| Literature DB >> 35744749 |
Tonatiuh Abimael Baltazar-Díaz1, Luz Alicia González-Hernández2,3, Juan Manuel Aldana-Ledesma4, Marcela Peña-Rodríguez5, Alejandra Natali Vega-Magaña5,6, Adelaida Sara Minia Zepeda-Morales7, Rocío Ivette López-Roa7, Susana Del Toro-Arreola1, Erika Martínez-López8, Adriana María Salazar-Montes1, Miriam Ruth Bueno-Topete1.
Abstract
Gut microbiota undergoes profound alterations in alcohol cirrhosis. Microbiota-derived products, e.g., short chain fatty acids (SCFA), regulate the homeostasis of the gut-liver axis. The objective was to evaluate the composition and functions of the intestinal microbiota in patients with alcohol-decompensated cirrhosis. Fecal samples of 18 patients and 18 healthy controls (HC) were obtained. Microbial composition was characterized by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, SCFA quantification was performed by gas chromatography (GC), and metagenomic predictive profiles were analyzed by PICRUSt2. Gut microbiota in the cirrhosis group revealed a significant increase in the pathogenic/pathobionts genera Escherichia/Shigella and Prevotella, a decrease in beneficial bacteria, such as Blautia, Faecalibacterium, and a decreased α-diversity (p < 0.001) compared to HC. Fecal SCFA concentrations were significantly reduced in the cirrhosis group (p < 0.001). PICRUSt2 analysis indicated a decrease in acetyl-CoA fermentation to butyrate, as well as an increase in pathways related to antibiotics resistance, and aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. These metabolic pathways have been poorly described in the progression of alcohol-related decompensated cirrhosis. The gut microbiota of these patients possesses a pathogenic/inflammatory environment; therefore, future strategies to balance intestinal dysbiosis should be implemented. These findings are described for the first time in the population of western Mexico.Entities:
Keywords: Escherichia; SCFA; alcohol; butyrate; liver cirrhosis; microbiome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35744749 PMCID: PMC9229093 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10061231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants.
| Characteristics | Healthy Controls | Cirrhosis ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age (years) | 48.72 ± 8.63 | 49.89 ± 11.49 | 0.733 a |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.85 ± 2.86 | 24.66 ± 3.82 | 0.355 b |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 15.1 ± 0.9 | 8.66 ± 2.4 | 0.000 a |
| Platelets (109/µL) | 229.59 ± 63.5 | 140.32 ± 90.18 | <0.002 a |
| White blood cells (109/µL) | 5.68 ± 1.42 | 17.13 ± 14.23 | 0.000 b |
| Neutrophils (109/µL) | 3.29 ± 1.05 | 14.01 ± 12.92 | 0.000 b |
| Lymphocytes (109/µL) | 1.8 ± 0.43 | 1.53 ± 0.94 | <0.001 b |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.67 ± 0.17 | 7.72 ± 8.99 | 0.000 b |
| Direct bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.13 ± 0.05 | 2.26 ± 3.74 | <0.002 b |
| GGT (IU/L) | 25.67 ± 13.07 | 116.22 ± 92.83 | 0.000 b |
| Albumin (g/dL) | 4.47 ± 0.32 | 2.1 ± 0.58 | 0.000 b |
| ALT (U/L) | 26.94 ± 12.91 | 31 ± 17.07 | 0.284 a |
| AST (IU/L) | 22.89 ± 9.23 | 79.06 ± 46.98 | 0.000 b |
| ALP (IU/L) | 69.67 ± 22.21 | 142.39 ± 59.78 | 0.000 b |
| Total protein (g/dL) | 7.16 ± 0.47 | 2.94 ± 1.35 | 0.000 b |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.82 ± 0.12 | 1.42 ± 0.86 | <0.008 b |
| Prothrombin time (s) | 11.49 ± 0.77 | 23.26 ± 8.55 | 0.000 b |
| INR | 1.09 ± 0.08 | 2.13 ± 0.79 | 0.000 b |
| Sodium (mmol/L) | N/A | 131.94 ± 6.46 | N/A |
| Child–Pugh score | N/A | 11.39 ± 1.33 | N/A |
| MELD-Na score | N/A | 28.11 ± 6.69 | N/A |
| Prior or actual HE | N/A | 16 (88.9) | N/A |
| West Haven grade (1/2/3/4) | N/A | 1/8/7/0 | N/A |
| Ascites | N/A | 14 (77.8) | N/A |
| Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) | N/A | 6 (33.3) | N/A |
| Acute kidney injury | N/A | 5 (27.8) | N/A |
| Lactulose | N/A | 18 (100) | N/A |
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | N/A | 78.06 ± 12.05 | N/A |
| Duration of antibiotic treatment (days) | N/A | 3.94 ± 4.15 | N/A |
| Antibiotic type c ( | 0 | 18 | N/A |
| Only ceftriaxone | - | 4 | |
| Ceftriaxone + rifaximin | - | 5 | |
| Ceftriaxone + other | - | 3 | |
| Others | - | 6 | |
| Use of proton pump inhibitors | 0 (0) | 8 (44.4) | N/A |
| Infection at admission | N/A | 10 (55.6) | N/A |
| Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio | 1.87 ± 0.58 | 10.01 ± 10.46 | 0.000 b |
| AST/ALT ratio | 0.93 ± 0.26 | 5.89 ± 1.57 | 0.000 b |
| APRI index | 0.22 ± 0.13 | 1.49 ± 1.16 | 0.000 b |
| FIB-4 index | 1.1 ± 0.66 | 6.55 ± 4.04 | 0.000 b |
Abbreviations: N/A (not assessed), BMI (body mass index), HE (hepatic encephalopathy), MELD-Na (Model for End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium), GGT (gamma-glutamyltransferase), AST (aspartate aminotransferase), ALT (alanine aminotransferase), ALP (alkaline phosphatase), INR (international normalized ratio), APRI (AST to Platelet Ratio Index). Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation or number of patients (%). a Student’s t-test, b Mann-Whitney U test. c Antibiotic treatment was categorized in 4 groups: only ceftriaxone, ceftriaxone plus rifaximin, ceftriaxone plus other, and others (clarithromycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, linezolid, metronidazole, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin). Patients could receive more than one antibiotic.
Figure 1Microbiota richness and diversity. (A) Alpha diversity indices: Observed features, Shannon and Chao1 indices of healthy controls group compared with patients with cirrhosis. Mann-Whitney U test, *** p < 0.001; (B) Beta diversity plots for weighted and unweighted (C) UniFrac distances in cirrhosis group (red) and healthy control group (HC, blue). PERMANOVA tested, p < 0.001 in both cases.
Figure 2Relative abundance plots of healthy controls group (HC) and patients with cirrhosis group. (A) Pie chart representing different phyla in both groups. Phyla are accompanied by relative abundance value (%); (B) Stacked bar plot of bacterial familiae in HC group and cirrhosis group (A); on the right, increased abundance of Enterobacteriaceae in cirrhosis group are observed, while increased abundance of Lachnospiraceae, Oscillospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae are characteristic of HC group. Below (C), stacked bar plot of bacterial genera in HC group and cirrhosis group; in concordance with previous plot, on the right increased abundance of Escherichia/Shigella is characteristic of cirrhosis group, whereas Eubacterium, Blautia and Fusicatenibacter abundance exhibit a significantly increased abundance in HC group. Mann-Whitney U test, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3LEfSe analysis identifying key taxa in intestinal microbiota from patients with cirrhosis versus healthy control group (HC). (A) Bar plot showing LDA scores (Log > 4; p < 0.05); (B) Cladogram showing differentially abundant taxa at phylum, class, family, and genus levels between the two groups. Red circles indicate the remarkable taxa in the cirrhosis group while the green designates the HC group.
Figure 4PICRUSt2 functional prediction of the patients with cirrhosis (red) compared with healthy controls (HC, purple). (A) Comparisons among MetaCyc pathways shown by mean proportion and difference in mean proportions; (B) Most relevant pathways are shown individually. The analysis was done with Welch’s inverted method, p-values were filtered with a cut-off value of p < 0.05.
Figure 5Short-chain fatty acids assessment in healthy controls (HC) and cirrhotic patients. The figure shows separate concentrations of acetic, propionic, butyric acids and total SCFAs. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test, *** p < 0.001.