| Literature DB >> 35741826 |
Xiangzhan Zhang1,2,3, Bo Li1,2,3, Ruiwei Duan1,2,3, Chunhong Han1,2,3,4, Lei Wang1,2,3, Jian Yang1,2,3, Long Wang1,2,3, Suke Wang1,2,3, Yanli Su1,2,3, Huabai Xue1,2,3.
Abstract
Pear (Pyrus L.) is one of the most important temperate fruit crops worldwide, with considerable economic value and significant health benefits. Red-skinned pears have an attractive appearance and relatively high anthocyanin accumulation, and are especially favored by customers. Abnormal weather conditions usually reduce the coloration of red pears. The application of exogenous sucrose obviously promotes anthocyanins accumulation in 'Kuerle Xiangli' (Pyrus sinkiangensis Yü); however, the underlying molecular mechanism of sucrose-mediated fruit coloration remains largely unknown. In this study, comprehensive transcriptome analysis was performed to identify the essential regulators and pathways associated with anthocyanin accumulation. The differentially expressed genes enriched in Gene Ontology and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes items were analyzed. The transcript levels of some anthocyanin biosynthetic regulatory genes and structural genes were significantly induced by sucrose treatment. Sucrose application also stimulated the expression of some sugar transporter genes. Further RT-qPCR analysis confirmed the induction of anthocyanin biosynthetic genes. Taken together, the results revealed that sucrose promotes pear coloration most likely by regulating sugar metabolism and anthocyanin biosynthesis, and this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms underlying the coloration of red-skinned pear.Entities:
Keywords: anthocyanin accumulation; coloration; pear; sucrose
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741826 PMCID: PMC9222499 DOI: 10.3390/genes13061064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4425 Impact factor: 4.141
Figure 1Application of exogenous sucrose promoted anthocyanin accumulation in ‘Kuerle Xiangli’. (A) Phenotypes of ‘Kuerle Xiangli’ under sucrose treatment at different time points. Measurement of the (B) anthocyanins and (C) phenol content in ‘Kuerle Xiangli’ under sucrose treatment. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (*, p < 0.05; and **, p < 0.01) calculated by Student’s t-test.
Overview of the transcriptome data and quality control of pear peel subjected to sucrose treatment at different time points.
| Sample | Raw Data | Clean Data (%) | Q20 (%) | Q30 (%) | GC (%) | Total Mapped (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUC-0 h-1 | 82,667,734 | 82,450,850 (99.74%) | 98.14% | 94.09% | 45.72% | 71,106,922 (86.29%) |
| SUC-0 h-2 | 47,461,574 | 47,337,338 (99.74%) | 98.00% | 93.70% | 45.57% | 40,788,425 (86.21%) |
| SUC-0 h-3 | 59,384,286 | 59,245,816 (99.77%) | 98.19% | 94.17% | 45.73% | 51,538,794 (87.05%) |
| SUC-3 h-1 | 50,820,492 | 50,699,094 (99.76%) | 98.22% | 94.29% | 45.76% | 44,155,124 (87.15%) |
| SUC-3 h-2 | 59,876,342 | 59,730,970 (99.76%) | 98.21% | 94.21% | 45.77% | 51,955,390 (87.05%) |
| SUC-3 h-3 | 49,816,612 | 49,697,046 (99.76%) | 98.27% | 94.41% | 45.82% | 42,609,191 (85.85%) |
| SUC-24 h-1 | 53,803,782 | 53,669,030 (99.75%) | 98.10% | 94.07% | 46.13% | 46,304,024 (86.34%) |
| SUC-24 h-2 | 66,094,172 | 65,934,960 (99.76%) | 98.14% | 94.12% | 46.15% | 56,921,111 (86.44%) |
| SUC-24 h-3 | 51,003,520 | 50,893,952 (99.79%) | 98.16% | 94.15% | 46.18% | 44,200,763 (86.97%) |
| SUC-72 h-1 | 50,473,534 | 50,349,396 (99.75%) | 98.14% | 94.17% | 46.52% | 43,343,719 (86.31%) |
| SUC-72 h-2 | 57,464,526 | 57,323,698 (99.75%) | 98.18% | 94.27% | 46.20% | 49,017,640 (85.89%) |
| SUC-72 h-3 | 61,896,448 | 61,749,868 (99.76%) | 98.11% | 94.11% | 46.21% | 53,437,535 (86.70%) |
Figure 2Correlation analysis of samples under sucrose treatment at different time points. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of samples subjected to sucrose treatment at different time points. (B) Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis of the 12 samples under sucrose treatment at indicated time points. The red scale indicates a high correlation, and the blue scale indicates a low correlation.
Figure 3Analysis of DEGs in different groups. (A) Volcano plot of DEGs in response to sucrose treatment for 0 h vs. 3 h. (B) Volcano plot of DEGs in response to sucrose treatment for 0 h vs. 24 h. (C) Volcano plot of DEGs in response to sucrose treatment for 0 h vs. 72 h. (D) Venn diagram of the DEGs in different groups under sucrose treatment. Red dots indicate upregulated genes, and blue dots indicate downregulated genes. Gray dots indicate no significant differentially expressed genes. Ns, no significant difference. The numbers of upregulated and downregulated DEGs are shown in the corresponding figures.
Figure 4GO enrichment analysis of DEGs in different groups. (A) GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs in response to sucrose treatment for 3 h and 0 h. (B) GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs in response to sucrose treatment for 24 h and 0 h. (C) GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs in response to sucrose treatment for 72 h and 0 h. The dots indicate the number of DEGs, and the color scale indicates the q-value.
Figure 5KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs in different groups. (A) KEGG enrichment analysis of the DEGs in response to sucrose treatment for 3 h and 0 h. (B) KEGG enrichment analysis of the DEGs in response to sucrose treatment for 24 h and 0 h. (C) KEGG enrichment analysis of the DEGs in response to sucrose treatment for 72 h and 0 h.
Figure 6Heatmap of the expression profiles of structural genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis pathways under sucrose treatment. The color scale indicates the gene expression levels. Red indicates a high expression level and green indicates a low expression level.
Figure 7The expression profiles of different transcription factor families under sucrose treatment. Heatmap of the expression levels of sugar transporter genes using the TBtools with the data normalized to log scale and row scale. Red indicates high expression level and blue indicates low expression level.
Figure 8The expression profiles of the sugar transporter genes under sucrose treatment. Heatmap of the expression levels of sugar transporter genes using TBtools with the data normalized to a log scale and row scale. Red indicates a high expression level and green indicates a low expression level.
Figure 9WGCNA of differentially expressed genes under sucrose treatment. (A) Hierarchical cluster analysis of the non-redundant DEGs involved in 16 modules. The co-expressed DEGs were exhibited at the end of the branches in the hierarchical cluster tree, and the modules were represented by designated colors. (B) Correlation analysis of the modules and the total anthocyanin and phenol content. The panel with designated colors indicates different modules. The color scale represents the correlations between different modules and corresponding traits. The upper data in each box indicate the value of correlations and the data below indicate the p-value. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01, ***, p < 0.001). (C) Cytoscape analysis of the co-expressed DEGs in the module of “MM. skyblue”. The dots with red and green colors indicate the regulatory genes and structural genes, respectively. The red and blue lines indicate higher and lower weight value, respectively.
Figure 10RT-qPCR analysis of anthocyanin biosynthesis-related structural and regulatory genes under sucrose treatment. Error bars indicate the mean ± SD of three independent replicates.