| Literature DB >> 35742445 |
Juntip Namsawang1,2, Pornpimol Muanjai1,2.
Abstract
Electrical stimulation is an established method that is used to improve muscle strength. The present study compared changes in the navicular drop test (NDT), muscle size, the five times sit to stand (5TSTS) test, the timed up and go (TUG) test, and the risk of falls in response to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) plus short foot exercise (SFE) and SFE alone in 68 healthy elderly participants aged 65-75 years. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: TENS plus SFE and SFE alone (with sham TENS). Measurements of NDT, muscle size, 5TSTS, TUG, and risk of falls were made before and after 4 weeks of training. The NDT was significantly improved by a median of 0.31 mm in the TENS plus SFE group and 0.64 mm in the SFE alone group (p < 0.001). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I), 5TSTS, and TUG for both groups (p < 0.001). The abductor hallucis muscle size increased by 0.23 cm2 in the TENS plus SFE group and 0.26 cm2 in the SFE alone group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups for any variables (p > 0.05) except TUG, which showed a greater improvement in the TENS plus SFE group (p = 0.008). Our findings demonstrated that TENS plus SFE and SFE alone improved intrinsic foot muscle size. However, TENS plus SFE tended to improve NDT more than SFE alone, particularly in cases of severe muscle weakness. Thus, the combined use of TENS plus SFE could be recommended for muscle strengthening and balance programs for fall prevention in older adults.Entities:
Keywords: abductor hallucis muscle; cross-sectional area; elderly; electrical stimulation; functional test; intrinsic foot exercise
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742445 PMCID: PMC9223504 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Physical characteristics and pre-measurements of participants of the study (n = 68).
| TENS + SFE ( | SFE Alone ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 68.6 ± 4.6 | 68.7 ± 4.0 |
| Sex | 6 Males, 28 females | 6 Males, 28 females |
| Weight (Kg) | 59.9 ± 11.3 | 60.7 ± 11.5 |
| Height (cm) | 158.6 ± 9.6 | 158.9 ± 8.2 |
| BMI (Kg∙m−2) | 23.8 ± 3.7 | 23.9 ± 3.1 |
| NDT (mm) | 6.01 ± 1.61 | 5.96 ± 3.03 |
| FES-I (points) | 27.7 ± 10.2 | 26.4 ± 7.1 |
| CSA of AbdH (cm2) | 1.93 ± 0.49 | 1.86 ± 0.50 |
| 5TSTS (s) | 6.58 ± 1.68 | 7.53 ± 1.78 |
| TUG (s) | 6.98 ± 1.53 | 7.77 ± 1.75 |
BMI, body mass index; NDT, navicular drop test; FES-I, Falls Efficacy Scale International; CSA, cross sectional area; AbdH, abductor hallucis muscle; 5TSTS, 5 times sit to stand; TUG, timed up and go.
Figure 1Flow chart of the participants. TENS, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; SFE, short foot exercise.
Median and interquartile range of outcome measures before and after 4 weeks TENS combined SFE and SFE alone (n = 68).
| TENS + SFE ( | SFE Alone ( | Between Groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | ||
| NDT (mm) | 5.57 (4.80, 6.81) | 4.71 (4.15, 5.61) * | 5.16 (3.56, 8.04) | 4.60 (2.98, 4.60) * | 0.64 |
| FES-I (points) | 27.0 (19.0, 36.3) | 19 (16.0, 22.3) * | 25.0 (20.8, 31.0) | 21.0 (17.0, 25.0) * | 0.83 |
| CSA of AbdH (cm2) | 1.86 (1.61, 2.31) | 2.05(1.76, 2.53) * | 1.79 (1.56, 2.20) | 2.16 (1.77, 2.50) * | 0.49 |
| 5TSTS (s) | 6.52 (5.50, 7.87) | 5.61 (4.99, 6.25) * | 7.53 (6.10, 8.40) | 6.10 (5.36, 7.84)* | 0.68 |
| TUG (s) | 6.62 (6.15, 7.67) | 5.88 (5.43, 6.49) * | 7.41 (6.47, 8.90) | 6.67 (6.03, 8.25) * | 0.008 |
* indicated p < 0.05 the difference between pre and post 4 weeks of training. NDT, navicular drop test; FES-I, Falls Efficacy Scale International; CSA, cross sectional area; AbdH, abductor hallucis muscle; 5TSTS, 5 times sit to stand; TUG, timed up and go.
Figure 2Changes in NDT score as a result of 4 weeks training in relation to the NDT baseline score. Solid line and symbols, SFE group; dashed line and open symbols, TENS + SFE group.