| Literature DB >> 35742230 |
Myo Nyein Aung1,2,3, Yuka Koyanagi1,4, Yuiko Nagamine5, Eun Woo Nam6, Nadila Mulati1, Myat Yadana Kyaw1, Saiyud Moolphate7, Yoshihisa Shirayama1,3, Kumiko Nonaka8, Malcolm Field9,10, Paul Cheung11, Motoyuki Yuasa1,3.
Abstract
One out of three people in Japan will be an older person before 2040. Half of those currently do not utilize the internet, smartphone apps, or digital technology. On the other hand, more than 70% of seniors in Republic of Korea use the internet, and 55% in Singapore had access to it in 2019. The use of digital technology for health promotion has the potential to promote individual and community empowerment, advocating for healthy, active aging. Maintaining equity in health promotion practice requires the digital inclusion of every senior. Therefore, we propose a cross-cultural study to explain the contextual influences of digital inclusion and its consequences on healthy aging in Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Thailand. Quantitatively: digital skills, e-health literacy, participation in health promotion, and quality of life will be analyzed in structural equation models. Qualitatively: thematic analysis will be developed to identify cultural patterns and contextual factors, making sense of what older persons in different countries materialize, say, do, think, and feel to reveal deeper beliefs and core values about digital inclusion and healthy aging. Logics and methods from this protocol would be useful to replicate the study in many countries globally. Evidence from this study is expected to pave the way to digitally inclusive, healthy aging communities (DIHAC) across Japan and Asia.Entities:
Keywords: Asia; cross-cultural; digital inclusion; empowerment; gray digital divide; healthy aging; mixed method
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35742230 PMCID: PMC9223148 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19126976
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
What we will elucidate in four study sites and the expected yearly outcome in five-year timeline.
| Timeline | Japan | Korea | Singapore | Thailand |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Coordination meeting in Zoom | Coordination meeting in Zoom | Coordination meeting in Zoom | Coordination meeting in Zoom |
| Policy review | Policy review | Policy review | Policy review | |
| Preparation of instrument, validation, and translation | Preparation of instrument, validation, and translation | Preparation of instrument, validation, and translation | Preparation of instrument, validation, and translation | |
| Ethical approval | Ethical approval | Ethical approval | Ethical approval | |
| Coordination visit | Coordination visit | Coordination visit | Coordination visit | |
| Output | A detailed plan and ethical approval in hand and launching the DIHAC website | |||
|
| Filed survey: Quantitative Data collection | Filed survey: Quantitative Data collection | Filed survey: Quantitative Data collection | Filed survey: Quantitative Data collection |
| Statistical analysis | Statistical analysis | Statistical analysis | Statistical analysis | |
| Output | Preliminary data analysis results presented in Japan or international conference | |||
|
| Interview visit | Interview visit | Interview visit | Interview visit |
| Qualitative data collection | Qualitative data collection | Qualitative data collection | Qualitative data collection | |
| Thematic analysis | Thematic analysis | Thematic analysis | Thematic analysis | |
| Data integration | Data integration | Data integration | Data integration | |
| Output | Presenting qualitative results in Japan or international conference | |||
|
| Model synthesis: Cross-cultural critical reflection via meeting/workshop/Zoom meeting | |||
| Japan model | Korea model | Singapore model | Thai model | |
| Outcome |
| |||
| Output | Presenting at an international symposium | |||
|
| Dissemination of DIHAC study findings | |||
| Preparing initial publication to submit to peer-review international scientific journals | ||||
| Outcomes | Preparing a report, final manuscripts and a book, videos of case studies, visual media | |||
| Outcomes | Advocacy: informing results to the local authority, reporting models, and empowerment strategy | |||
| Outcomes | Publish manuscript | Publish manuscript | Publish manuscript | Publish manuscript |
|
| ||||
Note: (QUAN → qual)—quantitative findings and qualitative findings are integrated to explain the results; DIHAC—digitally inclusive, healthy aging communities.