| Literature DB >> 35745370 |
Angela Serra1,2,3, Giusy Del Giudice1,2,3, Pia Anneli Sofia Kinaret4, Laura Aliisa Saarimäki1,2,3, Sarah Søs Poulsen5, Vittorio Fortino6, Sabina Halappanavar7, Ulla Vogel5, Dario Greco1,2,3,4.
Abstract
The molecular effects of exposures to engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) are still largely unknown. In classical inhalation toxicology, cell composition of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a toxicity indicator at the lung tissue level that can aid in interpreting pulmonary histological changes. Toxicogenomic approaches help characterize the mechanism of action (MOA) of ENMs by investigating the differentially expressed genes (DEG). However, dissecting which molecular mechanisms and events are directly induced by the exposure is not straightforward. It is now generally accepted that direct effects follow a monotonic dose-dependent pattern. Here, we applied an integrated modeling approach to study the MOA of four ENMs by retrieving the DEGs that also show a dynamic dose-dependent profile (dddtMOA). We further combined the information of the dddtMOA with the dose dependency of four immune cell populations derived from BAL counts. The dddtMOA analysis highlighted the specific adaptation pattern to each ENM. Furthermore, it revealed the distinct effect of the ENM physicochemical properties on the induced immune response. Finally, we report three genes dose-dependent in all the exposures and correlated with immune deregulation in the lung. The characterization of dddtMOA for ENM exposures, both for apical endpoints and molecular responses, can further promote toxicogenomic approaches in a regulatory context.Entities:
Keywords: TinderMIX; biomarker; bronchoalveolar lavage; carbon black; dose-dependent; engineered nanomaterials; mechanism of action; multiwalled carbon nanotubes; titanium dioxide; toxicogenomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745370 PMCID: PMC9228743 DOI: 10.3390/nano12122031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Datasets used in this study.
| ENM ID | Type | Length/Diameter (nm) | Surface Area (m2/g) | No. Samples | Doses (µg) | Time (Day) | GSE | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NM401 | Multiwalled carbon nanotube | 4048/67 | 18 | 139 | 18/54/162 | 1/3/28 | GSE55286 | [ |
| NRCWE-026 | Multiwalled carbon nanotube | 847/10 | 245 | 139 | 18/54/162 | 1/3/28 | GSE55286 | [ |
| CB (Printex 90) | Carbon black | 14 (diameter) | 295–338 | 67 | 18/54/162 | 1/3/28 | GSE35193 | [ |
| TiO2 (L181 UVTitan) | Nano-TiO2 | 20.6 (diameter) | 107.7 | 65 | 18/54/162 | 1/3/28 | GSE41041 | [ |
Figure 1(A) Number of dose-dependent genes for each ENM for each of the dose-time labels. The labels can be interpreted as follows: sensitive—genes that respond at low doses; intermediate—genes that respond at intermediate doses; resilient—genes that respond at high doses.; early—genes that respond at short time points; middle—genes that respond at intermediate time points; late—genes that respond at late time points. The blue color gradient describes the number of dose-dependent genes: dark blue represents a smaller number of genes identified, whereas light blue represents a higher number of dose-dependent genes. (B) Number of DEG (red) and genes with a dPOD activity label (green) for each ENM.
Figure 2Functions of the dddtMOA shared across ENM categories (A,B,C,H) and specific to each ENM (D,E,F,G).
Figure 3(A) Number of dynamic dose-dependent genes correlated with cell counts for each ENM. (B) Proportion of dynamic dose-dependent genes correlated with cell counts for each ENM.
Figure 4KEGG pathways of the dynamic dose-dependent genes for the different ENMs. The different panels represent the pathways enriched by the dose-dependent genes that for each ENM correlate with macrophages (A), neutrophils (B), eosinophils (C), and lymphocytes (D). The size of the dots represent the gene ration whereas the color represent the adjusted p-values of the enrichment analysis. The numbers in brackets below the ENM names represent the number of genes correlated with the cell populations.
Figure 5Graphic representation of the effect of ENM psychochemical properties on immune cell populations. In (A), the effect of different-shaped ENMs on neutrophils is reported by showing the different mediators and signaling pathways activated. In (B), ENMs with different chemistry are shown to differently polarize macrophages.
Figure 6Genes with a dynamic dose-dependent transcriptomic profile in the four ENMs. Colors indicate the dynamic point of departure of the gene with respect to early, middle, and late time points.
Genes that are dose-dependent in all the ENMs and are correlated to at least one cell population. In dPOD column: RE stands for resilient-early, SE stands for sensitive-early. In cell population column: N stands for neutrophils, M stands for macrophages, E stands for eosinophils.
| Gene | Description | ENM | dPOD | Cell Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCL7 | chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 7 | TiO2 | RE | N, M |
| CB | SE | N | ||
| NM401 | SE | M | ||
| NRCWE26 | SE | N | ||
| CCL12 | chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 12 | TiO2 | RE | E |
| CB | RE | N | ||
| NM401 | SE | N | ||
| NRCWE26 | SE | N | ||
| IL1b | interleukin 1 beta | TiO2 | SE | E |
| CB | SE | M | ||
| NM401 | SE | M | ||
| NRCWE26 | SE | M, E |