| Literature DB >> 31004827 |
Chang Mu Sung1, Yu-Fei Lin2, Kuan-Fu Chen3, Huei-Mien Ke2, Hao-Yi Huang4, Yu-Nong Gong5, Wen-Sy Tsai6, Jeng-Fu You6, Meiyeh J Lu2, Hao-Tsai Cheng1, Cheng-Yu Lin4, Chia-Jung Kuo4, Isheng J Tsai7, Sen-Yung Hsieh8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gut dysbiosis plays a role in hepatic encephalopathy (HE), while its relationship at the acute episode of overt HE (AHE), the disease progression and clinical outcomes remains unclear. We aimed to identify AHE-specific microbiome and its association to patients' outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Gut Dysbiosis; Gut Microbiota; Gut-Liver-Brain Axis; Veillonella parvula
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31004827 PMCID: PMC6718362 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.04.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2352-345X
Clinical Characteristics of the Subjects in Study
| Group | C1 | C2 | C3 | D1 | D2 | D3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 13 | 20 | 15 | 62 | 34 | 18 |
| Women/men | 6/7 | 8/12 | 3/12 | 13/49 | 2/32 | 4/17 |
| Age, y | 47.2 ± 10.2 | 61 ± 8.4 | 58.1 ± 12.3 | 56.7 ± 12.2 | 55.3 ± 11.5 | 55.4 ± 11.5 |
| Antibiotics used (Y/N) | 0/20 | 33/27 | 17/17 | 10/11 | ||
| MELD score | 16.8 ± 5.58 | 18.5 ± 6 | 18.5 ± 6.3 | 14.8 ± 4 | ||
| Liver cirrhosis CTP A/B/C | none | 18/2/0 | 0/8/7 | 0/22/40 | 0/11/23 | 0/10/11 |
| Total bilirubin, mg/dL | 1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 3.5 ± 3.7 | 5.2 ± 5.3 | 5.4 ± 6 | 2.8 ± 1.8 |
| Albumin, g/dL | 4 ± 0.4 | 3 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.6 | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 3 ± 0.6 | |
| INR | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | |
| Creatine, mg/dL | 1 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 1.4 | 1.4 ± 1.1 | 1.4 ± 1.2 | 1.1 ± 0.5 |
| AST, U/L | 24.6 ± 4.6 | 44.4 ± 16.4 | 68.9 ± 44 | 109 ± 159.8 | 81.8 ± 66 | 67.9 ± 55.6 |
| ALT, U/L | 21.8 ± 7.4 | 37.5 ± 18.9 | 51.7 ± 46.8 | 44 ± 36.4 | 37.5 ± 20.9 | 32.4 ± 15.1 |
| Platelet, 1000/UL | 254.5 ± 42.1 | 112.2 ± 55.5 | 100.7 ± 28.8 | 84.2 ± 44.3 | 88.6 ± 48.4 | 88.4 ± 35.4 |
| PPI used (Y/N) | 3/10 | 6/14 | 4/11 | 22/40 | 10/24 | 4/14 |
| Hepatic encephalopathy history (Y/N) | none | 0/20 | 4/11 | 41/19 | 25/9 | 16/5 |
| Outcome within 1 year: dead/HE recurrence | 19/26 | |||||
| Cirrhosis risk: HBV/HCV/alcoholic/others | 0/0/7/0 | 15/6/3/0 | 6/2/8/0 | 18/19/36/4 | 10/11/21/5 | 7/5/14/1 |
Values are n or mean ± SD. MELD score = 10 * ((0.957 * ln(Creatinine)) + (0.378 * ln(Bilirubin)) + (1.12 * ln(INR))) + 6.43.
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; C1, healthy individuals; C2, well-compensated cirrhosis; C3, decompensated cirrhosis without hepatic encephalopathy; CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh; D1, acute hepatic encephalopathy at emergency room; D2, after 48–72 h of treatment; D3, recovered 3 months after the hepatic encephalopathy episode; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HE, hepatic encephalopathy; INR, international normalization ratio of patient's prothrombin time/normalized prothrombin time; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; N, no; PPI, proton pump inhibitor; Y, yes.
Figure 1Rarefaction curves of all 16S amplicon samples from patients.
Figure 2(. Significances of different diversity between samples were assessed by Tukey’s HSD (*P < .05; **P < .01; ***P < .001; ****P < .0001). (B) AHE patients at different stages shift microbial community structure. Samples from both control groups are not distinct from each other (C1 and C2). Samples from AHE patients were shifted away from control groups according to their disease status (D1, D2, and D3). D3 is relatively overlapping with C3 (decompensated cirrhosis without recent HE).
Figure 3Relative abundance of OTUs in healthy patients (top, C1), control cirrhosis patients (middle, C2), and advanced cirrhosis patients (bottom, C3) at the phylum and genus levels. Only the top 30 most abundant OTUs in each group are shown.
Figure 4Relative abundance of OTUs in AHE patients (top), AHE patients during treatment (middle), and recovered AHE patients (bottom) at the phylum and genus levels. Only the top 30 most abundant OTUs in each group are shown.
Figure 5(. Boxplots show the median and interquartile range of relative abundances (%). Dots represent the relative abundances of samples. (B) Different combinations of phyla/Bacteroidetes ratios in distinguishing D1 from C2 and C3.
Paired Comparison (With DAOTU P < .05)
| Group1 | Group2 | DAOTUs with | More Abundant in Group 1 | More Abundant in Group 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | C2 | 15 | 5 | 10 |
| C2 | C3 | 26 | 21 | 5 |
| C2 | D1 | 127 | 87 | 40 |
| C3 | D1 | 70 | 26 | 44 |
| D1 | D2 | 84 | 71 | 13 |
| D2 | D3 | 94 | 17 | 77 |
| D1 (n = 62) | D3 (n = 18) | 71 | 24 | 47 |
| D1 (n = 18) | D3 (n = 18) | 42 | 17 | 25 |
C1, healthy individuals; C2, well-compensated cirrhosis; C3, decompensated cirrhosis without hepatic encephalopathy; CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh; D1, acute hepatic encephalopathy at emergency room; D2, after 48–72 h of treatment; D3, recovered 3 months after the hepatic encephalopathy episode; DAOTU, differentially abundant operational taxonomic unit between Group 1 and Group2.
Relative Abundance of OTU3 Across All Samples
| Disease Status | Relative Abundance of OTU3 (%) |
|---|---|
| C1 | 0.01 |
| C1 | 0.03 |
| C1 | 0.03 |
| C1 | 0.05 |
| C1 | 0.09 |
| C1 | 0.14 |
| C1 | 0.15 |
| C1 | 0.16 |
| C1 | 0.29 |
| C1 | 0.31 |
| C1 | 0.42 |
| C1 | 0.79 |
| C1 | 7.07 |
| C2 | 0.00 |
| C2 | 0.01 |
| C2 | 0.02 |
| C2 | 0.02 |
| C2 | 0.04 |
| C2 | 0.04 |
| C2 | 0.11 |
| C2 | 0.12 |
| C2 | 0.14 |
| C2 | 0.22 |
| C2 | 0.26 |
| C2 | 0.43 |
| C2 | 0.92 |
| C2 | 1.01 |
| C2 | 1.25 |
| C2 | 1.27 |
| C2 | 1.49 |
| C2 | 2.95 |
| C2 | 4.98 |
| C2 | 6.42 |
| C3 | 0.01 |
| C3 | 0.01 |
| C3 | 0.05 |
| C3 | 0.06 |
| C3 | 0.14 |
| C3 | 0.95 |
| C3 | 1.24 |
| C3 | 1.97 |
| C3 | 2.05 |
| C3 | 6.56 |
| C3 | 7.30 |
| C3 | 10.30 |
| C3 | 16.04 |
| C3 | 21.27 |
| C3 | 22.27 |
| D1 | 0.01 |
| D1 | 0.02 |
| D1 | 0.03 |
| D1 | 0.03 |
| D1 | 0.07 |
| D1 | 0.08 |
| D1 | 0.14 |
| D1 | 0.42 |
| D1 | 0.42 |
| D1 | 0.45 |
| D1 | 0.75 |
| D1 | 0.75 |
| D1 | 1.29 |
| D1 | 1.55 |
| D1 | 2.18 |
| D1 | 2.24 |
| D1 | 2.95 |
| D1 | 3.11 |
| D1 | 3.46 |
| D1 | 3.65 |
| D1 | 4.30 |
| D1 | 4.48 |
| D1 | 4.86 |
| D1 | 5.05 |
| D1 | 5.29 |
| D1 | 5.30 |
| D1 | 5.32 |
| D1 | 5.45 |
| D1 | 5.63 |
| D1 | 5.65 |
| D1 | 5.70 |
| D1 | 5.72 |
| D1 | 5.74 |
| D1 | 6.30 |
| D1 | 7.16 |
| D1 | 7.25 |
| D1 | 7.92 |
| D1 | 8.08 |
| D1 | 8.10 |
| D1 | 8.18 |
| D1 | 8.84 |
| D1 | 10.00 |
| D1 | 10.76 |
| D1 | 13.28 |
| D1 | 13.29 |
| D1 | 13.58 |
| D1 | 16.40 |
| D1 | 17.07 |
| D1 | 17.72 |
| D1 | 18.89 |
| D1 | 21.69 |
| D1 | 26.53 |
| D1 | 27.02 |
| D1 | 27.26 |
| D1 | 29.64 |
| D1 | 30.06 |
| D1 | 30.48 |
| D1 | 30.85 |
| D1 | 32.01 |
| D1 | 41.20 |
| D1 | 50.09 |
| D1 | 50.72 |
| D2 | 0.08 |
| D2 | 0.11 |
| D2 | 0.11 |
| D2 | 0.12 |
| D2 | 0.13 |
| D2 | 0.15 |
| D2 | 0.19 |
| D2 | 0.24 |
| D2 | 0.33 |
| D2 | 0.34 |
| D2 | 0.35 |
| D2 | 0.62 |
| D2 | 0.62 |
| D2 | 0.69 |
| D2 | 1.71 |
| D2 | 1.96 |
| D2 | 1.99 |
| D2 | 2.75 |
| D2 | 3.94 |
| D2 | 6.91 |
| D2 | 7.72 |
| D2 | 11.05 |
| D2 | 12.62 |
| D2 | 15.19 |
| D2 | 15.64 |
| D2 | 17.72 |
| D2 | 18.46 |
| D2 | 21.90 |
| D2 | 23.11 |
| D2 | 28.78 |
| D2 | 29.64 |
| D2 | 35.60 |
| D2 | 44.66 |
| D2 | 53.28 |
| D3 | 0.01 |
| D3 | 0.01 |
| D3 | 0.08 |
| D3 | 0.15 |
| D3 | 0.31 |
| D3 | 0.32 |
| D3 | 0.44 |
| D3 | 0.87 |
| D3 | 0.90 |
| D3 | 1.36 |
| D3 | 2.05 |
| D3 | 3.04 |
| D3 | 3.97 |
| D3 | 6.28 |
| D3 | 6.69 |
| D3 | 12.20 |
| D3 | 20.92 |
| D3 | 47.96 |
OTU3, operational taxonomic unit 3.
The 16 OTUs With Significantly Different Abundance Between C3 and D1 and With the Mean Abundance at Least 1%
| OTU_ID | C1 | C2 | C3 | D1 | D2 | D3 | Adjusted | Recovered in D3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||
| Otu73 | 0.288 | 0.710 | 0.780 | 2.714 | 0.029 | 0.085 | 1.172 | 2.924 | 0.202 | 1.097 | 3.526 | 8.696 | .000 | No | |
| Otu40 | 0.037 | 0.112 | 0.452 | 1.551 | 1.031 | 1.861 | 1.105 | 1.518 | 1.105 | 3.317 | 1.258 | 4.720 | .022 | No | |
| Otu3 | 0.736 | 1.916 | 1.085 | 1.758 | 6.015 | 7.910 | 11.007 | 12.473 | 10.549 | 14.133 | 5.976 | 11.785 | .017 | No | |
| Otu16 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.024 | 0.020 | 0.031 | 1.369 | 5.038 | 9.645 | 18.166 | 0.160 | 0.484 | .039 | No | |
| Otu46 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.011 | 0.017 | 1.086 | 3.184 | 1.855 | 9.842 | 0.714 | 2.613 | .003 | No | |
| XI | Otu31 | 0.007 | 0.019 | 0.008 | 0.028 | 0.039 | 0.081 | 1.603 | 7.644 | 0.034 | 0.132 | 0.132 | 0.345 | .028 | No |
| Otu60 | 0.004 | 0.009 | 0.476 | 1.616 | 0.022 | 0.084 | 1.254 | 4.101 | 0.510 | 1.543 | 3.492 | 11.627 | .000 | No | |
| Otu93 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 1.192 | 5.317 | 0.002 | 0.005 | 1.487 | 4.098 | 0.526 | 2.298 | 0.880 | 3.121 | .000 | No | |
| sedis | Otu19 | 1.871 | 2.922 | 1.311 | 2.721 | 1.788 | 2.986 | 0.401 | 0.923 | 0.155 | 0.533 | 1.134 | 2.826 | .001 | Yes |
| Otu29 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.205 | 0.916 | 1.635 | 6.154 | 0.050 | 0.390 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.001 | .027 | No | |
| Otu12 | 5.443 | 6.557 | 5.021 | 5.913 | 1.607 | 2.290 | 1.780 | 4.062 | 1.070 | 4.475 | 0.899 | 2.285 | .001 | Yes | |
| Otu6 | 2.423 | 3.383 | 1.381 | 1.718 | 1.623 | 2.030 | 2.417 | 4.898 | 1.017 | 4.020 | 5.117 | 12.504 | .040 | Yes | |
| Otu8 | 6.020 | 5.370 | 2.687 | 3.227 | 6.290 | 7.899 | 4.051 | 6.931 | 0.982 | 2.411 | 7.990 | 9.865 | .000 | Yes | |
| Otu2 | 15.265 | 12.722 | 9.060 | 6.392 | 12.069 | 8.806 | 7.128 | 10.163 | 3.470 | 6.150 | 5.869 | 9.434 | .000 | Yes | |
| Otu14 | 1.889 | 3.663 | 4.176 | 8.492 | 3.571 | 8.650 | 1.591 | 4.525 | 0.771 | 2.862 | 0.892 | 3.775 | .005 | No | |
| Otu11 | 1.419 | 2.389 | 2.151 | 3.227 | 1.334 | 2.269 | 0.788 | 2.946 | 0.693 | 3.835 | 0.083 | 0.201 | .016 | No | |
OTU, operational taxonomic unit.
Figure 6Distribution of relative abundances for 16 signature OTUs at the C2, C3, D1, and D3 stages. Boxplots show the median and interquartile range of relative abundance (%). Red dots denote mean relative abundances of each category, the raw values of which are listed in Table 3. Arrowheads indicate those whose abundances related to clinical outcomes.
Figure 7Phylogenetic tree of .
Figure 8Whole genome alignment between the reconstructed OTU3 genome vs the Te3 . Dashed line indicates scaffold boundaries and purple dots/line denote matched alignment.
Differential Abundant Genera Between Episodic Recurrence of Hepatic Encephalopathy
| Mean Relative Abundance (%) | Abundance in Recurrent Patients | Adjusted | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Recurrence | Recurrence | |||
| 3.501 | 1.170 | Reduced | .0070 | |
| 1.256 | 1.257 | Increased | .0070 | |
| 0.564 | 1.781 | Increased | .0033 | |
| 1.681 | 0.290 | Reduced | .0042 | |
| 11.661 | 17.216 | Increased | .0076 | |
| 2.028 | 0.876 | Reduced | .0090 | |
| 2.529 | 1.151 | Reduced | .0086 | |
Figure 9(. (B) Scatterplot of the relative abundances of OTU7 at AHE stage against the number of recurrence (Pearson’s r = –0.26, P = .046). (C) Boxplots of relative abundances for 5 OTUs that were with significantly different abundance between patients with different mortality outcome.
Figure 10The abundances of control cirrhosis–enriched and AHE-enriched KEGG functional terms. Abundances were plotted as transformed values from counts of inferred KEGG orthologues. For visualization comparison, abundances from healthy individuals were also plotted.