| Literature DB >> 35748166 |
Jian Li1, Ning Li2, Yuanyuan Zheng1, Dongyang Lou1, Yue Jiang2, Jiaxi Jiang3, Qunhui Xu2, Jing Yang1, Yujing Sun1, Chuxuan Pan1, Jianlan Wang1, Zhengchun Peng2, Zhikun Zheng4, Wei Liu1.
Abstract
Flexible pressure sensors play significant roles in wearable devices, electronic skins, and human-machine interface (HMI). However, it remains challenging to develop flexible piezoresistive sensors with outstanding comprehensive performances, especially with excellent long-term durability. Herein, a facile "interfacial locking strategy" has been developed to fabricate metal aerogel-based pressure sensors with excellent sensitivity and prominent stability. The strategy broke the bottleneck of the intrinsically poor mechanical properties of metal aerogels by grafting them on highly elastic melamine sponge with the help of a thin polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) layer as the interface-reinforcing media. The hierarchically porous conductive structure of the ensemble offered the as-prepared flexible piezoresistive sensor with a sensitivity as high as 12 kPa-1 , a response time as fast as 85 ms, and a prominent durability over 23 000 compression cycles. The excellent comprehensive performance enables the successful application of the flexible piezoresistive sensor as two-dimensional (2D) array device as well as three-dimensional (3D) force-detecting device for real-time monitoring of HMI activities.Entities:
Keywords: interface; metal aerogels; piezoresistive sensors; polymer; porous materials; pressure sensors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35748166 PMCID: PMC9376829 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202201912
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 17.521
Figure 1Preparation process and characterizations of the Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop flexible sensor. a) Schematic illustration for the preparation of Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop sensing layer and flexible pressure sensor. SEM images of b–b3) Ag2Au3 AG/MS, c–c3) Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop, SEM images of d–d2) the tentatively destroyed sites of Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop.
Figure 2Mechanical properties of the Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop flexible pressure sensor. Photographs of the a) Ag2Au3 AG before and after being pressed. The photographs of b) Ag2Au3 AG/MS and c) Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop before compression and after 10 cycles of compression at 80% strain. Compressive stress–strain curves of d) MS, Ag2Au3 AG/MS, Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop. e) Compressive stress–strain curves of Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop with 50–70% strain. f) Compressive stress–strain curves and high retention of Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop with different cycles.
Figure 3Sensing performance of the Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop flexible pressure sensor. a) Typical sensitivity curve of the Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop flexible pressure sensor. b) Response and relaxation time of the pressure sensor under rapid loading–unloading. c) −∆R/R 0 response at different compression displacements. d) −∆R/R 0 response at different compression frequencies. e) The response of the sensor was compressed over 23 000 cycles at a strain of 10% and a frequency of ≈0.9 Hz.
Figure 4Influencing factors. a) Sensitivity of the Ag2Au3 AG/MS, Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop, Ag NW/MS, and Ag NW/MS/PDMSop flexible pressure sensors. b) Cycling stability of Ag2Au3 AG/MS, Ag2Au3 AG/MS/PDMSop, Ag NW/MS, and Ag NW/MS/PDMSop through 2000 compression cycles at 10% strain and ≈1 Hz. c) Effect of PDMS content on maximum sensitivity. d) The (R−R)/R 0‐Pressure curves of the AgXAuY AG/MS with different silver and gold ratio.
Figure 5Application of the flexible pressure sensors in a) finger bending, b) pulse monitoring, c) 4 × 4 array device and d) the identification map of e) the location, and f) 3D force device. The scheme of e) 3D force device and f) the curves of the resistance of the four sensing units as a function of the force angle.