precolumn (10 μm, 8 × 50 mm2) and a PSS Suprema
analytical column (10 μm, 100 Å, 8 × 300 mm2) were used. LiCl 0.25 mM in water was used as the eluent at a flow
rate of 0.35 mL/min at 35 °C. The dendrimer was dissolved in
the eluent to reach a final concentration of 1 mg/mL dendrimer and
filtered through a 0.2 μm nylon filter before injection.
Electron
Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (EPR)
Electronic paramagnetic
resonance spectroscopy (EPR) spectra were
obtained with an X-Band (9.7 GHz) Bruker ELEXSYS 500 spectrometer
equipped with a ST8911 microwave cavity, a Bruker variable-temperature
unit, a field frequency lock system Bruker ER 033 M and equipped with
an NMR Gaussmeter Bruker ER 035 M. The modulation amplitude was kept
well below the line width, and the microwave power was well below
saturation. All liquid samples were previously degassed with Ar. A
quantitative EPR study was performed for G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa under the
same conditions and at the same concentration as for G0- to G3-Tyr-PROXYL-OLi,[28] comparing the corresponding double integration
value of the EPR spectrum with those of the former ones, resulting
in an area matching the full radical substitution. EPR spectra of
urine were carried out in a quartz flat cell, and the different organ
tissues were analyzed using a quartz tissue cell. Previously,
tissue organs were weighed in an analytical balance.
Endotoxin
Determination
The endotoxin determination
of the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa sample was performed by the ICTS–NANBIOSIS,
more specifically by the U20/FVPR at the Vall d’Hebron Institute
of Research (VHIR), using the limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) chromogenic
method (A39553 de Pierce).
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Studies
Magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) studies were carried out at the joint NMR facility of
the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and
CIBER-BBN (Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain), Unit 25 of NANBIOSIS
ICTS (https://www.nanbiosis.es/portfolio/u25-nmr-biomedical-application-i/). MRI studies were performed in a 7.0 T horizontal-bore superconducting
magnet (BioSpec 70/30; Bruker BioSpin, Ettlingen, Germany) equipped
with actively shielded gradients (B-GA12 gradient coil inserted into
a B-GA20S gradient system). For mouse brain MRI, a 72 mm inner-diameter
linear volume coil was used as the transmitter, and a dedicated mouse
brain quadrature surface coil was used as the receiver. For whole-body
MRI, a 72 mm inner-diameter quadrature volume coil was used as the
transceiver. MR data were acquired and processed on a Linux computer
using Paravision 5.1 software (Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany).Solutions of gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA, Magnevist) and
the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer were prepared in a saline
solution (NaCl 0.9%, B. Braun), and the injection volume was adjusted
according to mice weight.
Animal Experimental Design
Tolerability
and biodistribution
studies were performed in healthy (nontumor-bearing) C57BL/6 female
mice. Since contrast-enhancement explorations are not expected to
be repeated and cumulative, these studies were performed with single-dose
administrations. For biodistribution studies, a 0.00625 mmol/kg dosage
was used, with the objective of assessing the main organs related
to G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer metabolization through MRI
studies, which is not expected to vary for different doses. However,
tolerability studies were performed with the same dosage foreseen
to be used in the dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
(DCE-MRI) studies with the objective to ensure that no harmful effect
was observed, at least with C57BL/6 healthy female mice.MRI
studies for assessing brain tumor contrast enhancement were performed
with GL261 GB-bearing mice. Contrast agent administration (both the
G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer and the Gd-based commercial CA)
was done intravenously under anesthesia. The MRI exploration was performed,
and animals were allowed to recover in a warm environment. Mice were
euthanized after the whole procedure was finished.
MRI Studies
Ex
Vivo Brain MRI Studies
The CAs
for ex vivo studies were dissolved in a saline solution
(0.9% NaCl, B. Braun). The amount finally used for each mouse was
5 nmol of Gd dissolved in 4 μL of saline solution and 1.25 nmol
of G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer. Mice were euthanized by cervical
dislocation and immobilized on a stereotactic holder (Kopf Instruments,
Tujunga, California). The contrast administration was carried out
as described for tumor generation, with three injection points as
previously described.[31] The whole process
of CA injection ex vivo took 30 min.All imaging
studies started with T2-weighted MRI screening
with high-resolution coronal T2w images
using a rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) sequence
to evaluate brain tumor presence and to monitor its evolution stage.
The acquisition parameters for MRI studies were as follows: repetition
time (TR)/effective echo time (TEeff) = 4200:36 ms; echo
train length (ETL) = 8; field of view (FOV) = 19.2 × 19.2 mm2; matrix size (MTX) = 256 × 256 (75 μm/pixel ×
75 μm/pixel); slice thickness (ST) = 0.5 mm; inter-ST = 0.1
mm; number of slices (NS) = 10; number of averages (NA) = 4; and total
acquisition time (TAT) = 6 min and 43 s.T1-weighted MRI: A multispin–multiecho
(MSME) sequence was used with FOV = 17.6 × 17.6 mm2; MTX = 128 × 128 matrix (138 μm/pixel × 138 μm/pixel);
TR/TEeff = 200:8.5 ms; number of repetitions (NR) = 1;
and TAT = 4 min 16 s.
In Vivo MRI Studies
Mice anesthesia
was performed with isoflurane (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) at 0.5–1.5%
in O2, and the respiratory frequency was maintained between
40 and 60 breaths/min. Body temperature was maintained with a recirculating
water system incorporated in the animal bed and measured with a rectal
probe. Respiration rate and temperature were constantly monitored
(SA Instruments, Inc., New York). Before immobilization in the animal
holder, each mouse was cannulated in the tail vein using a home-built
multidelivery polyethylene tubing system. In this case, a 30G two-way
catheter was connected through polyethylene tubing, to two independent
1 mL syringes (Becton–Dickinson S.A., Madrid, Spain) loaded
with heparinized-saline (40 U/mL) (0.9% NaCl, B. Braun and heparin,
Mayne Pharma España, Madrid, Spain).
Brain
The T2- and T1-weighted
MRI were performed with the same
parameters as described for ex vivo MRI.T1 maps were performed with the RARE-VTR sequence
with FOV = 17.6 × 19.28 mm2; MTX = 128 × 128
matrix (138 μm/pixel × 150 μm/pixel); Teff = 7.5
ms and TR list: 100, 400, 700, 1000, 1300, 1700, 2000, 2600, 3500,
and 5000 ms. NR = 1, TAT = 19 min 31s.
DCE-MRI Studies
The contrast agent was injected into
the mice as a bolus (72–84 μL, doses varied according
to the CA ranging from 0.00625 to 0.1 mmol/kg) during dynamic contrast-enhanced
(DCE)-T1 MRI studies. Three glioma-bearing
mice were injected with gadoterate meglumine, and another three were
injected with G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa. A DCE T1 study was then performed using three coronal sections. For this,
an MSME sequence was used with FOV = 17.6 × 17.6 mm2; MTX = 128 × 128 matrix (138 μm/pixel × 138 μm/pixel);
TR/TE = 200:8.5 ms; ST = 1 mm; NA = 2; NR = 70; TAT = 59 min 44 s.
The contrast bolus was administered after the third repetition of
the complete T1-weighted sequence (about
2.5 min after the start of the image acquisition protocol). DCE-MRI
data were analyzed with DCE-@urLAB (http://oa.upm.es/28901/).
Body
T1-weighted images
were acquired using a respiratory gated spin echo sequence (repetition
time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 600:10.5 ms) acquiring 23 coronal sections
with a field of view = 10 × 5 cm2, matrix size = 512
× 256, and slice thickness of 1 mm with a 0.1 mm gap between
slicesT2- and T1-weighted scout images were initially performed to be
used as reference images for prescribing the final coronal sections
through the main organs of interest (kidneys, liver, bladder, muscle,
spleen). Afterward, DCE-T1w images and T1 map respiration gated acquisitions were performed
before and after contrast agent injection. For whole-body DCE-T1w, an MSME sequence was used with FOV = 9 ×
3 cm2; MTX = 256 × 128 matrix; TR/TE = 400:10 ms;
NA = 2; ST = 1 mm with 0.2 mm gap between slices; TAT = 1 min 42 s.T1 maps were performed on the same
sections as DCE-T1w images using a RARE-VTR
sequence with FOV = 9 × 3 cm2; MTX = 128 × 128
matrix, TE = 7.5 ms; and TR list: 250, 400, 800, 1300, 1700, 2400,
and 3500 ms. NR = 1; TAT = 11 min 2 s. T1 map acquisitions were used to calculate T1 values, drawing ROIs in defined zones and measuring the estimated T1 before and after CA administration, further
expressed as a percentage change.
Data Availability
The raw/processed data required to
reproduce these findings will be available under reasonable request
to corresponding author(s).
Results and Discussion
First, we synthesized the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-OMe
radical dendrimer derivative following the procedure already described
in the literature by us.[28]Then,
the methyl ester was hydrolyzed with NaOH in THF/H2O (1:1),
resulting in the water-soluble G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa dendrimer. The excess
NaOH was removed by dialysis to purify the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa dendrimer,
henceforth referred to as the G3 radical dendrimer (Figure ). The full functionalization
of the G3 dendrimer with radicals was confirmed by EPR, and its purity
was monitored by SEC (see the Supporting Information).
Figure 1
Structure of the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer.
Structure of the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer.
Ex Vivo MRI Analysis
We followed an ex vivo method developed to select CAs with a suitable potential
for in vivo efficiency using small amounts of compounds
and minimum animal use.[31] Note that these
analyses are not intended to set the amount of CA to be administered in vivo but rather to investigate whether some aspects of
the tumor environment (not possible to be evaluated in vitro) could modify/modulate the ability of CA to produce contrast enhancement.
A setup experiment with gadopentetate dimeglumine was performed for
comparison purposes, using 5 nmol of gadopentetate dimeglumine to
each injection point in the brain parenchyma. The relative contrast
enhancement (RCE) was calculated, achieving a value of 232% ±
29, n = 3, and in agreement with previous ex vivo experiments with similar Gd-based contrast agents.
The resulting T1-weighted MRI is shown
in Figure b.
Figure 2
(a) Schematic
representation of the region of interest (ROI) selection
(blue circles) for analysis in T1-weighted
MRI, indicating ipsilateral ROIs where CA are injected (right) and
contralateral ROIs (left). T1-weighted
MRI after ex vivo administration of (b) 5 nmol of
gadopentetate dimeglumine to each injection point and (c) 1.25 nmol
of the G3 radical dendrimer at each injection point.
(a) Schematic
representation of the region of interest (ROI) selection
(blue circles) for analysis in T1-weighted
MRI, indicating ipsilateral ROIs where CA are injected (right) and
contralateral ROIs (left). T1-weighted
MRI after ex vivo administration of (b) 5 nmol of
gadopentetate dimeglumine to each injection point and (c) 1.25 nmol
of the G3 radical dendrimer at each injection point.After a first trial using 0.1 nmol of the G3 radical dendrimer,
which only produced a faint relative contrast enhancement, the final
administered amount that produced a noticeable relative contrast enhancement
in T1w MRI was found to be 1.25 nmol of
G3. With this administered amount, a clear enhancement was observed
(Figure c). The corresponding
calculated relative contrast enhancement was 237% ± 40, n = 3, which meant no significant differences compared with
RCE calculated for 5 nmol Gd, suggesting that this concentration was
enough to get comparable RCE, at least in the ex vivo environment.We also investigated whether RCE presented significant
changes
along time due to possible radical inactivation. This was a first
attempt to assess the stability of the radical dendrimer in a real
biological medium, with a view to its use in vivo. The first T1w MRI was acquired 31 min
after injection (the shorter timeframe feasible considering the experimental
setup). In this first acquisition, the measured RCE was 237% ±
40. After this first T1w acquisition,
quantitative T1 maps were acquired, followed
by sequential T1w MRI until 111 min post
the first injection (Figure S2), and RCE
values were accordingly measured (Figure ). Although the values tended to be slightly
lower in the last time points analyzed, the overall RCE variation
did not present statistical significance when the different time points
were compared (p always > 0.05). Thus, the stability
of the radicals anchored to the dendrimer scaffold seemed quite prolonged
in time in such a biological medium, presenting a similar RCE well
beyond 1 h after injection. These data were encouraging for its subsequent
use in vivo, since, as explained above, one of the
main limitations of nitroxides is their rapid bioreduction.
Figure 3
RCE% time-course
curve (left) and data (right) obtained from the
quantification of T1w MRI images. The
curve displays the average RCE obtained along the time after ex vivo administration of 1.25 nmol G3 radical dendrimer.
Bars show ± SD.
RCE% time-course
curve (left) and data (right) obtained from the
quantification of T1w MRI images. The
curve displays the average RCE obtained along the time after ex vivo administration of 1.25 nmol G3 radical dendrimer.
Bars show ± SD.T1 values after the G3 radical dendrimer
local injection were also assessed, and significant changes were detected.
Ipsilateral (injection) ROIs presented an estimated T1 of 1076 ± 320 ms, whereas contralateral ROIs (control)
presented values of 1914 ± 23 ms, with a significant average
decrease of 46%, in agreement with satisfactory results obtained for
RCE measurements in T1w MRI. Examples
of curve adjustments for T1 maps are shown
in Figure S3.
Endotoxin Analysis of the
G3 Radical Dendrimer
Before in vivo studies,
an endotoxin analysis of the G3 radical
dendrimer was carried out to confirm the absence of such toxin in
samples administered to mice. We performed the analysis at two different
concentrations: 0.4 and 4 mg/mL. In the sample with a lower concentration,
the value obtained (0.02 EU/mL) was below the detection range, and
in the sample with a higher concentration, very low endotoxin levels
were detected: 0.034 ± 0.003 EU/mL. These levels were considered
acceptable since the limit for administration in mice would be below
1 EU/mL (5 EU/kg for the usual routes of administration).
In
Vivo Studies
In an attempt to use
the minimum amount of the G3 radical dendrimer in the in vivo studies and produce as similar as possible a Gd-like enhancement,
we used two types of concentrations: first, a lower one of 0.00625
mmol/kg; and later, a higher one (0.025 mmol/kg). These concentrations
were chosen taking into account the usual Gd-based CA dose used in
clinical and preclinical approaches (0.1 mmol/kg) and the in vitro relaxivity of the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer: r1 relaxivity measured at 7 T (13 s–1·mM–1) was on the order of 4 times higher
than Gd-DTPA relaxivity (3.2 s–1·mM–1),[29] similar to the lithium salt derivative.[28]The lower dose (0.00625 mmol/kg) of the
G3 dendrimer is 16 times lower than the usual Gd-based CA dose (0.1
mmol/kg), but taking into account the 4 times higher relaxivity of
G3, we could expect only “4 times lower enhancement”
than with Gd-based CA. Thus, it could be a good starting point. In
fact, this dose proved suitable to determine properly the biodistribution
due to reasonable enhancement detection. However, it proved inappropriate
for tumor detection since it produced only a slight enhancement in
the tumor periphery.On the other hand, the higher dose chosen
later (0.025 mmol/kg)
is 4 times lower than the standard dose of Gd-based CA (0.1 mmol/kg),
but “in terms of enhancement”, we could expect similar
enhancement as Gd-based CA taking into account the aforementioned
relaxivity values. In fact, this dose proved suitable for tumor detection.
In Vivo Biodistribution and Tolerability
The preliminary biodistribution studies (MRI-based) were performed
with the G3 radical dendrimer at 0.00625 mmol/kg (lower dose) administered
through the tail vein, with n = 3 wt female C57BL/6
mice. With this experiment, we aimed to assess any T1 changes in different organs to check for the biodistribution
of G3 after intravenous administration.The G3 radical dendrimer
administration produced a slight enhancement in different organs of
wt mice on whole-body T1w MRI (Figure ), confirmed by a
decrease in T1 values calculated in T1 maps. The corresponding T1w enhancement was mostly observed in the kidney cortex
and pelvis. Kidney T1 decreased by 37.7%
at 20 min and by 23.8% at 60 min postadministration, which corresponded
to 41 and 16% overall increases in the T1w signal intensity, suggesting the relevance of renal excretion for
these compounds. This was further confirmed by data obtained from
the bladder: T1 decrease of ca. 36% and
signal intensity increase of 84%.
Figure 4
T1w MRI at
different times after G3
radical dendrimer administration (0.00625 mmol/kg). T1w representative images showing a slice through the kidneys
(upper row) and through the bladder (lower row). The main enhancement
was seen in the kidney cortex/pelvis and bladder.
T1w MRI at
different times after G3
radical dendrimer administration (0.00625 mmol/kg). T1w representative images showing a slice through the kidneys
(upper row) and through the bladder (lower row). The main enhancement
was seen in the kidney cortex/pelvis and bladder.The biodistribution data for the higher dose finally chosen for
MRI studies was expected to be fully comparable to the lower dose.
For confirmation purposes, one GL261 GB-bearing mouse was explored
with whole-body MRI 3 h after G3 radical dendrimer administration
at 0.025 mmol/kg once DCE-MRI studies were finished. Although the
timing did not completely match, the main contrast enhancement and T1 value decrease were also seen in the kidney
cortex and pelvis (41–59% in comparison with the basal measurements
in wt mice) and bladder (95% decrease), which is even higher than
the values found in the biodistribution study with the lower dose.
Since the main biodistribution parameters were confirmed, we considered
that the previous biodistribution experiment produced enough signal
to be analyzed and was not repeated in a whole cohort of animals with
the increased dose. Moreover, biodistribution obtained from EPR data
at lower and higher doses (see the next section) was in agreement
with the data obtained from whole-body MRI acquisitions.A tolerability
study was performed on three healthy C57BL/6 female
mice administered with the higher dose 0.025 mmol/kg G3 radical dendrimer
and closely followed up 10 days after injection since acute toxicity
would show up in the first few hours/days. In addition, they were
also inspected for health status and welfare for a month.Administered
mice did not show toxicity symptoms and did not experience
body-weight loss either during the first 10 days or in the whole month
of the follow-up. Figure shows the variation of weight along time. Their weight evolution
was as expected according to the Charles River growth chart for healthy
C57BL/6 females of this age. Their overall states such as fur aspect,
hydration, and behavior/activity were satisfactory. These results
demonstrate the nontoxicity of the G3 radical dendrimer in
vivo after systemic intravenous tail-vein injection at this
dose.
Figure 5
Percentage of body-weight variation of mice injected with the G3
radical dendrimer at dose 0.025 mmol/kg in the G3 dendrimer. The red
line indicates the 20% weight reduction point. Average starting values
and body-weight evolution are in agreement with values described from
the Jackson Laboratory (https://www.jax.org/jax-mice-and-services/strain-data-sheet-pages/body-weight-chart-000664).
Percentage of body-weight variation of mice injected with the G3
radical dendrimer at dose 0.025 mmol/kg in the G3 dendrimer. The red
line indicates the 20% weight reduction point. Average starting values
and body-weight evolution are in agreement with values described from
the Jackson Laboratory (https://www.jax.org/jax-mice-and-services/strain-data-sheet-pages/body-weight-chart-000664).
EPR-Based Biodistribution
and Radical Stability In Vivo
Mice administered
with the G3 radical dendrimer at lower
and higher doses were euthanized to check the amount of G3 in some
organs by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. A similar
mass of organ tissues was analyzed to obtain comparable results, and
no significant differences were found between the lower and higher
doses’ results.We analyzed the urine, kidneys and liver
of a C57BL/6 female wt mouse administered with 0.00625 mmol/kg (see Figure and the Supporting Information for additional data).
The highest amount of the G3 radical dendrimer (highest EPR signal
intensity) was found in urine (even taking into account that it was
diluted 1:2 with miliQ water to get the optimum volume to be properly
measured), followed by kidneys and liver. This result was in agreement
with the whole-body T1w MRI, also suggesting
excretion of the radical dendrimer through the kidneys. Interestingly,
the EPR spectrum shape of urine sample was almost identical to the
G3 spectrum before injection (see Figure S4). This means that the radical character of PROXYL radicals in the
G3 radical dendrimer was not quenched by circulating in the bloodstream,
passing from the blood to the kidneys and the bladder, 1.5 h postadministration.
This is a relevant result that demonstrates the high stability of
the radicals when anchored to the dendrimer, in contrast to the fast
reduction in vivo experienced by isolated nitroxides,
especially in the bloodstream and tissues, losing their contrast ability
shortly after injection.[13−16]
Figure 6
EPR spectra of urine, kidneys and liver
from a C57BL/6 female wt
mouse administered with 0.00625 mmol/Kg of G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical
dendrimer, euthanized 1.5 h after of intravenous administration. The
urine spectrum was obtained from the collected urine diluted to 1:2
with miliQ water.
We also analyzed the kidneys, liver, brain
tumor, healthy brain,
and muscle of a GL261-tumor-bearing mouse administered with the same
dose 0.00625 mmol/kg 1.5 h postinjection (see Figure S5), showing similar results. The largest amount of
the G3 radical dendrimer was found in the kidneys, followed by the
liver and the brain tumor, while an almost imperceptible EPR signal
was detected in the healthy brain and muscle. It is worth mentioning
that an important amount of the G3 radical dendrimer was detected
in the brain tumor, while the healthy surrounding brain barely showed
any G3 signal, suggesting that the G3 radical dendrimer can selectively
accumulate in tumors with few spreading to the surrounding brain.
This is a relevant and desirable characteristic in a contrast agent
intended to be used for brain tumors.EPR spectra of urine, kidneys and liver
from a C57BL/6 female wt
mouse administered with 0.00625 mmol/Kg of G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical
dendrimer, euthanized 1.5 h after of intravenous administration. The
urine spectrum was obtained from the collected urine diluted to 1:2
with miliQ water.In addition, a GL261
GB-bearing mouse with 0.025 mmol/kg dose was
euthanized 15 h after administration, and EPR was performed on bladder,
kidneys, liver, heart, brain tumor, healthy brain, and muscle. Similar
organ tissue mass was analyzed by EPR (around 52 mg each), and the
corresponding spectra are plotted in Figure . Similar to what was obtained with the lower
dose administered, the largest EPR signal intensity was found in the
kidneys, followed by the bladder, liver, brain tumor, and heart. It
is also important to remark that the selective accumulation behavior
in the brain tumor was reproduced at a higher dose (see the inset
in Figure ).
Figure 7
EPR spectra
of kidneys, bladder, liver, heart, muscle, brain tumor,
and contralateral healthy brain from GL261-tumor-bearing mice after
15 h of 0.025 mmol/kg administration of the radical dendrimer.
EPR spectra
of kidneys, bladder, liver, heart, muscle, brain tumor,
and contralateral healthy brain from GL261-tumor-bearing mice after
15 h of 0.025 mmol/kg administration of the radical dendrimer.The observation of an intense EPR signal after
15 h of intravenous
administration confirmed the stability of PROXYL radicals in vivo, farther beyond that of isolated nitroxides. Related
to this, the EPR signal observed in the heart means a long circulation
half-life of the radical dendrimer.
In Vivo MRI Studies with GL261 GB-Bearing Mice
As previously mentioned,
the lower dose of the G3 radical dendrimer
(0.00625 mmol/kg) administered to GL261 GB-bearing mice only produced
a slight enhancement in the tumor periphery and some hot spots within
the tumor (Figure S6), which may correspond
to more highly perfused regions. A whole set of mouse brain MRI studies,
including DCE-MRI, was performed, as described in the Experimental Section.However, importantly, the higher
dose (0.025 mmol/kg) produced a noticeable RCE in the tumor (Figures and S7). The aforementioned G3 radical dendrimer
dose was intravenously injected to n = 3 GL261 GB-bearing
mice, and experiments were conducted as for the lower dose previously
described.
Figure 8
Top: Axial T1w MRI for the follow-up
of tumor contrast enhancement before and after 5 min (ca. maximum
enhancement) and 60 min (final of first DCE-T1w-MRI follow-up, refer to Figure ) of G3 radical dendrimer administration
(0.025 mmol/kg) to GL261 GB-bearing mice.
Top: Axial T1w MRI for the follow-up
of tumor contrast enhancement before and after 5 min (ca. maximum
enhancement) and 60 min (final of first DCE-T1w-MRI follow-up, refer to Figure ) of G3 radical dendrimer administration
(0.025 mmol/kg) to GL261 GB-bearing mice.
Figure 9
Top: Color-code
scale for RCE (Gd 0.1 and 0.04 mmol/kg, 30 min;
and G3 radical dendrimer 0.025 mmol/kg, 60 min). Bottom: ROI kinetics
for these agents, showing the slower washout of G3. The maximum RCE
calculated was 158% for Gd 0.1 mmol/kg, 113% for Gd 0.04 mmol/kg,
and 126% for G3 0.025 mmol/kg. Contralateral enhancement was reproducible
in all cases (102 ± 3%). Please note that 0.04 mmol/kg administration
data comes from retrospective cases administered with Gd-DOTA instead
of Gd-DTPA. Analyses were performed with the DCE@urLAB software package.[32]
Changes observed in T1 values were
mostly seen in tumors rather than in the contralateral brain. T1 values were calculated before and after G3
administration with T1 map sequences ca.
1 h after G3 administration. T1 decrease
in the tumor was 19.2% (29.8% increase in the measured signal), while
no noticeable changes were found in the corresponding contralateral
part.The RCE and the kinetics of uptake and washout of the
G3 radical
dendrimer at 0.025 mmol/kg dose were compared with Gd-based CA administration
at the standard dose of 0.1 mmol/kg, as well as for 0.04 mmol/kg.
Only the first 60 min in the first DCE-MRI experiment of G3 were used
for comparison with Gd.Remarkably, the RCE measured for the
G3 radical dendrimer at 0.025
mmol/kg dose was similar to, although slightly lower than, the RCE
obtained with Gd-DTPA at the standard dose of 0.1 mmol/kg and proved
higher than the RCE obtained with Gd at 0.04 mmol/kg (Figure ). However, interestingly, the kinetics of washout was completely
different between both contrast agents. The maximum contrast enhancement
with Gd-DTPA varied with dose, ranging from 113 to 158%, and started
to decrease sharply after the first 5–6 min, suggesting a fast
washout. The RCE decreased to 125% after 30 min in the case of the
0.1 mmol/kg dose and recovering basal values in the case of the 0.04
mmol/kg dose. On the other hand, enhancement achieved with G3 radical
dendrimer administration proved mostly sustained along the time measured.
The enhancement of the tumor zone reached a maximum of 126% after
6 min and remained essentially unchanged during the whole time course
(RCE of 121% after 60 min). RCE data suggests that T1 contrast enhancement was sustained as long as 2.5 h
after CA administration (not shown). Therefore, the measured data
suggest that tissue enhancement triggered by the G3 radical dendrimer
administration may persist well beyond the washout time of Gd.Top: Color-code
scale for RCE (Gd 0.1 and 0.04 mmol/kg, 30 min;
and G3 radical dendrimer 0.025 mmol/kg, 60 min). Bottom: ROI kinetics
for these agents, showing the slower washout of G3. The maximum RCE
calculated was 158% for Gd 0.1 mmol/kg, 113% for Gd 0.04 mmol/kg,
and 126% for G3 0.025 mmol/kg. Contralateral enhancement was reproducible
in all cases (102 ± 3%). Please note that 0.04 mmol/kg administration
data comes from retrospective cases administered with Gd-DOTA instead
of Gd-DTPA. Analyses were performed with the DCE@urLAB software package.[32]This is also a relevant
point to highlight, suggesting that an
improvement in the imaging time frames could be achieved with G3 radical
dendrimer administration when compared to Gd chelates, which show
a very fast clearance.In summary, the selective accumulation
behavior of the G3 radical
dendrimer in the brain tumor, the high stability of the radicals in vivo, and the long circulation half-life of the radical
dendrimer make G3 radical dendrimers capable of imaging brain tumors
over clinically meaningful time scales following systemic administration,
at longer time periods than Gd chelates, without concerns over long-term
tissue accumulation of metals.
Conclusions
The
potential for in vivo contrast enhancement
capabilities of a radical dendrimer specially designed to act as a T1 contrast agent for MRI was described in GL261
orthotopic GB-bearing mice. In particular, the third generation of
a water-soluble radical dendrimer family based on poly(phosphorhydrazone)
dendrimers fully functionalized with PROXYL radicals on the periphery
(G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer), presenting high r1 relaxivity (13 mM–1·s–1). MR-based biodistribution studies showed contrast enhancement mostly
in the kidney cortex and pelvis, suggesting the relevance of renal
excretion for this compound, confirmed by EPR analyses of the selected
organs. Remarkably, it provides suitable contrast enhancement on murine
GL261 glioblastoma tumors comparable to commercial Gd-based contrast
agents (0.1 mmol/kg), at a 4 times lower concentration (0.025 mmol/kg
dose), mitigating concerns about toxic metal accumulation. In fact,
no signs of toxicity or weight loss were detected in mice after systemic
intravenous tail-vein injection of the radical dendrimer. In addition,
the selective accumulation of the G3 radical dendrimer in brain tumor
tissue is a relevant and desirable characteristic in a contrast agent
to be used for brain tumors. The G3 radical dendrimer also exhibited
longer retention within the tumor, which allows tumor imaging over
longer time frames (≥2.5 h) than Gd chelates which present
faster clearance profiles. Moreover, high stability of the radicals
anchored on the dendrimer surface when subjected to biological media
has been demonstrated both ex vivo and in
vivo. By EPR, it proved to be much higher (≥15 h)
than that of isolated nitroxides, which are rapidly reduced (half-lives
on the order of minutes).Therefore, the high contrast enhancement
(high relaxivity) and
high stability of the G3 radical dendrimer species demonstrate that
the two major limitations of nitroxyl radicals have been overcome,
even in in vivo conditions. At the same time, it
may also solve the major concern of Gd-based CAs, their established
toxicity. These important features, together with the selective accumulation
in brain tumor tissues and the longer imaging time frames in comparison
to Gd-based CA, make the G3-Tyr-PROXYL-ONa radical dendrimer a viable
alternative to metal-based MRI contrast agents, particularly on MRI
analysis of glioblastomas.
Authors: Fuminori Hyodo; Ken-Ichiro Matsumoto; Atsuko Matsumoto; James B Mitchell; Murali C Krishna Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-10-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: R C Brasch; D E Nitecki; M Brant-Zawadzki; D R Enzmann; G E Wesbey; T N Tozer; L D Tuck; C E Cann; J R Fike; P Sheldon Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1983-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Andrzej Rajca; Ying Wang; Michael Boska; Joseph T Paletta; Arnon Olankitwanit; Michael A Swanson; Deborah G Mitchell; Sandra S Eaton; Gareth R Eaton; Suchada Rajca Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-09-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Elena Badetti; Vega Lloveras; Klaus Wurst; Rosa María Sebastián; Anne-Marie Caminade; Jean-Pierre Majoral; Jaume Veciana; José Vidal-Gancedo Journal: Org Lett Date: 2013-07-05 Impact factor: 6.005
Authors: Yaqi Shen; Frank L Goerner; Christopher Snyder; John N Morelli; Dapeng Hao; Daoyu Hu; Xiaoming Li; Val M Runge Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Julian M W Chan; Rudy J Wojtecki; Haritz Sardon; Ashlynn L Z Lee; Cartney E Smith; Artem Shkumatov; Shujun Gao; Hyunjoon Kong; Yi Yan Yang; James L Hedrick Journal: ACS Macro Lett Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 6.903