| Literature DB >> 35745097 |
Elena S George1, Ekavi N Georgousopoulou2,3,4, Duane D Mellor5, Christina Chrysohoou6, Christos Pitsavos6, Demosthenes B Panagiotakos7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the leading cause of liver disease, affecting ~30% of the population and increasing CVD. This study aimed to explore the direct, indirect and combined effects of Mediterranean diet, NAFLD and inflammation on the 10-year CVD risk in a healthy adult population.Entities:
Keywords: Mediterranean diet; cardiovascular disease; cardiovascular risk; fatty liver index; inflammation; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745097 PMCID: PMC9229573 DOI: 10.3390/nu14122367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Flowchart describing exclusion reasons from ATTICA study to the analytical sample. NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; CRP: C-Reactive Protein.
Socio-demographic, lifestyle and clinical characteristics of the participants in respect to fatty liver index (FLI) groups at baseline (FLI: <30, 30–60, ≥60) (n = 544) 1.
| Baseline Characteristics | FLI < 30 | 30 ≤ FLI < 60 | FLI ≥ 60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, male, | 40 (21.9) * | 61 (44.5) | 82 (44.8) | <0.001 |
| Age (years) | 43.8 (13.5) * | 54.6 (14.0) | 53.5 (13.7) | <0.001 |
| Education (school years) | 12.6 (3.8) * | 10.9 (4.5) | 11.1 (4.3) | <0.001 |
| MedDietScore (0–55) | 27.5 (2.9) * | 23.8 (5.0) | 21.8 (5.0) * | <0.001 |
| Ethanol intake (g/day) ^ | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 0) | 0 (0, 20) * | <0.001 |
| Sedentary lifestyle, yes, | 176 (64.9) | 83 (60.6) | 96 (70.6) | 0.219 |
| Smoking, yes, | 127 (46.9) | 70 (51.1) | 61 (44.9) | 0.567 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.1 (2.5) * | 27.3 (2.3) | 31.5 (4.1) * | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 78.7 (9.1) | 93.0 (6.3) | 105 (8.4) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes mellitus, yes, | 7 (2.6) | 10 (7.3) | 23 (16.9) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension, yes, | 48 (18.5) | 44 (34.1) | 67 (51.1) | <0.001 |
| Hypercholesterolemia, yes, | 111 (41.0) | 83 (60.6) | 72 (25.0) | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 80.0 (59.0, 103) * | 118 (92.0, 158) | 151 (106, 228) * | <0.001 † |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L) | 0.56 (0.26, 1.51) * | 1.17 (0.62, 2.41) | 1.81 (0.99, 3.59) * | <0.001 † |
| gamma-GT (IU/L) | 14.0 (12.0, 17.0) | 19.0 (14.0, 26.0) | 24.0 (19.5, 34.0) | <0.001 † |
1 Continuous variables are presented as mean (standard deviation) if normally distributed, or as median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile) otherwise. ^ excluding females consuming more than 20 g of ethanol/day and males consuming more than 30 g of ethanol/day (*) significantly different compared to the middle category (†) indicates normal distribution not met.
Cross-sectional multivariable logistic regression model for the association between NAFLD presence and Mediterranean-type diet (n = 477) 1.
| Variable | Odds Ratio for NAFLD Presence | 95% Confidence Interval |
|---|---|---|
| MedDietScore (per 1/55) | 0.85 | (0.80, 0.91) |
| Age (per 1 year) | 0.99 | (0.97, 1.02) |
| Gender (male vs. female) | 5.05 | (2.70, 9.43) |
| Education level (per 1 school year) | 1.00 | (0.92, 1.08) |
| Smoking current, (yes vs. no) | 0.72 | (0.40, 1.31) |
| Physical activity (yes vs. no) | 0.54 | (0.29, 1.01) |
| C-reactive protein (per 1 mg/L) | 1.28 | (1.15, 1.42) |
1 Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals derived from logistic regression. NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Logistic regression models predicting 10-year CVD risk and the role of NAFLD and MedDietScore (n = 477) 1.
| Model | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| NAFLD (yes vs. no) | 2.4 (1.38, 4.29) | 1.35 (0.71, 2.58) | 0.93 (0.42, 2.03) |
| MedDietScore (per 1/55) * | 0.88 (0.84, 0.92) | 0.99 (0.85, 0.94) | 0.87 (0.80, 0.96) |
OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval; NAFLD: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. * MedDietScore consists of 11 questions and each question had six possible answers with scores 0–5. The theoretical total score ranges from 0 to 55 with higher scores indicating a higher level of adherence to Mediterranean diet. The odds ratios refer to each one-point increase in the MedDietScore. 1 Model 1: Univariable models. Model 2: MedDietScore + NAFLD. Model 3: Fully adjusted model (Model 2 + gender, age, age * tertiles of MedDietScore interaction, C-reactive protein, smoking status, sedentary lifestyle and education level.
Figure 2Structural equation model conceptualising the potential mediating role of C-Reactive protein levels on the association between fatty liver index, MedDietScore at baseline and the 10-year CVD risk. * is indicated where the relationship was statistically significant.