| Literature DB >> 35631416 |
Luis Coria-Domínguez1,2, Paola Vallejo-Armenta1, Myrna Luna-Gutiérrez1, Blanca Ocampo-García1, Brenda Gibbens-Bandala1, Francisco García-Pérez3, Gerardo Ramírez-Nava1, Clara Santos-Cuevas1, Guillermina Ferro-Flores1.
Abstract
Tumor microenvironment fibroblasts overexpress the fibroblast activation protein (FAP). We recently reported the preclinical evaluation of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP as a new SPECT radioligand capable of detecting FAP. This research aimed to evaluate the kinetic and dosimetric profile of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP in healthy volunteers, and to assess the radioligand uptake by different solid tumors in three cancer patients. [99mTc]Tc-iFAP was obtained from lyophilized formulations prepared under GMP conditions with >98% radiochemical purity. Whole-body scans of six healthy subjects were obtained at 0.5, 2, 4, and 24 h after [99mTc]Tc-iFAP (740 MBq) administration. A 2D-planar/3D-SPECT hybrid activity quantitation method was used to fit the biokinetic models of the source organs (volume of interest: VOI) as exponential functions (A(t)VOI). The total nuclear transformations (N) that occurred in the source organs were calculated from the mathematical integration (0,∞) of A(t)VOI. The OLINDA code was used to estimate the radiation doses. Three treatment-naive patients (breast, lung, and cervical cancer) with a prior [18F]FDG PET/CT scan underwent whole-body, chest, and abdominal SPECT/CT scanning after [99mTc]Tc-iFAP (740 MBq) administration. Both imaging methods were compared visually and quantitatively. Oncological diagnoses were performed histopathologically. The results showed favorable [99mTc]Tc-iFAP biodistribution and kinetics due to rapid blood activity removal (t1/2α = 2.22 min and t1/2β = 90 min) and mainly renal clearance. The mean radiation equivalent doses were 5.2 ± 0.8 mSv for the kidney and 1.7 ± 0.3 mSv for the liver after administration of 740 MBq. The effective dose was 2.3 ± 0.4 mSv/740 MBq. [99mTc]Tc-iFAP demonstrated high and reliable uptake in the primary tumor lesions and lymph node metastases in patients with breast, cervical, and lung cancer, which correlated with that detected by [18F]FDG PET/CT. The tumor microenvironment molecular imaging from cancer patients obtained in this research validates the performance of additional clinical studies to determine the utility of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP in the diagnosis and prognosis of different types of solid tumors.Entities:
Keywords: FAP imaging; [99mTc]Tc-FAP inhibitor ligand; fibroblast activation protein; technetium-99m
Year: 2022 PMID: 35631416 PMCID: PMC9143259 DOI: 10.3390/ph15050590
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1Anterior and posterior planar whole-body images of healthy subjects (top: female, bottom: male) at 0.5 h, 2 h, 4 h, and 24 h after [99mTc]Tc-iFAP intravenous administration (740 MBq).
Figure 2Blood clearance of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP from healthy subjects with t1/2α = 2.22 min (70.4%) and t1/2β = 90 min (29.6%). Inset: proposed chemical structure for the [99mTc]Tc-iFAP radioligand.
Mean biokinetic model of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP and total nuclear transformations (N) (MBq.h/MBq) (mean ± SD) in source organs calculated from six healthy volunteers using a hybrid 2D-planar/3D-SPECT methodology.
| Organ | Biokinetic Model |
|
|---|---|---|
| Liver | 1.11 × 10−1 ± 1.74 × 10−2 | |
| Kidneys | 1.22 × 10−1 ± 7.69 × 10−2 | |
| Urinary bladder | 5.02 × 10−1 ± 1.23 × 10−1 | |
| Remainder of the body | 3.04 ± 0.37 |
VOI = volume of interest.
Equivalent and effective doses of [99mTc]Tc-iFAP obtained from six healthy subjects (1 female and 5 males).
| Target Organ | Equivalent Doses |
|---|---|
| Adrenals | (2.23 ± 0.35) × 10−3 |
| Brain | (1.36 ± 0.21) × 10−3 |
| Breast | (1.14 ± 0.18) × 10−3 |
| Gallbladder Wall | (2.30 ± 0.36) × 10−3 |
| LLI Wall | (2.99 ± 0.45) × 10−3 |
| Small Intestine | (2.48 ± 0.37) × 10−3 |
| Stomach Wall | (1.93 ± 0.30) × 10−3 |
| ULI Wall | (2.31 ± 0.36) × 10−3 |
| Heart Wall | (1.87 ± 0.29) × 10−3 |
| Kidneys | (7.01 ± 1.09) × 10−3 |
| Liver | (2.23 ± 0.35) × 10−3 |
| Lungs | (1.63 ± 0.26) × 10−3 |
| Muscle | (1.74 ± 0.27) × 10−3 |
| Ovaries | (3.02 ± 0.47) × 10−3 |
| Pancreas | (2.27 ± 0.35) × 10−3 |
| Red Marrow | (1.73 ± 0.29) × 10−3 |
| Skin | (1.11 ± 0.17) × 10−3 |
| Spleen | (2.02 ± 0.32) × 10−3 |
| Testes | (2.10 ± 0.33) × 10−3 |
| Thymus | (1.62 ± 0.25) × 10−3 |
| Thyroid | (1.64 ± 0.25) × 10−3 |
| Urinary Bladder Wall | (2.15 ± 0.34) × 10−3 |
| Uterus | (4.27 ± 0.67) × 10−3 |
| Effective Dose (mSv/MBq) | (3.12 ± 0.49) × 10−3 |
Patient characteristics before [99mTc]Tc-iFAP and [18F]FDG imaging. Oncological diagnoses were confirmed via histopathological studies.
| No. | Age | Gender | Clinical Status | Type of Cancer | Extent of Cancer |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 | Female | Initial assessment | Breast cancer (ductal carcinoma; SBR 8, G3, moderate DR, Ki67 70%). Triple-negative. | Primary, lymph node |
| 2 | 51 | Male | Initial assessment | Lung cancer, NSCLC (adenocarcinoma). | Primary, lymph node |
| 3 | 66 | Female | Recurrence | Cervical cancer (squamous cell carcinoma). | Lymph node |
DR: desmoplastic reaction; NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer; SBR: Scarff–Bloom–Richardson grading; Ki67: cell proliferation index.
Figure 3Patient with triple-negative right breast cancer (Patient 1). (a) Maximum-intensity projection [18F]FDG PET image at 1 h p.i. (b) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP whole-body planar scintigraphy in anterior projection. Inset: thoracic SPECT at 3 h p.i. (c) [18F]FDG PET/CT axial sections. (d) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT/CT axial sections. Right mammary gland with increased size and thickening of the generalized cutaneous plane, with a solid lesion as well as poorly defined borders in the interline topography of the upper quadrants that extends to the retroareolar region, conditioning its retraction (primary tumor). Ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathies (Berg levels I and II). The uptake of both radiopharmaceuticals was concordant in all tumor lesions.
Figure 4Patient with left lung adenocarcinoma (Patient 2). (a) Maximum-intensity projection [18F]FDG PET image at 1 h p.i. (b) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP whole-body planar scintigraphy in anterior projection. Inset: thoracic SPECT at 3 h p.i. (c) [18F]FDG PET/CT axial sections. (d) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT/CT axial sections. Solid lesion in the apicoposterior segment of the left upper lobe with irregular edges, which contacts the mediastinal pleura. Mediastinal adenopathy at subaortic level 5. The uptake of both radiopharmaceuticals was concordant in all tumor lesions.
Figure 5Patient with cervical squamous cell carcinoma and retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence (Patient 3). (a) Maximum-intensity projection [18F]FDG PET image at 1 h p.i. (b) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP whole-body planar scintigraphy in anterior projection. Inset: abdominal SPECT at 3 h p.i. (c) [18F]FDG PET/CT axial sections. (d) [99mTc]Tc-iFAP SPECT/CT axial sections. Lymph node conglomerates at the right retrocrural and retroperitoneal intercaval-aortic level with retrocaval extension. No recurrent primary lesion was observed at the pelvic level. The uptake of both radiopharmaceuticals was concordant in all tumor lesions.
Tumor/background (T/B) ratios evaluated with the [99mTc]Tc-iFAP and [18F]FDG radiotracers in cancer patients.
| Primary Tumors | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type of Cancer | Tracer | T/Bm | T/Bl | T/Bp | T/Bc |
| Breast (1) | [99mTc]Tc-iFAP | 3.7 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 3.1 |
| [18F]FDG | 4.2 | 2.9 | 7.4 | 8.3 | |
| Lung (2) | [99mTc]Tc-iFAP | 8.8 | 5.3 | 10.2 | 7.6 |
| [18F]FDG | 4.4 | 2.9 | 8.1 | 10.9 | |
| Cervical (3) | [99mTc]Tc-iFAP | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| [18F]FDG | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | |
| Average (1–3) | [99mTc]Tc-iFAP | 6.3 ± 3.6 | 4.3 ± 1.4 | 7.2 ± 4.3 | 5.4 ± 3.2 |
| [18F]FDG | 4.3 ± 0.1 | 2.9 ± 0.0 | 7.8 ± 0.5 | 9.6 ± 1.8 | |
|
| |||||
| Breast (1) | [99mTc]Tc-iFAP | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.9 |
| [18F]FDG | 2.8 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 5.7 | |
| Lung (2) | [99mTc]Tc-iFAP | 2.2 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| [18F]FDG | 3.6 | 2.4 | 6.7 | 9.1 | |
| Cervical (3) | [99mTc]Tc-iFAP | 8.3 | 2.7 | 7.8 | 8.4 |
| [18F]FDG | 4.2 | 2.1 | 7.2 | 6.3 | |
| Average (1–3) | [99mTc]Tc-iFAP | 4.2 ± 3.5 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | 4.3 ± 3.0 | 4.1 ± 3.8 |
| [18F]FDG | 3.5 ± 0.7 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 6.3 ± 1.2 | 7.0 ± 1.8 | |
T/Bm: tumor/mediastinum; T/Bl: tumor/liver; T/Bp: tumor/psoas muscle; T/Bc: tumor/contralateral healthy tissue; n.a.: not applicable because no recurrent primary lesion was observed at the pelvic level.