| Literature DB >> 33019530 |
Du-Jin Park1, Young-In Hwang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In recent years, a three-dimensional ankle exercise has been proposed as a practice for strengthening the intrinsic foot muscles, however this topic still requires further research. This study aimed to compare the activities of the intrinsic muscles in healthy participants during 3D foot-ankle exercises, namely, short foot (SF), and toe spread out (TSO).Entities:
Keywords: foot–ankle exercise; intrinsic foot muscle; proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation; short foot; toe spread out
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33019530 PMCID: PMC7578945 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Descriptive statistics of the study participants (n = 16).
| Variable | Mean ± SD 1 |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 27.44 ± 2.58 |
| Height (cm) | 166.19 ± 6.80 |
| Weight (kg) | 59.75 ± 9.54 |
| BMI 2 (kg/m2) | 21.57 ± 2.62 |
| Sex | Male 8 (50%), female 8 (50%) |
| Dominant foot | Right = 13 (81.2%), left = 3 (18.8%) |
1 SD: standard deviation; 2 BMI: body mass index.
Figure 1Diagram of the study design. ROM: range of motion; EMG: electromyogram; 3D: 3-dimensional; ANOVA: analysis of variance.
Figure 2Developed EMG foot plate: (A) top view, (B) bottom view.
Figure 3Short foot exercise: (A) start, (B) end.
Figure 4Toe spread out exercise: (A) start, (B) end.
Figure 5D1 patterns: (A) plantarflexion–pronation–eversion with toe flexion, (B) dorsiflexion–supination–inversion with toe extension.
Figure 6D2 patterns: (A) plantarflexion–supination–inversion with toe flexion, (B) dorsiflexion–pronation–eversion with toe extension.
Descriptive statistics of normalised electromyogram data of the four muscles and abductor hallucis/adductor hallucis ratio during foot strengthening exercises (n = 16).
| Variable | SF 5 | TSO 6 | D1F 7 | D1E 8 | D2F 9 | D2E 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AbH 1 (%MVIC) * | 65.06 ± 28.01 | 80.84 ± 26.33 | 61.41 ± 21.33 | 76.48 ± 30.40 | 51.00 ± 17.20 | 78.97 ± 22.00 |
| AdH 2 (%MVIC) | 92.36 ± 8.16 | 88.10 ± 7.66 | 86.18 ± 7.40 | 93.37 ± 10.49 | 88.95 ± 5.84 | 92.96 ± 8.17 |
| EHL 3 (%MVIC) * | 49.16 ± 16.44 | 52.92 ± 19.37 | 68.14 ± 19.37 | 53.75 ± 14.22 | 73.19 ± 22.83 | 49.35 ± 11.56 |
| FHB 4 (%MVIC) * | 95.96 ± 19.54 | 90.09 ± 19.40 | 84.58 ± 31.35 | 105.14 ± 35.15 | 72.28 ± 19.35 | 97.23 ± 27.97 |
| AbH/AdH ratio * | 0.70 ± 0.28 | 0.92 ± 0.29 | 0.71 ± 0.23 | 0.81 ± 0.29 | 0.58 ± 0.22 | 0.85 ± 0.22 |
1 AbH: abductor hallucis, 2 AdH: adductor hallucis, 3 EHL: extensor hallucis longus, 4 FHB: flexor hallucis brevis, 5 SF: short foot exercise, 6 TSO: toe spread out, 7 D1F: diagonal 1 flexion pattern, 8 D1E: diagonal 1 extension pattern, 9 D2F: diagonal 2 flexion pattern, 10 D2E: diagonal 2 extension pattern, * p < 0.05.
Figure 7Comparison of the activation of abductor hallucis and extensor hallucis longus during foot–ankle exercises. * p < 0.05.
Figure 8Comparison of the activation of flexor hallucis brevis and AbH/AdH ratio during foot–ankle exercises. * p < 0.05.