Literature DB >> 33934311

68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT, a new step in breast cancer imaging: a comparative pilot study with the 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Halil Kömek1, Canan Can2, Yunus Güzel2, Zeynep Oruç3, Cihan Gündoğan2, Özgen Ahmet Yildirim4, İhsan Kaplan2, Erkan Erdur4, Mehmet Serdar Yıldırım5, Bahri Çakabay6.   

Abstract

AIM: We aimed to compare the roles of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary tumor and metastases in primary and recurrent breast cancer. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: Twenty female patients with histopathologically confirmed primary and recurrent breast cancer were included in the prospective study. All patients underwent FDG and FAPI PET/CT imaging in the same week. The number of primary and metastatic lesions, SUVmax values, and tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) were recorded from both scans. Data obtained were statistically compared.
RESULTS: FAPI PET/CT was superior to FDG in detecting breast lesions, as well as hepatic, bone, lymph node, and cerebral metastases in terms of patient- and lesion-based assessments. The sensitivity and specificity of FAPI in detecting primary breast lesions were 100% and 95.6%, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of FDG were 78.2% and 100%, respectively. The SUVmax values of primary breast tumors, lymph nodes, lung metastases, and bone metastases were significantly higher on FAPI imaging than FDG imaging (p < 0.05). However, SUVmax values of hepatic metastases did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between two imaging techniques (p > 0.05). Also, FAPI imaging yielded significantly higher TBR in breast lesions as well as hepatic, bone, brain and lung metastases compared to FDG (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT is superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting the primary tumor in patients with breast cancer with its high sensitivity, high SUVmax, and high TBR. 68 Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT is also superior to 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting lymph node, hepatic, bone, and cerebral metastases because it has lower background activity and higher uptake in subcentimetric lesions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG; 68 Ga-FAPI; Breast Cancer; PET/CT

Year:  2021        PMID: 33934311     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01616-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  1 in total

1.  68Ga-FAPi-46 diffuse bilateral breast uptake in a patient with cervical cancer after hormonal stimulation.

Authors:  Ida Sonni; Stephanie Lee-Felker; Sanaz Memarzadeh; Molly M Quinn; Christine E Mona; Katharina Lückerath; Johannes Czernin; Jeremie Calais
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 9.236

  1 in total
  11 in total

1.  Superiority of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT scan in detecting additional lesions compared to 18FDG PET/CT scan in breast cancer.

Authors:  Umut Elboga; Ertan Sahin; Tulay Kus; Yusuf Burak Cayirli; Gokmen Aktas; Evren Uzun; Havva Yesil Cinkir; Fatih Teker; Ozlem Nuray Sever; Alper Aytekin; Latif Yilmaz; Aydin Aytekin; Ufuk Cimen; Vuslat Mumcu; Benan Kilbas; Y Zeki Çelen
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 2.  FAPI-PET/CT in Cancer Imaging: A Potential Novel Molecule of the Century.

Authors:  Rong Huang; Yu Pu; Shun Huang; Conghui Yang; Fake Yang; Yongzhu Pu; Jindan Li; Long Chen; Yunchao Huang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  Clinical Evaluation of Nuclear Imaging Agents in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ziqi Li; Mariam S Aboian; Xiaohua Zhu; Bernadette Marquez-Nostra
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Head-to-Head Comparison of Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) Radiotracers versus [18F]F-FDG in Oncology: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giorgio Treglia; Barbara Muoio; Hessamoddin Roustaei; Zahra Kiamanesh; Kamran Aryana; Ramin Sadeghi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Could Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP)-Specific Radioligands Be Considered as Pan-Tumor Agents?

Authors:  Hessamoddin Roustaei; Zahra Kiamanesh; Emran Askari; Ramin Sadeghi; Kamran Aryana; Giorgio Treglia
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 6.  Fibroblast activation protein-based theranostics in cancer research: A state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Jianhao Chen; Yizhen Pang; Kaili Fu; Qihang Shang; Hua Wu; Long Sun; Qin Lin; Haojun Chen
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 11.556

7.  FAPI-04 Uptake in Healthy Tissues of Cancer Patients in 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT Imaging.

Authors:  Cihan Gündoğan; Yunus Güzel; Canan Can; İhsan Kaplan; Halil Kömek
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Non-conventional and Investigational PET Radiotracers for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michele Balma; Virginia Liberini; Manuela Racca; Riccardo Laudicella; Matteo Bauckneht; Ambra Buschiazzo; Daniele Giovanni Nicolotti; Simona Peano; Andrea Bianchi; Giovanni Albano; Natale Quartuccio; Ronan Abgral; Silvia Daniela Morbelli; Calogero D'Alessandria; Enzo Terreno; Martin William Huellner; Alberto Papaleo; Désirée Deandreis
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-12

9.  Head-to-head Intra-individual Comparison of [68Ga]-FAPI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  E Novruzov; K Dendl; H Ndlovu; P L Choyke; M Dabir; M Beu; F Novruzov; E Mehdi; F Guliyev; S A Koerber; I Lawal; G Niegisch; J Debus; U Haberkorn; M Sathekge; F L Giesel
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.484

Review 10.  Imaging Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) with FAPi PET.

Authors:  Laura Gilardi; Lighea Simona Airò Farulla; Emre Demirci; Ilaria Clerici; Emanuela Omodeo Salè; Francesco Ceci
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.