Literature DB >> 11508475

Health-related quality of life research and the capability approach of Amartya Sen.

M A Verkerk1, J J Busschbach, E D Karssing.   

Abstract

Standardised health-related quality of life questionnaires play an increasing role as measures of outcome in the evaluation of health care interventions. However, problems can arise when the selected functions or dimensions of such standardised measures are not in line with the intervention that is the focus of the research. Furthermore, the subjective element of quality of life makes standardised questionnaires vulnerable to the coping mechanism, thereby decreasing their sensitivity. The capability approach of the economist and philosopher Amartya Sen offers a descriptive concept that contributes to a better understanding of these problems. This article provides an introduction to the ideas of Sen for researchers who wish to go beyond the traditional framework of measuring health-related quality of life.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508475     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016652515418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  9 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of outcomes of health intervention.

Authors:  C D Jenkins
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  A holistic approach to the economic evaluation of health programs using institutionalist methodology.

Authors:  S Jan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2.

Authors:  G W Torrance; D H Feeny; W J Furlong; R D Barr; Y Zhang; Q Wang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Constructing health state preference values from descriptive quality of life outcomes: mission impossible?

Authors:  J V Chancellor; D Coyle; M F Drummond
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Measuring quality of life in patients with depression or anxiety.

Authors:  D Whalley; S P McKenna
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  The use of condition specific outcome measures in economic appraisal.

Authors:  J Brazier; S Dixon
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Response-shift bias: a challenge to the assessment of patients' quality of life in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  M A Sprangers
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.111

8.  Cost utility analysis of sildenafil compared with papaverine-phentolamine injections.

Authors:  E A Stolk; J J Busschbach; M Caffa; E J Meuleman; F F Rutten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

9.  [Perceived quality of life of elderly somatic nursing-home patients. Construction of a measuring instrument].

Authors:  C van Campen; A Kerkstra
Journal:  Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  1998-02
  9 in total
  16 in total

1.  Conceptualising health: insights from the capability approach.

Authors:  Iain Law; Heather Widdows
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-10-06

2.  Quality of Life and Value Assessment in Health Care.

Authors:  Alicia Hall
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2020-03

3.  Personalised Medicine and Scarce Resources: A Discussion of Ethical Chances and Challenges from the Perspective of the Capability Approach.

Authors:  Caroline Brall; Peter Schröder-Bäck
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  The relative contribution of domains of quality of life to overall quality of life for different chronic diseases.

Authors:  R Arnold; A V Ranchor; R Sanderman; G I J M Kempen; J Ormel; T P B M Suurmeijer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A.

Authors:  Hareth Al-Janabi; Terry N Flynn; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  From evidence based bioethics to evidence based social policies.

Authors:  Luc Bonneux
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Test-retest reliability of capability measurement in the UK general population.

Authors:  Hareth Al-Janabi; Terry N Flynn; Tim J Peters; Stirling Bryan; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  An investigation of the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability measure.

Authors:  Hareth Al-Janabi; Tim J Peters; John Brazier; Stirling Bryan; Terry N Flynn; Sam Clemens; Alison Moody; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Measuring quality of life in mental health: are we asking the right questions?

Authors:  Janice Connell; Alicia O'Cathain; John Brazier
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tim G A Calon; Marc van Hoof; Herbert van den Berge; Arthur J G de Bruijn; Joost van Tongeren; Janny R Hof; Jan Wouter Brunings; Sofia Jonhede; Lucien J C Anteunis; Miranda Janssen; Manuela A Joore; Marcus Holmberg; Martin L Johansson; Robert J Stokroos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.