| Literature DB >> 35745648 |
Paola Vallejo-Armenta1, Guillermina Ferro-Flores1, Clara Santos-Cuevas1, Francisco Osvaldo García-Pérez2, Pamela Casanova-Triviño2, Bayron Sandoval-Bonilla3, Blanca Ocampo-García1, Erika Azorín-Vega1, Myrna Luna-Gutiérrez1.
Abstract
Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is highly expressed on the cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) of the tumor stroma. Recently, we reported the preclinical evaluation and clinical biokinetics of a novel 99mTc-labeled FAP inhibitor radioligand ([99mTc]Tc-iFAP). This research aimed to evaluate [99mTc]Tc-iFAP for the tumor stroma imaging of six different cancerous entities and analyze them from the perspective of stromal heterogeneity. [99mTc]Tc-iFAP was prepared from freeze-dried kits with a radiochemical purity of 98 ± 1%. The study included thirty-two patients diagnosed with glioma (n = 5); adrenal cortex neuroendocrine tumor (n = 1); and breast (n = 21), lung (n = 2), colorectal (n = 1) and cervical (n = 3) cancer. Patients with glioma had been evaluated with a previous cranial MRI scan and the rest of the patients had been involved in a [18F]FDG PET/CT study. All oncological diagnoses were corroborated histopathologically. The patients underwent SPECT/CT brain imaging (glioma) or thoracoabdominal imaging 1 h after [99mTc]Tc-iFAP administration (i.v., 735 ± 63 MBq). The total lesions (n = 111) were divided into three categories: primary tumors (PT), lymph node metastases (LNm), and distant metastases (Dm). [99mTc]Tc-iFAP brain imaging was positive in four high-grade WHO III-IV gliomas and negative in one treatment-naive low-grade glioma. Both [99mTc]Tc-iFAP and [18F]FDG detected 26 (100%) PT, although the number of positive LNm and Dm was significantly higher with [18F]FDG [82 (96%)], in comparison to [99mTc]Tc-iFAP imaging (35 (41%)). Peritoneal carcinomatosis lesions in a patient with recurrent colorectal cancer were only visualized with [99mTc]Tc-iFAP. In patients with breast cancer, a significant positive correlation was demonstrated among [99mTc]Tc-iFAP uptake values (Bq/cm3) of PT and the molecular subtype, being higher for subtypes HER2+ and Luminal B HER2-enriched. Four different CAF subpopulations have previously been described for LNm of breast cancer (from CAF-S1 to CAF-S4). The only subpopulation that expresses FAP is CAF-S1, which is preferentially detected in aggressive subtypes (HER2 and triple-negative), confirming that FAP+ is a marker for poor disease prognosis. The results of this pilot clinical research show that [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT imaging is a promising tool in the prognostic assessment of some solid tumors, particularly breast cancer.Entities:
Keywords: 99mTc-FAP inhibitor; 99mTc-labeled iFAP; FAP; SPECT; tumor microenvironment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745648 PMCID: PMC9230816 DOI: 10.3390/ph15060729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
General characteristics of the patients included in the [99mTc]Tc-iFAP imaging study.
| Characteristics | Number |
|---|---|
| No. patient | 32 |
| 50.8 ± 16.7 | |
| Female | 28 (88%) |
| Male | 4 (12%) |
|
| |
|
| 21 (66%) |
| Ductal carcinoma, Luminal A | 2 |
| Ductal carcinoma, Luminal B | 3 |
| Ductal carcinoma, Luminal B HER2+ | 5 |
| Ductal carcinoma, HER2+ | 2 |
| Ductal carcinoma, Triple negative | 9 |
|
| 2 (6%) |
| NSCLC adenocarcinoma | |
|
| 3 (9%) |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | |
|
| 5 (16%) |
| Astrocytoma NOS (WHO II) | 1 |
| Anaplastic astrocytoma NOS (WHO III) | 3 |
| Glioblastoma NOS (WHO IV) | 1 |
|
| 1 (3%) |
| Adenocarcinoma | 1 |
|
| 1 (3%) |
| Poorly differentiated, Ki67 30% | 1 |
| Initial staging | 27 (84%) |
| Restaging | 5 (15%) |
Detailed description of the disease reported in cancer patients included in this research for tumor evaluation with the [99mTc]Tc-iFAP radioligand.
| No. | Age | Gender | Clinical Setting | Type of Cancer | Extent of Cancer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 69 | Male | Initial staging | Lung cancer, NSCLC (adenocarcinoma). | Primary, lymph node, bone |
| 2 | 51 | Female | Initial staging | Lung cancer, NSCLC (adenocarcinoma). | Primary, lymph node |
| 3 | 66 | Female | Restaging | Cervical cancer (squamous cell carcinoma). | Lymph node |
| 4 | 60 | Female | Initial staging | Cervical cancer (squamous cell carcinoma). | Primary |
| 5 | 91 | Female | Initial staging | Cervical cancer (squamous cell carcinoma). | Primary |
| 6 | 70 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 8, G3, moderate DR, Ki67 70%). Triple-negative. | Primary, lymph node |
| 7 | 44 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 9, G3, mild DR, Ki67 70%). Triple-negative. | Primary, lymph node |
| 8 | 54 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 6, G2, mild DR). Luminal A | Primary, lymph node |
| 9 | 49 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 7, G2, mild DR, Ki67 40%). HER2+ | Primary, lymph node |
| 10 | 40 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 8, G3, moderate DR, Ki67 70%). Triple-negative. | Primary, lymph node |
| 11 | 28 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 8, G3, Ki67 60%). Triple-negative. | Primary, lymph node |
| 12 | 29 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 8, G3, moderate DR, Ki67 60%). Luminal B | Primary, lymph node |
| 13 | 60 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 9, G3, moderate DR, Ki67 30%). Luminal B HER2+ | Primary, lymph node |
| 14 | 55 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 6, G2, mild DR, Ki67 15%). Luminal B | Primary, lymph node |
| 15 | 55 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 5, G1, moderate DR). Luminal A. | Lymph node |
| 16 | 36 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 8, G3, mild DR, Ki67 80%). Triple-negative. | Primary, lymph node |
| 17 | 41 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 6, G2, moderate DR, Ki67 40%). Luminal B HER2+ | Primary, lymph node |
| 18 | 48 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 8, G3, mild DR, Ki67 30%). Luminal B HER2+ | Primary, lymph node, lung |
| 19 | 46 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 7, G2). Luminal B HER2+ | Primary, lymph node, liver |
| 20 | 58 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 6, G2, Ki67 30%). Luminal B. | Primary, lymph node |
| 21 | 63 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 7, G2, mild DR, Ki67 50%). Her2+ | Primary, lymph node |
| 22 | 44 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 9, G3, mild DR, Ki67 70%). Triple-negative. | Primary, lymph node |
| 23 | 42 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 8, G3, mild DR, Ki67 80%). Triple-negative. | Primary, lymph node |
| 24 | 68 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 9, G3, Ki67 50%). Triple-negative. | Primary, lymph node, lung |
| 25 | 55 | Female | Initial staging | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 9, G3, moderate DR, Ki67 60%). Triple-negative. | Primary |
| 26 | 37 | Female | Restaging | Glioblastoma NOS (WHO IV) | Primary |
| 27 | 76 | Male | Initial staging | Anaplastic astrocytoma NOS (WHO III) | Primary |
| 28 | 40 | Female | Initial staging | Astrocytoma NOS (WHO II) | Primary |
| 29 | 32 | Female | Restaging | Anaplastic astrocytoma NOS (WHO III) | Primary |
| 30 | 27 | Male | Restaging | Anaplastic astrocytoma NOS (WHO III) | Primary |
| 31 | 47 | Male | Restaging | Colorectal cancer (adenocarcinoma). | Peritoneal carcinomatosis |
| 32 | 23 | Female | Initial staging | Adrenal cortical neuroendocrine tumor (poorly differentiated, Ki67 30%) | Primary, lung |
DR: desmoplastic reaction; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; SBR: Scarff–Bloom–Richardson grading; Ki67: cell proliferation index.
Tumor-to-contralateral tissue background ratio (T/Bc) of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP in patients with high-grade WHO III–IV gliomas.
| Diagnosis | Status Brain SPECT | T/Bc |
|---|---|---|
| Astrocytoma NOS (WHO II) | Negative | NA |
| Anaplastic astrocytoma NOS (WHO III) ( | Positive | 6.3 and 7.8 |
| Anaplastic astrocytoma NOS restaging (WHO III) | Positive | 15.4 |
| Glioblastoma NOS (WHO IV) | Positive | 13.9 |
Figure 1(a) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT coregistered to MR images (SPECT/MRI) and (b) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT. Note the adequate visualization of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP uptake in high-grade gliomas (WHO III-IV)-treatment-naive and recurrent (R). However, low-grade glioma (WHO II) did not show uptake.
Number of lesions detected with [99mTc]Tc-iFAP and [18F]FDG in all patients except gliomas.
| Primary Tumor | Lymph Node Metastases | Distant Metastases | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [99mTc]Tc-iFAP | 26 (100%) | 31 (51%) | 4 (17%) | 61 (55%) |
| [18F]FDG | 26 (100%) | 61 (100%) | 21 (88%) | 108 (97%) |
|
|
|
| ||
| [99mTc]Tc-iFAP | ||||
| Lung cancer NSCLC | 3 | 0 | ||
| Triple-negative BC | 10 | 0 | ||
| Luminal A | 0 | 0 | ||
| Luminal B HER2+ BC | 7 | 2 | ||
| Luminal B BC | 4 | 0 | ||
| HER2+ BC | 5 | 0 | ||
| Cervical cancer | 2 | 0 | ||
| Colorectal cancer | 0 | 3 | ||
| Adrenal cortical NT | 0 | 1 | ||
| [18F]FDG | ||||
| Lung cancer NSCLC | 3 | 1 | ||
| Triple-negative BC | 25 | 1 | ||
| Luminal A BC | 5 | 0 | ||
| Luminal B HER2+ BC | 8 | 16 | ||
| Luminal B BC | 10 | 1 | ||
| HER2+ BC | 7 | 0 | ||
| Cervical cancer | 2 | 0 | ||
| Colorectal cancer | 0 | 0 | ||
| Adrenal cortical NT | 1 | 2 | ||
BC: breast cancer; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; NT: neuroendocrine tumor.
Figure 2(a) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT/CT and (b) [18F]FDG PET/CT images of the primary tumors of three different types of cancers. All primary lesions show concordant uptake between both molecular imaging methods. [99mTc]Tc-iFAP uptake was considerably lower regarding [18F]FDG in patients with cervical cancer and neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of the adrenal cortex.
Figure 3Primary breast cancer tumors. (a) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP MIP, (b) [18F]FDG MIP, (c) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT/CT, and (d) [18F]FDG PET/CT. All primary lesions show concordant uptake between both molecular imaging methods. [99mTc]Tc-iFAP uptake is decreased in pure hormonal molecular subtypes (Luminal A and B) and elevated in subtypes with HER2+ expression (Luminal B HER2+ and pure HER2+). The triple negative subtype shows moderate and heterogeneous uptake. MIP: maximum intensity projection.
Figure 4Lymph node metastases in breast cancer. (a) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT/T and (b) [18F]FDG PET/CT. All malignant-appearing axillary lymphadenopathies are hypermetabolic; however, most of them (arrowheads) exhibit reduced or absent [99mTc]Tc-iFAP uptake in all molecular subtypes of breast cancer (lesion sizes >8 mm).
Figure 5Distant metastases in various types of cancers. (a,c) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT/CT and (b,d) [18F]FDG PET/CT. All distant metastatic lesions are hypermetabolic; however, most of them (arrowhead) exhibit decreased or no uptake of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP. In the case of the patient with recurrent colon cancer, areas of diffuse [99mTc]Tc-iFAP uptake were observed in liver subcapsular implants and in the anterior abdominal wall, which were not detected with [18F]FDG. BC: breast cancer. R: recurrence.
Figure 6Box plot of the target-to-background ratios of (a) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP and (b) [18F]F-FDG in all primary tumors, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases (except gliomas).The T/Bp ratio is higher in all categories of both radiotracers, particularly in the primary tumor. T/Bm (tumor/mediastinum), T/Bl (tumor/liver), and T/Bp (tumor/psoas muscle). mode.
Figure 7Box plot of the T/Bp ratio of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP in primary tumors and LN metastases of breast cancer. In primary tumors, the T/Bp (tumor/psoas muscle) ratio is higher in HER2+ and Luminal B HER2+ molecular subtypes. In LN metastases, a decrease in T/Bp is observed and there is no significant difference among the molecular subtypes (Pearson correlation coefficient: r = 0.4027). mode and ° = outliers.
Figure 8CAF subpopulations as prognostic markers in breast cancer (in diagnosis). Four CAF subpopulations have been reported in the lymph node metastases of breast cancer (CAF-S1 to CAF-S4). The most relevant and predominant are CAF-S1 FAP+ and CAF-S4 FAP-. Pelon et al. [23] established a model of clinical application to the knowledge generated from the different subpopulations, in such a way that a prognostic impact is proposed according to the predominance of CAFs as follows: if at the time of diagnosis the patient exhibits low content of CAF-S1 FAP+ in LNm, they present a low risk of late Dm ((a) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT/CT(-), no uptake in left axillary adenopathy of Luminal A breast cancer); on the other hand, if high levels of CAF-S1 FAP+ are demonstrated in LNm, the risk of distant metastasis increases ((b) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT/CT(+), uptake in left axillary adenopathy of Luminal B HER2+ breast cancer). Finally, in distant metastatic lesions, only CAF-S4 FAP- is expressed [(c) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT/CT(-) in lung Dm and extremely low uptake in some right axillary lymph nodes that exhibit hypermetabolism with [18F]FDG; likewise, (d) multiple lung and liver metastases did not exhibit uptake of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP]. BC: breast cancer, LNm: lymph node metastasis, Dm: distant metastasis.
Figure 9The proposed [Tc(V)]EDDA/HYNIC core structure in the [99mTc]Tc-iFAP radioligand. The advantage that HYNIC-iFAP presents with respect to previously reported quinolinoyl-cyanopyrrolidine-based FAP inhibitors is the possibility of obtaining [99mTc]Tc(V)-EDDA/HYNIC stable cores from instant freeze-dried kit formulations.