| Literature DB >> 27169501 |
Jake Nikota1, Andrew Williams1, Carole L Yauk1, Håkan Wallin2,3, Ulla Vogel2,4, Sabina Halappanavar5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The increasing use of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) of varying physical and chemical characteristics poses a great challenge for screening and assessing the potential pathology induced by these materials, necessitating novel toxicological approaches. Toxicogenomics measures changes in mRNA levels in cells and tissues following exposure to toxic substances. The resulting information on altered gene expression profiles, associated pathways, and the doses at which these changes occur, are used to identify the underlying mechanisms of toxicity and to predict disease outcomes. We evaluated the applicability of toxicogenomics data in identifying potential lung-specific (genomic datasets are currently available from experiments where mice have been exposed to various ENMs through this common route of exposure) disease outcomes following exposure to ENMs.Entities:
Keywords: Carbon black; Carbon nanotubes; Lung disease; Lung fibrosis; Nanomaterials; TiO2 nanoparticles; Toxicogenomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27169501 PMCID: PMC4865099 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-016-0137-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
A list of the studies that were included in the meta-analysis and the experimental details
| Reference | Nanomaterial/Chemical | Route of exposure | Mouse strain | Dose | Post-exposure time point | Array platform | GSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poulsen et al | Carbon nanotubes | Intratracheal | Adult C57BL/6 | Single dose of 18, 54, 162 μg/mouse | 1, 3, and 28 days | Agilent whole genome | GSE35284 |
| Bourdon et al | Carbon black | Intratracheal | Adult C57BL/6 | Single dose of 18, 54, 162 μg/mouse | 1, 3, and 28 days | Agilent whole genome | GSE35193 |
| Halappanavar et al | Nano titanium dioxide | Inhalation | Adult C57BL/6 | 1 h daily for 11 consecutive days to 42.4 mg | 5 days | Agilent whole genome | GSE19487 |
| Guo et al | Carbon nanotubes | Pharyngeal aspirations | Adult C57BL/6 | Single dose of 0, 10, 20, 40, or 80 μg of CNT/mouse | 1, 7, 28, and 56 days | Agilent whole genome | GSE29042 |
| Reference not available | Bleomycin | Intratracheal | Adult Balb-c and C57BL6 | Single dose of 0 and 1.5 U/kg body weight | 24 h, 72 h, 10 day and 14 days | Affymetrix murine genome | GSE485 |
| Erdely et al | Gas metal arc - stainless steel welding fume | Inhalation | Adult C57BL6 | 0 or 40 mg/m3, 3 h daily for 10 consecutive days | 4 h, 14 days, 28 days | Illumina mouse bead array | GSE34056 |
| Zeidler-Erderly et al | Gas metal arc—stainless steel welding fume | Pharyngeal aspiration | Adult A/J or C57BL/6 J | Four doses of 85 mg/kg | 4 and 16 weeks | Illumina mouse bead array | GSE20174 |
| Lewis et al | 12 different lung disease model datasets including bleomycin, Th2 responses, and infection models | Differs with the model of lung disease | Differs with the model of lung disease | Differs with the model of lung disease | Differs with the model of lung disease | UCSF &Mm mouse oligo array | GSE4231 |
| Halappanavar et al | Nano titanium dioxide | Intratracheal | Adult C57BL/6 | Single dose of 18, 54, 162, or 486 μg/mouse | 1 and 28 days | Agilent whole genome | GSE60801 |
| Husain et al | Carbon Black | Intratracheal | Adult C57BL/6 | Single dose of 162 μg/mouse | 3 h, and 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, and 42 days | Agilent whole genome | GSE68036 |
| Rahman et al | Carbon nanotubes | Intratracheal | Adult C57BL/6 | 4 doses of 128 or 47.5 μg/mouse per week | 60 days | Agilent whole genome | GSE65623 |
| Thomson et al | Lung-specific TNFα over-expression | N/A | Adult C57BL/6 and transgenic mice | N/A | N/A | Agilent whole genome | GSE11037 |
The physico-chemical properties of the ENMs investigated in the studies listed in Table 1
| Reference | GSE | Name in study | Producer (particle name) | Size | BET (m2/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poulsen et al. (2015) [ | GSE35284 | CNTsmall | Nanocyl (NC-7000) | 0.85 ± 0.457 μm × 11 ± 4.5 nm | 245.8 |
| CNTlarge | IO-LE TECNanomaterials (CP-0006-SG) | 4.05 ± 2.40 μm × 67 ± 2.40 nm | 14.6 | ||
| Bourdon et al. (2012) [ | GSE35193 | CBNPs | Evonik/Degussa (Printex 90) | 14 nm | 295–338 |
| Halappanavar et al. (2011) [ | GSE19487 | NanoTiO2 | Kemira (UV-titan L181) | 20 nm | 107.7 |
| Guo et al. (2012) [ | GSE29042 | MWCNT | Mitsui & Company (MWCNT-7) | 3.86 μm × 49 ± 13.4 nm | not listed in study |
| Halappanavar et al. (2015) [ | GSE60801 | TiO2NP10.5 | NanoAmor (NRCWE-030) | 10.5 nm | 139.1 |
| TiO2NP38 | Nabond (NRCWE-025) | 38 nm | 28.2 | ||
| TiO2NP10 | NanoAmor (NRCWE-001) | 10 nm | 99 | ||
| TiO2NP10+ | NanoAmor (NRCWE-002) | 10 nm | 84 | ||
| TiO2NP20.6 | Kemira (UV-Titan L181) | 20.6 nm | 107.7 | ||
| Husain et al. (2015) [ | GSE68036 | CBNPs | Evonik/Degussa (Printex 90) | 14 nm | 295–338 |
| Rahman et al. (manuscript in preparation) | GSE65623 | Mitsui XNRi-7 | Mitsui & Company (NRCWE-006) | 5.7 ± 0.49 μm × 74 (29–173) nm | 26 |
| CNT 401 | OECD WPMNM (NM-401) | 4.0 ± 0.37 μm × 67 (24–138) nm | 18 |
Fig. 1NanoTiO and MWCNTs clustered separately, and MWCNTs were further differentiated by the post-exposure time period. Hierarchical clustering was used to visualize the differential expression of 2334 common genes across the microarray platforms used in this study and across 137 different experimental conditions from 12 studies. The figure depicts the clustering of individual arrays performed on RNA isolated from murine lung tissue within each respective study. Two distinct clusters were identified, with nanoTiO2 arrays and MWCNT arrays clustering separately. The MWCNT cluster could be further divided into two sub-clusters: (1) arrays from MWCNT exposure models were correlated with those from bacteria and bleomycin exposure models (pink); and (2) expression profiles from MWCNT exposure models were correlated with arrays from a Th2 model (blue). Other nanomaterial exposure models did not cluster in notable patterns
Fig. 2The bacteria/bleomycin cluster was enriched in DEGs associated with defensive responses to various stimuli. A short list of genes was generated for the bacteria/bleomycin cluster (highlighted in pink in Fig. 1). Genes that were differentially expressed in at least 50 % of the arrays that make up the cluster were included in the shortlist. The ClueGO app for Cytoscape software with GO Fusion was utilized to identify biological functions that were enriched in the shortlist and reduce any repetitive GOs. GOs were collapsed back to their parent GOs to further simplify data presentation. A heatmap was generated to visualize the cluster’s shortlist, organized by biological function
Fig. 3Enrichment analysis of the biological functions in the Th2 cluster involved the immune response. A short list of genes was generated for the Th2 response cluster (highlighted in blue in Fig. 1). Genes that were differentially expressed in at least 50 % of the arrays that make up the cluster were included in the shortlist. The ClueGO app for Cytoscape software with GO Fusion was utilized to identify biological functions that were enriched in the shortlist and reduce any repetitive GOs. GOs were further collapsed back to their parent GOs to further simplify data presentation. A heatmap was generated to visualize the cluster’s shortlist, organized by biological function
Fig. 4Upstream regulator analysis identifies inflammatory mediators similar to both clusters. a IPA software was used to identify the upstream regulators of the gene expression profile of the pink and blue clusters. b A Venn diagram was constructed to investigate the similarity between the genes that were increased in each of the shortlists, demonstrating the overlap between them. c The Cytoscape apps ClueGO and CluePedia created a visual network of the biological functions enriched in these overlapping genes and identified specific genes that are common to different biological functions. All but two of the GOs were grouped together based on similar gene expression patterns and are highlighted in green, with the positive regulation of transport GO being the most significantly enriched biological function in the group
Fig. 5The MWCNT sub-clusters include pro-fibrotic genes that can differentiate MWCNT from less fibrotic nanomaterials. a A list of fibrosis genes was obtained from the IPA database and the overlapping genes shortlisted in the pink and blue clusters, as well as the genes identified as upstream regulators of the pink and blue cluster shortlists, are indicated. b The fibrosis gene list from IPA was also applied to gene shortlists from CNT, TiO2, and CB datasets that were included in this meta-analysis with the same dose and time points to show the differences in gene expression between MWCNTs and other less fibrotic nanomaterials. Genes from Fig. 5a are highlighted in yellow
Fig. 6The cluster analysis indicates a potential pathway for MWCNT-induced fibrosis based on two distinct phases. In summary of the results of the cluster analysis, a pathway can be constructed representing the two phases of the lung response to the MWCNT with relation to the disease models that share similar gene expression. The genes and GOs identified in the meta-analysis are organized into the events along the pathway where they are likely involved. Due to the lack of clustering, the response to nanoTiO2 and CB could not be similarly summarized