Literature DB >> 24568226

The relationship among foot posture, core and lower extremity muscle function, and postural stability.

Stephen C Cobb1, David M Bazett-Jones, Mukta N Joshi, Jennifer E Earl-Boehm, C Roger James.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Identification of impaired balance as a risk factor for lower extremity injury regardless of injury history has led to subsequent investigation of variables that may adversely affect balance in healthy individuals.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relationship among core and lower extremity muscle function, foot posture, and balance.
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
SETTING: Musculoskeletal injury biomechanics laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 108 individuals (40 men, 68 women; age = 22.8 ± 4.7 years, height = 168.5 ± 10.4 cm, mass = 69.9 ± 13.3 kg) participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Core endurance was assessed during 1 time-to-failure trial, and isometric hip and ankle strength were assessed using a handheld dynamometer and isokinetic dynamometer, respectively. Foot structure was quantified using the digital photographic measurement method. Single-limb-stance time to boundary was assessed using a force plate during an eyes-closed condition. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were performed to predict balance using lower extremity strength, foot posture, and core endurance.
RESULTS: Foot posture (β = -0.22, P = .03) and ankle-inversion strength (β = -0.29, P = .006) predicted mediolateral balance. Increasing arch posture and ankle-inversion strength were associated with decreased mediolateral single-limb-stance balance.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing arch height was associated with decreased mediolateral control of single-limb stance. The relationship between time to boundary and injury risk, however, has not been explored. Therefore, the relationship between increasing arch height and injury due to postural instability cannot be determined from this study. If authors of future prospective studies identify a relationship between decreased time to boundary and increased injury risk, foot structure may be an important variable to assess during preparticipation physical examinations. The relationship between increasing ankle-inversion strength and decreased balance may require additional study to further elucidate the relationship between ankle strength and balance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24568226      PMCID: PMC3975772          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.2.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  23 in total

1.  Postural orientation: age-related changes in variability and time-to-boundary.

Authors:  E E H van Wegen; R E A van Emmerik; G E Riccio
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes.

Authors:  Darin T Leetun; Mary Lloyd Ireland; John D Willson; Bryon T Ballantyne; Irene McClay Davis
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Deficits in time-to-boundary measures of postural control with chronic ankle instability.

Authors:  Jay Hertel; Lauren C Olmsted-Kramer
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Ankle eversion to inversion strength ratio and static balance control in the dominant and non-dominant limbs of young adults.

Authors:  Wei-Hsiu Lin; Ying-Fang Liu; City Chin-Cheng Hsieh; Alex J Y Lee
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.319

5.  Endurance times for low back stabilization exercises: clinical targets for testing and training from a normal database.

Authors:  S M McGill; A Childs; C Liebenson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Body weight is a strong predictor of postural stability.

Authors:  Olivier Hue; Martin Simoneau; Julie Marcotte; Félix Berrigan; Jean Doré; Picard Marceau; Simon Marceau; Angelo Tremblay; Normand Teasdale
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Differences in Postural Control During Single-Leg Stance Among Healthy Individuals With Different Foot Types.

Authors:  Jay Hertel; Michael R Gay; Craig R Denegar
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  A prospective study of ankle injury risk factors.

Authors:  J F Baumhauer; D M Alosa; A F Renström; S Trevino; B Beynnon
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Interrater reliability of subtalar neutral, calcaneal inversion and eversion.

Authors:  K Smith-Oricchio; B A Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Hip isometric strength following knee surgery.

Authors:  J Jaramillo; T W Worrell; C D Ingersoll
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  9 in total

1.  Combined Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Short Foot Exercise Improves Navicular Height, Muscle Size, Function Mobility, and Risk of Falls in Healthy Older Adults.

Authors:  Juntip Namsawang; Pornpimol Muanjai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Does the lower extremity alignment affect the risk of falling?

Authors:  Gülnur Taşçı Bozbaş; Gülcan Gürer
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-10-03

3.  Clinical measures of static foot posture do not agree.

Authors:  Ben Langley; Mary Cramp; Stewart C Morrison
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Feet deformities and their close association with postural stability deficits in children aged 10-15 years.

Authors:  Beata Szczepanowska-Wolowiec; Paulina Sztandera; Ireneusz Kotela; Marek Zak
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Foot Posture Index Reference Values among Young Adults in Saudi Arabia and Their Association with Anthropometric Determinants, Balance, Functional Mobility, and Hypermobility.

Authors:  Khalid A Alahmari; Venkata Nagaraj Kakaraparthi; Ravi Shankar Reddy; Paul Silvian Samuel; Jaya Shanker Tedla; Kanagaraj Rengaramanujam; Irshad Ahmad; Devika Rani Sangadala; Debjani Mukherjee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Comparison of ankle force, mobility, flexibility, and plantar pressure values in athletes according to foot posture index.

Authors:  Hülya Kalender; Kubilay Uzuner; Deniz Şimşek; İsmail Bayram
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-01

7.  Mobility and Balance and Their Correlation with Physiological Factors in Elderly with Different Foot Postures.

Authors:  Aisyah Mohd Said; Haidzir Manaf; Saiful Adli Bukry; Maria Justine
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Range of motion, muscle length, and balance performance in older adults with normal, pronated, and supinated feet.

Authors:  Maria Justine; Dhiya Ruzali; Ezzaty Hazidin; Aisyah Said; Saiful Adli Bukry; Haidzir Manaf
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-03-31

9.  Monitoring the Role of Physical Activity in Children with Flat Feet by Assessing Subtalar Flexibility and Plantar Arch Index.

Authors:  Ligia Rusu; Mihnea Ion Marin; Michi Mihail Geambesa; Mihai Robert Rusu
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.