CONSPECTUS: Metallic and catalytically active materials with high surface area and large porosity are a long-desired goal in both industry and academia. In this Account, we summarize the strategies for making a variety of self-supported noble metal aerogels consisting of extended metal backbone nanonetworks. We discuss their outstanding physical and chemical properties, including their three-dimensional network structure, the simple control over their composition, their large specific surface area, and their hierarchical porosity. Additionally, we show some initial results on their excellent performance as electrocatalysts combining both high catalytic activity and high durability for fuel cell reactions such as ethanol oxidation and the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Finally, we give some hints on the future challenges in the research area of metal aerogels. We believe that metal aerogels are a new, promising class of electrocatalysts for polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) and will also open great opportunities for other electrochemical energy systems, catalysis, and sensors. The commercialization of PEFCs encounters three critical obstacles, viz., high cost, insufficient activity, and inadequate long-term durability. Besides others, the sluggish kinetics of the ORR and alcohol oxidation and insufficient catalyst stability are important reasons for these obstacles. Various approaches have been taken to overcome these obstacles, e.g., by controlling the catalyst particle size in an optimized range, forming multimetallic catalysts, controlling the surface compositions, shaping the catalysts into nanocrystals, and designing supportless catalysts with extended surfaces such as nanostructured thin films, nanotubes, and porous nanostructures. These efforts have produced plenty of excellent electrocatalysts, but the development of multisynergetic functional catalysts exhibiting low cost, high activity, and high durability still faces great challenges. In this Account, we demonstrate that the sol-gel process represents a powerful "bottom-up" strategy for creating nanostructured materials that tackles the problems mentioned above. Aerogels are unique solid materials with ultralow densities, large open pores, and ultimately high inner surface areas. They magnify the specific properties of nanomaterials to the macroscale via self-assembly, which endow them with superior properties. Despite numerous investigations of metal oxide aerogels, the investigation of metal aerogels is in the early stage. Recently, aerogels including Fe, Co, Ni, Sn, and Cu have been obtained by nanosmelting of hybrid polymer-metal oxide aerogels. We report here exclusively on mono-, bi- and multimetallic noble metal aerogels consisting of Ag, Au, Pt, and Pd and their application as electrocatalysts.
CONSPECTUS: Metallic and catalytically active materials with high surface area and large porosity are a long-desired goal in both industry and academia. In this Account, we summarize the strategies for making a variety of self-supported noble metal aerogels consisting of extended metal backbone nanonetworks. We discuss their outstanding physical and chemical properties, including their three-dimensional network structure, the simple control over their composition, their large specific surface area, and their hierarchical porosity. Additionally, we show some initial results on their excellent performance as electrocatalysts combining both high catalytic activity and high durability for fuel cell reactions such as ethanol oxidation and the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Finally, we give some hints on the future challenges in the research area of metal aerogels. We believe that metal aerogels are a new, promising class of electrocatalysts for polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) and will also open great opportunities for other electrochemical energy systems, catalysis, and sensors. The commercialization of PEFCs encounters three critical obstacles, viz., high cost, insufficient activity, and inadequate long-term durability. Besides others, the sluggish kinetics of the ORR and alcohol oxidation and insufficient catalyst stability are important reasons for these obstacles. Various approaches have been taken to overcome these obstacles, e.g., by controlling the catalyst particle size in an optimized range, forming multimetallic catalysts, controlling the surface compositions, shaping the catalysts into nanocrystals, and designing supportless catalysts with extended surfaces such as nanostructured thin films, nanotubes, and porous nanostructures. These efforts have produced plenty of excellent electrocatalysts, but the development of multisynergetic functional catalysts exhibiting low cost, high activity, and high durability still faces great challenges. In this Account, we demonstrate that the sol-gel process represents a powerful "bottom-up" strategy for creating nanostructured materials that tackles the problems mentioned above. Aerogels are unique solid materials with ultralow densities, large open pores, and ultimately high inner surface areas. They magnify the specific properties of nanomaterials to the macroscale via self-assembly, which endow them with superior properties. Despite numerous investigations of metal oxide aerogels, the investigation of metal aerogels is in the early stage. Recently, aerogels including Fe, Co, Ni, Sn, and Cu have been obtained by nanosmelting of hybrid polymer-metal oxide aerogels. We report here exclusively on mono-, bi- and multimetallic noble metal aerogels consisting of Ag, Au, Pt, and Pd and their application as electrocatalysts.
Aerogels are unique
solid materials with extremely low densities,
high porosity, and large inner surface area.[1] They combine the chemical and physical properties of nanomaterials
with those of the macroscale and may integrate the specific properties
of the various constituents in one resulting material, making aerogels
very attractive in various applications such as catalysis, thermoresistors,
piezoelectrics, and sensors. The first aerogels (silica and alike)
were pioneered by Kistler in 1931.[2] Since
then, the research on aerogels has largely widened to include inorganic
(e.g., metal oxide, carbide, silica–metal oxide, and metal-doped),
inorganic–organic hybrid (e.g., polymer-cross-linked inorganic
aerogels), organic (e.g., all major polymeric classes, including resorcinol/formaldehyde,
melamine/formaldehyde, polyurethane, polyamide, polyurea, polynorbornene,
polydicyclopentadiene, conducting polymers (polythiophene) and polybenzoxazine),
and carbon aerogels.[1,3−5] Recently, a
major breakthrough in the development of inorganic aerogels such as
metal sulfides, selenides, and tellurides (i.e., chalcogenide semiconductors)
was made by Brock, Kanatzidis, and their co-workers.[6−8] More recently, an important step forward toward metallic aerogels
was achieved by Leventis and co-workers, who obtained metallic aerogels
including Fe, Co, Ni, Sn, and Cu by nanosmelting of hybrid carbonizable
polymer–metal oxide aerogels.[4,9−13] However, the extension of this method to metals that cannot be carbothermally
reduced from their oxides remains a challenge.[14] Even though metal-doped oxide/carbon-based aerogels such
as SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2,
and carbon aerogels doped with Pt, Pd, Au, and Cu have been realized
by impregnation or by the sol–gel method for a long time,[3,15,16] the fabrication of pure metallic
aerogels with metal backbones by the direct sol–gel method
has very recently been achieved for the first time, as will be outlined
below.[17−23]Polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) have attracted worldwide
attention because of their high energy efficiency and outstanding
environmental compatibility. However, the commercialization of PEFCs
still faces three critical obstacles: high cost, insufficient activity,
and inadequate long-term durability. Various approaches have been
taken to overcome these issues by tailoring the size, composition,
shape, and structure of the catalyst.[24−33] The design of supportless catalysts with extended surfaces, such
as nanostructured films, nanowires, nanotubes, and porous nanostructures,
has provided tremendous opportunities to improve the catalytic performance
and durability. The advantages are their high surface area, large
porosity, elimination of support corrosion, and high robustness.[26,30,31] In this context, a very promising
class of unsupported catalyst materials are metal aerogels consisting
of extended metal backbone nanonetworks. They combine the unique properties
of metals (such as good electrical and thermal conductivity, catalytic
activity, and ductility/malleability) with the unique properties of
common aerogels (high surface area, ultralow density, and high porosity).In this Account, we describe the recent progress in the design
of noble metal aerogels together with their applications as electrocatalysts
for fuel cells. After an introduction of the synthetic strategies,
the main characteristics of these aerogels are discussed along with
various characterizations. Before a final overview of metal aerogels,
including current challenges and future prospects in this area, the
first applications of noble metal aerogels as electrocatalysts with
promising results for ethanol oxidation and the oxygen reduction reaction
(ORR) are presented.
Preparation of Noble Metal Aerogels with
High Surface Area and
Porosity
An overview of the representative preparative strategies
for noble
metal aerogels via the sol–gel process is shown in Scheme 1. The formation of the hydrogel is the critical
step for the preparation. To date, this has been realized via two
strategies: via gelation of preformed noble metal nanoparticles (NPs)
(Scheme 1, strategy (I)) or via an in situ
spontaneous gelation process (Scheme 1, strategy
(II)).
Scheme 1
Schematic Illustration of Noble Metal Aerogel Preparation via
Gelation
of Preformed Nanoparticles (Strategy (I)) and via an in Situ Spontaneous
Gelation Process (Strategy (II))
In the first strategy to be outlined here (Scheme 1, strategy (I)), citrate-capped monometallic NPs
are first
synthesized via reduction of the noble metal precursor (HAuCl4, AgNO3, H2PtCl6, or PdCl2) with NaBH4 using trisodium citrate as a stabilizer.[17,21] The diameters of the obtained Au, Pt, and Pd NPs are 3–5,
3–6, and 3–6 nm, respectively, and the Ag NPs exhibit
a bimodal size distribution with diameters in the range of 3–6
and 8–15 nm. Other recently published routes lead to hollow
preformed bimetallic “nanoshell” particles via the galvanic
displacement reaction between citrate-stabilized Ag NPs and noble
metal precursors such as HAuCl4, K2PdCl4, and K2PtCl4 or to thiolate-coated
Ag nanoshell particles via fast chemical reduction of preformed Ag2O NPs.[22,23] Citrate is frequently selected
as a stabilizer since it can endow both electrostatic and steric repulsions
to the metal NPs.[34] Moreover, the coordination
interaction between the citrate anions and the metal NP surface is
relatively weak.[34] Gelation of the preformed
noble metal NP solutions or their mixtures is induced by deliberate
destabilization via the following typical steps. First of all, the
solution is concentrated by a factor of 10–50 with polystyrene
centrifuge filters or a rotary evaporator. During the filter concentration,
water washing is carried out to minimize the concentration of residual
stabilizer and impurities. Then the gelation can be induced by settling
of the concentrated NP solutions at room or increased temperature
(323–348 K) or via addition of destabilizers such as ethanol,
H2O2, etc. By means of strategy (I), a wide
range of monometallic hydrogels, including Au, Ag, Pt, and Pd, and
multimetallic hydrogels, including Au–Ag, Au–Pd, Pt–Ag,
Pd–Ag, Pt–Pd, Au–Ag–Pt, Au–Pt–Pd,
Ag–Pt–Pd, and Au–Ag–Pt–Pd, have
been prepared.[17,21]In the second strategy
(Scheme 1, strategy
(II)), the hydrogels are spontaneously formed from the in situ reduction
of noble metal precursors with NaBH4 in a single step,
i.e., without the preformation of adequately stabilized NPs.[18−20] To date, α,β,γ-cyclodextrin (CD)-protected Pd
(Pdα,β,γ-CD) hydrogels,[18] pure Pd and Pt hydrogels, and bimetallic PtPd100– hydrogels with controllable Pt to Pd ratios[19,20] have been obtained by this approach. As demonstrated by the transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) images in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information, this hydrogel formation continuously
proceeds via spontaneous assembly involving four main continuous stages
from the transient formation of NPs, via short nanowires, nanowire
networks, and finally to the hydrogels. The salts generated during
the synthesis are suspected to play an important role in the gel formation.
They increase the ionic strength of the solution and decrease the
electrostatic repulsion between the primary NPs; they may also transform
the isotropic electrostatic repulsions between the NPs into anisotropic
forms, thus leading to the rapid anisotropic agglomeration/assembly
of the non-further-stabilized NPs.[18]Direct evaporation of the liquid from a wet gel can lead to considerable
shrinkage and even collapse of the network structure of the hydrogel
due to the high surface tension or capillary pressure generated during
the drying processes. Supercritical drying is an appropriate way to
retain the internal structure of the hydrogel also in the dry state.
It prevents a direct phase transition of the solvent from the liquid
to the gas phase, minimizes the forces leading to the collapse of
the fragile pores inside the structure, and allows the gel to be dried
with very little shrinkage. Consequently, the resulting aerogels have
a higher surface area, an intact pore shape, and a larger pore volume
than those porous structures obtained using conventional drying methods.
Thus, CO2 supercritical drying is utilized throughout to
transform the noble metal hydrogels to aerogels. Before supercritical
drying, the water in the pores of the hydrogels is replaced by acetone
and further with liquid CO2.
Characterizations
Morphology
TEM and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
were utilized for the morphological characterization of the noble
metal aerogels prepared by both synthetic routes shown in Scheme 1. Some representative images are shown in Figures 1 and 2. All of the aerogels
(no matter whether mono- or multimetallic or prepared via either of
the strategies outlined above) show three-dimensional-network-like
structures with extended nanochains interconnected with each other
together with a large number of open pores and tunnels.[17−21] Depending on the nature of the noble metal NPs, the nanochains may
appear in the form of fused-nanowire-like structures or necklacelike
chains, as shown in Figure 2 and in Figures
S2–S4 and the detailed information in the Supporting Information.[17−21]
Figure 1
SEM
images of some representative noble metal aerogels. The aerogels
in (a–d) were prepared via strategy (I); the aerogels in (e)
and (f) were obtained by strategy (II). The images in (c) and (d)
are reproduced from ref (21). Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society. The image in
(e) is reproduced with permission from ref (18). Copyright 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &
Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 2
TEM images of a variety
of noble metal aerogels.
The aerogels in
(a–d) were prepared via strategy (I); those in (e) and (f)
were obtained via strategy (II). The images in (c) and (d) are reproduced
from ref (21). Copyright
2014 American Chemical Society. The images in (e) and (f) are reproduced
with permission from refs (18) and (19). Copyright 2012 and 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
SEM
images of some representative noble metal aerogels. The aerogels
in (a–d) were prepared via strategy (I); the aerogels in (e)
and (f) were obtained by strategy (II). The images in (c) and (d)
are reproduced from ref (21). Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society. The image in
(e) is reproduced with permission from ref (18). Copyright 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &
Co. KGaA, Weinheim.TEM images of a variety
of noble metal aerogels.
The aerogels in
(a–d) were prepared via strategy (I); those in (e) and (f)
were obtained via strategy (II). The images in (c) and (d) are reproduced
from ref (21). Copyright
2014 American Chemical Society. The images in (e) and (f) are reproduced
with permission from refs (18) and (19). Copyright 2012 and 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Crystalline Structure and
Alloying
The crystalline
structure and spatial elemental distribution of the aerogels have
been investigated by high-resolution TEM (HRTEM), powder X-ray diffraction
(XRD), and high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron
microscopy (HAADF-STEM) combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry
(EDX). All of the noble metal aerogels show a face-centered-cubic
(fcc) polycrystalline structure, as reflected by the HRTEM images
and corresponding fast Fourier transform results in Figure 3 as well as the XRD patterns in Figure 4. The HRTEM images in Figure 3 also show the wide exposure of lattice planes such as the (111)
plane and the existence of lattice boundaries and stacking faults
along the interconnected network nanowires in the aerogels.
Figure 3
HRTEM images
of some noble metal aerogels. Au–Ag and Ag–Pt
aerogels were prepared via strategy (I). Pdβ-CD and Pt–Pd aerogels were obtained via strategy (II). The images
in (a) and (b) are adapted with permission from refs (18) and (19) and those in (c) and (d)
from ref (17). Copyright
2012, 2013, and 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 4
XRD patterns of Au–Pd and Ag–Pd
aerogels synthesized
via strategy (I). Adapted from ref (21). Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.
HRTEM images
of some noble metal aerogels. Au–Ag and Ag–Pt
aerogels were prepared via strategy (I). Pdβ-CD and Pt–Pd aerogels were obtained via strategy (II). The images
in (a) and (b) are adapted with permission from refs (18) and (19) and those in (c) and (d)
from ref (17). Copyright
2012, 2013, and 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.XRD patterns of Au–Pd and Ag–Pd
aerogels synthesized
via strategy (I). Adapted from ref (21). Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.For multimetallic structures,
the state of alloying is an important
feature regarding physical properties, chemical reactivity, and catalytic
activity. For the bimetallic aerogels fabricated via strategy (I),
the initial building blocks of the gel structure are separated NPs
of different metals. This raises the question of whether interdiffusion
of the two types of metal atoms and thus alloying occur under the
given conditions or the metals exist in separated phases within the
structure. When the bimetallic aerogel is composed of metals of sufficiently
different lattice parameters, it is relatively easy to confirm their
alloying state by HRTEM and XRD. For example, the Pt–Ag aerogel
evolved from preformed Pt and Ag NPs shows the morphology of the as-synthesized
nanocrystals without further alloying or growth of secondary particles
(Figure 3c). The two sorts of particles can
be distinguished by HRTEM because of the relatively large difference
in their (111) lattice spacings (2.36 Å for silver and 2.26 Å
for platinum). In other examples, the powder XRD patterns of Ag–Pd
and Au–Pd aerogels (Figure 4) ((111)
lattice spacings of 2.35 Å for gold and 2.23 Å for palladium)
clearly show separated silver/gold and palladium phases, as indicated
by the two sets of patterns for silver/gold and palladium in the aerogels
and especially evidenced by the well-separated reflections at 2θ
> 70°. For bimetallic aerogels composed of metals of very
similar
lattice parameters, such as Au–Ag and Pt–Pd, it is very
difficult to distinguish the distribution of the two metals in the
aerogels by HRTEM and XRD. The common fcc crystal structure, the very
similar crystallographic parameters, and the small crystallite sizes
complicate the analysis. In this case, the HAADF-STEM technique combined
with EDX is very useful to reveal the spatial distribution of metals
in the bimetallic aerogels. For instance, the HAADF-STEM–EDX
results for the Au–Ag aerogel in Figure 5 show no distinct Z contrast (Z = 47 for Ag and Z = 79 for Au) in the HAADF image,
and an overall distribution of both metals along the nanochains. Hence,
it is concluded from these results that interdiffusion of the gold
and silver atoms between the initially monometallic NPs and therefore
the formation of an alloy occurred during the network formation.
Figure 5
Phase
analysis of Au–Ag aerogel using HAADF-STEM and STEM-EDX
mapping of silver and gold. No pronounced Z contrast
inside the nanochains is visible; the elemental mapping shows an overall
distribution of both metals. Reproduced from ref (21). Copyright 2014 American
Chemical Society.
Phase
analysis of Au–Ag aerogel using HAADF-STEM and STEM-EDX
mapping of silver and gold. No pronounced Z contrast
inside the nanochains is visible; the elemental mapping shows an overall
distribution of both metals. Reproduced from ref (21). Copyright 2014 American
Chemical Society.
Surface Area and Porosity
The porosity and surface
area of the aerogels have been evaluated by nitrogen physisorption
measurements. The isotherms for N2 adsorption and desorption
of the noble metal aerogels obtained to date cannot be assigned to
any standard isotherms but mainly show a combination of IUPAC type-II
and type-IV isotherms (Figure 6). The isotherms
display multilayer adsorption behavior, and no plateau appears for
high relative pressures; these characteristics indicate that the materials
are mostly macroporous. The surface areas of the aerogels were determined
via analysis of the isotherms by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) method. The BET surface areas of the noble metal aerogels are
in the range of 32–168 m2 gaerogel–1. From the comparison of the BET surface areas of
porous noble metals prepared via different routes obtained from the
literature (Table S1 in the Supporting Information), it is obvious that noble metal aerogels show exceptionally high
surface areas. The bimetallic Pt–Pd aerogels synthesized via
strategy (II) have lower surface areas than the pure Pd or Pt aerogel,
which is probably due to the obvious gel volume shrinkage of the bimetallic
aerogels during the acetone exchange step before supercritical drying,
the lower atomic weight of Pd compared with Pt, and the smaller average
diameter of the nanochain in the Pt aerogel (∼2.7 nm) compared
with other aerogels (∼4.2 nm).
Figure 6
Nitrogen physisorption isotherms, pore
size distributions, and
cumulative pore volumes (Vcumulative)
of (a, b) Pt–Pd aerogels prepared via strategies (I) and (II),
respectively, and (c) the Pdβ-CD aerogel prepared
via strategy (II).
Nitrogen physisorption isotherms, pore
size distributions, and
cumulative pore volumes (Vcumulative)
of (a, b) Pt–Pd aerogels prepared via strategies (I) and (II),
respectively, and (c) the Pdβ-CD aerogel prepared
via strategy (II).The pore size distributions
and cumulative pore volumes were calculated
from the desorption branch of the isotherms using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda
(BJH) theory or density functional theory, depending on the carbon
content. The results together with the SEM and TEM characterizations
show wide pore size distributions in the aerogels ranging from micropores
to mesopores and macropores, with most of the pore volume stemming
from macropores. This hierarchical pore system is of great advantage
for minimizing diffusion barriers in sensor and/or catalytic applications
since the diffusion rates through 10–50 nm pores are similar
to those of molecules in open media.[35]Some photographs of the noble metal aerogel monoliths are shown
in Figure S5 in the Supporting Information. The monolith densities of the noble metal aerogels were estimated
by weighing several monoliths and assessing their spatial dimensions.
The monolith densities of the as-prepared aerogels are in the range
of 0.01–0.10 g cm–3, which corresponds to
approximately 1/1000 to 1/120 of the bulk density of the respective metal(s).
Processability
and Electrical Conductivity
The desired
handling and/or technological integration of the fragile, porous,
and irregular-shaped aerogel monoliths into device architectures is
crucial for applications but remains challenging. We tried to improve
the processability of the metallic gels by grafting them to several
kinds of substrates.[21] By immersion of
the substrates into a hydrogel solution and evaporation of the solvent,
metallic xerogel films with thicknesses of several micrometers on
these substrates can be obtained (Figure S6a in the Supporting Information). Even after noncritical drying, the
structure shows high porosity and an open pore system. Another method
to increase the processability is the formation of gel–polymer
hybrid materials.[5,21,36,37] To realize this, the pores are first infiltrated
with a monomer solution, and this is followed by a polymerization
reaction inside the gel network structure. For instance, a Au–Ag–Pt–poly(ethyl
cyanoacrylate) hybrid gel has been obtained via this method (Figure S6b).[21]The electrical conductivity, which is related to the electrical accessibility
of the functional sites, is another important property of an electrocatalyst.
The electrical conductivities of the noble metal xerogel films were
measured with a van der Pauw setup (see the inset in Figure S6a).[21,38] When the layer resistance and
film thickness were taken into account, specific resistances of ca.
2 Ω·mm2/m and 5 Ω·mm2/m
were obtained for Au–Pd and Pt–Pd xerogel films on glass
substrates, respectively. These values are only 2 orders of magnitude
higher than those for the corresponding bulk metals, underlining the
high electrical conductivity of the multimetallic nanostructures obtained
by our approaches.
Applications in Electrocatalysis
As a new, unique class of materials that present high specific
surface areas and large open pores, noble metal aerogels are very
promising in various applications such as in heterogeneous gas-phase
catalysis, electrocatalysis, and sensors. For these applications,
a number of characteristics are especially favorable: (1) the hierarchical
porous structures give these materials a very high specific surface
area, allow efficient mass transport through the pores, and have less
diffusional resistance and easier access to active sites (such as
defects, facets, and left stabilizer species[18,28,29]),[39] all of which
enhance the catalytic activity; (2) the aerogel networks are mostly
composed of interconnected nanochains that are several nanometers
in size, which is in the optimal range for electrocatalysis of processes
such as the ORR (high mass activity);[24,25] and (3) the
interconnected nanochains in the networks are mostly fused-nanowire-like
structures with extended surfaces, which are expected to have higher
durability during (electro)catalysis.[26,30,31] Furthermore, the self-supporting character of the
aerogels may prevent the loss of durability observed in conventional
noble metal catalysts supported on carbon due to corrosion. Last but
not least, the molar ratio of the constituent elements in the multimetallic
aerogels can be controlled precisely, which allows the design of the
optimum balance among composition, reactivity, durability, and cost
and fully exploits the synergistic effects in enhancing the catalytic
activity.[40,41]The electrocatalytic performance of
the Pdα,β,γ-CD aerogels toward
ethanol oxidation was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry
and chronoamperometry and compared with that of commercial Pd/C (10
wt %) (Figure 7b,c).[18] All of the PdCD aerogels and the Pd/C electrodes show
two well-defined current peaks characteristic of the electrooxidation
of ethanol (Figure 7b). The mass-specific current
densities (in A mgmetal–1) in the forward
scan for the PdCD aerogels, especially the Pdα-CD and Pdβ-CD aerogels, are much higher than
that for the commercial Pd/C. The onset potentials of the Pdα-CD, Pdβ-CD, and Pdγ-CD aerogels show negative shifts of 47–69 mV relative to that
of the Pd/C electrode, implying enhanced kinetics of the ethanol electrooxidation
for the PdCD aerogels. The long-term stabilities of the
PdCD aerogels and the Pd/C electrodes were investigated
by chronoamperometry (Figure 7c). The PdCD aerogels, especially the Pdα-CD and
Pdβ-CD aerogels, exhibit much higher initial
polarization mass-specific current densities (2.8 and 2.0 times that
of Pd/C, respectively), slower current decays, and higher steady-state
current densities for ethanol electrooxidation compared with the Pd/C
electrode, indicating the higher electrocatalytic activity and durability
of the PdCD aerogels. The enhanced electrocatalytic activity
of the Pdα-CD and Pdβ-CD aerogels relative to that of the Pdγ-CD aerogel
may be related to the role of these two CDs as ethanol reservoirs
as a result of the size-selective host–guest interaction between
the CDs and ethanol. This indicates that the left stabilizer species
on the noble metal aerogels might also play an important role in improving
their catalytic activity.
Figure 7
(a) Schematic illustration of the electrocatalytic
activities of
Pdα,β,γ-CD aerogels toward ethanol
oxidation and PtPd100– aerogels toward the ORR. (b) Cyclic voltammograms
of electrodes modified with Pdα,β,γ-CD aerogels and Pd/C in 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M C2H5OH aqueous solution. (c) Chronoamperometric curves for ethanol electrooxidation
at −0.3 V/Ag/AgCl. (d) Volcano plot of the ORR mass activity
of various PtPd100– aerogel catalysts as a function of Pt content at
0.9 V vs RHE. The open circle represents the value for Pt/C. (e) Relative
ORR mass activities of various PtPd100– catalysts as functions of the
number of potential cycles (linear potential sweeps between 0.5 and
1.0 V/RHE): ○, Pt40Pd60; ■, Pt80Pd20; ▲, Pt; ⧫, Pd; ☆, 20%
Pt/C. Panels (a–e) are reproduced with permission from refs (18) and (19). Copyright 2012 and 2013
Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
(a) Schematic illustration of the electrocatalytic
activities of
Pdα,β,γ-CD aerogels toward ethanol
oxidation and PtPd100– aerogels toward the ORR. (b) Cyclic voltammograms
of electrodes modified with Pdα,β,γ-CD aerogels and Pd/C in 1.0 M KOH + 1.0 M C2H5OH aqueous solution. (c) Chronoamperometric curves for ethanol electrooxidation
at −0.3 V/Ag/AgCl. (d) Volcano plot of the ORR mass activity
of various PtPd100– aerogel catalysts as a function of Pt content at
0.9 V vs RHE. The open circle represents the value for Pt/C. (e) Relative
ORR mass activities of various PtPd100– catalysts as functions of the
number of potential cycles (linear potential sweeps between 0.5 and
1.0 V/RHE): ○, Pt40Pd60; ■, Pt80Pd20; ▲, Pt; ⧫, Pd; ☆, 20%
Pt/C. Panels (a–e) are reproduced with permission from refs (18) and (19). Copyright 2012 and 2013
Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.For the ORR investigations, monometallic and bimetallic PtPd100– aerogels generated via the in situ spontaneous gelation process
were evaluated and compared with Pt/C (20 wt %).[19] The specific activity (based on the total metal loading)
at 0.9 V as a function of Pt content in the aerogel shows a volcano-type
behavior,[40−44] with the Pt80Pd20 aerogel exhibiting the highest
mass-specific activity (Figure 7d). The downshift
of the d-band center in the alloys, commonly used as a descriptor
of the surface electronic state of ORR catalysts,[40−44] shows the same volcano-type behavior for the PtPd100– aerogels. Therefore, the remarkable activity of the Pt80Pd20 aerogel indicates the best balance between the free
energies of adsorption of oxygen-containing reaction species.The comparison of the ORR activities of the PtPd100– aerogels with that
of Pt/C clearly indicates that PtPd100– bimetallic aerogels are highly
active cathode catalysts for PEFCs. The PtPd100– bimetallic aerogels containing
more than 40% Pt meet or even exceed the performance targets for ORR
fuel cell catalysts (0.44 A mgPt–1 at
0.9 V vs RHE) as defined by the U.S. Department of Energy.[26] In particular the Pt80Pd20 aerogel shows the best performance and its mass activity is 5 times
higher than that of the commercial Pt/C catalyst.Durability
test results (Figure 7e) indicate
that the bimetallic aerogels show much better durability than the
pure Pt and Pd aerogels as well as Pt/C. The commercial Pt/C catalyst
and the pure Pt aerogel show similar durability with losses of 54%
and 56%, respectively, after 10 000 cycles. For the Pt80Pd20 and Pt40Pd60 aerogels,
the mass activity increases at the beginning and then decreases slowly,
with the Pt80Pd20 aerogel having a 12% loss
and the Pt40Pd60 aerogel exhibiting even a 36%
increase compared with their initial mass activities. The significant
enhancement of the mass activity upon potential cycling for the high-Pd-content
PtPd100– alloy aerogels is supposedly due to the dealloying of Pd and
increased surface roughness during the potential cycling.The
higher electrocatalytic activity and durability of the PtPd100– bimetallic
aerogels discussed above indicate the important role
of synergistic effects in their electrocatalytic applications.The extraordinary electrocatalytic activities and durability of
the PdCD aerogels toward the anodic electrooxidation of
ethanol and the PtPd100– aerogels toward the cathodic reduction of oxygen
indicate that unsupported noble metal aerogels can be considered as
a new class of very promising PEFC electrocatalysts that combine the
high stability of extended surfaces with the high surface area of
NPs.
Summary and Outlook
In this Account, we have presented the
design and synthetic routes
of various novel noble metal aerogels and their promising applications
as electrocatalysts in fuel cell cathode and anode reactions. Despite
the long history of aerogels, the development of self-supported metallic
aerogels and their applications are still in the early stage. A number
of challenges remain before the widespread implementation of these
materials in various practical areas can be realized. First, the diversity
of the morphologies of the metallic aerogel is limited and needs to
be enriched. This may be achieved by gelation of preformed metallic
nanocrystals of different shapes or structures or by developing new
strategies for gel formation. Second, the variety of the metal aerogel
components is still limited, and the extension to other metal components
and to desired combinations thereof is necessary. Third, although
various noble metal aerogels have been successfully synthesized, great
challenges still remain on how to develop general and simple strategies
that can be utilized to create series of metal aerogels in scalable
ways and by this reducing the aerogel cost and promoting their wide
applications in practical areas. Fourth, even though a mechanism of
gel formation has tentatively been proposed on the basis of the initial
experiments, a detailed and in-depth understanding of the underlying
processes is still missing. This unraveling is thought to be essential
in order to surmount the challenges mentioned above and to achieve
further breakthroughs in the development of metallic aerogels. Fifth,
systematic studies of how to control the surface area and porosity
of the noble metal aerogels is of great importance. Sixth, besides
the effects of surface area and porosity, the surface properties of
the metal (e.g., defects, exposed surface planes, and left stabilizer
species) might also play important roles in their catalytic behavior,
which is of great interest to study. Finally, the application of metallic
aerogels is still barely explored, currently only involving the application
as electrocatalysts for various electrochemical reactions or as explosives
and thermites.[13] Even though these works
have paved the aerogel application road, the exploration of them in
fuel cell reactions in depth and width is necessary, and the applications
of metallic aerogels in other areas of catalysis, other electrochemical
energy systems, hydrogen storage, surface-enhanced Raman spectrocopy,
sensors, etc., are of great interest and need to be explored in the
near future.
Authors: Francisco J Perez-Alonso; David N McCarthy; Anders Nierhoff; Patricia Hernandez-Fernandez; Christian Strebel; Ifan E L Stephens; Jane H Nielsen; Ib Chorkendorff Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-03-29 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Vojislav R Stamenkovic; Bongjin Simon Mun; Matthias Arenz; Karl J J Mayrhofer; Christopher A Lucas; Guofeng Wang; Philip N Ross; Nenad M Markovic Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2007-02-18 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Camila A Saez Cabezas; Gary K Ong; Ryan B Jadrich; Beth A Lindquist; Ankit Agrawal; Thomas M Truskett; Delia J Milliron Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Dan Wen; Wei Liu; Danny Haubold; Chengzhou Zhu; Martin Oschatz; Matthias Holzschuh; André Wolf; Frank Simon; Stefan Kaskel; Alexander Eychmüller Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2016-01-25 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Konstantin G Nikolaev; Yury E Ermolenko; Andreas Offenhäusser; Sergey S Ermakov; Yulia G Mourzina Journal: Front Chem Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 5.221
Authors: Fred J Burpo; Enoch A Nagelli; Lauren A Morris; Kamil Woronowicz; Alexander N Mitropoulos Journal: Molecules Date: 2018-07-12 Impact factor: 4.411