| Literature DB >> 35741089 |
Rebekka Hartan1,2, Sören Schnellhardt1,2, Maike Büttner-Herold2,3, Christoph Daniel2,3, Arndt Hartmann2,4, Rainer Fietkau1,2, Luitpold Distel1,2.
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating CD45RO+ memory T cells have unanimously been described as a positive prognostic factor in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Here, we investigated the long-term prognostic relevance of CD45RO+ memory T cells in HNSCC with special regard to the influence of clinical characteristics. Pre-treatment biopsy samples from 306 patients with predominantly advanced HNSCC were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry was used to stain tissue microarrays for CD45RO+ memory T cells. CD45RO cell densities were semi-automatically registered and used for survival analysis. High CD45RO+ cell densities were clearly associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival as well as no evidence of disease status after 10 years (p < 0.05). In contrast, the prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating memory T cells was completely reversed in high-risk groups: in poorly differentiated tumors (G3, G4) and in cases with lymph node involvement (N+), high memory T cell densities correlated with reduced 10-year OS (p < 0.05). In conclusion, an increased density of tumor-infiltrating CD45RO+ cells in HNSCC can be a positive as well as a negative prognostic factor, depending on disease stage and histological grade. Therefore, if CD45RO+ cell density is to be used as a prognostic biomarker, further clinical characteristics must be considered.Entities:
Keywords: CD45RO; head and neck cancer; memory T cells; prognostic value; reversal of prognostic value
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35741089 PMCID: PMC9221945 DOI: 10.3390/cells11121960
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
Clinical characteristics of the studied patient cohort.
| Clinical Characteristics | (Number of Patients) Percentage |
|---|---|
| Sex | male (258) 84% |
| female (48) 16% | |
| Median age (years) | 55 (SD: 9.16, min: 27, max: 81) |
| Location/primary site of the tumor | throat, oro-, naso-, hypopharynx, base of tongue (237) 77% |
| floor of mouth (8) 3% | |
| palate (61) 20% | |
| UICC Stage | I (13) 4% |
| II (28) 9% | |
| III (56) 18% | |
| IV (209) 68% | |
| Primary tumor | T1 (58) 19% |
| T2 (102) 33% | |
| T3 (74) 24% | |
| T4 (72) 24% | |
| Pathological regional lymph nodes | N0 (108) 35% |
| N1 (38) 12% | |
| N2 (134) 44% | |
| N3 (26) 8% | |
| Distant metastasis | M0 (301) 98% |
| M1 (5) 2% | |
| Grading | G1 (16) 5% |
| G2 (178) 58% | |
| G3 (104) 34% | |
| G4 (8) 3% | |
| Treatment | 0 def. RCT (52) 17% |
| 1 OP + adj. RCT (222) 73% | |
| 2 Neoadj. RCT + OP (32) 10% |
SD = standard deviation, min = minimum age, max = maximum age, UICC = Union for International Cancer Control, def. = definitive, RCT = radiochemotherapy, OP = operation, adj. = adjuvant, neoadj. = neoadjuvant.
Figure 1(A) Kaplan–Meier plots of 10-year survival of the analyzed cohort divided into overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and no evidence of disease. (B) Representative image of a tissue spot from a tissue microarray (TMA) with distinct stromal CD45RO+ cell infiltration. The bottom right window depicts examples of CD45RO+ cells stained by immunohistochemistry. (C) Representative image of a tissue spot with weak stromal infiltration. Intraepithelial compartment highlighted by image analysis software. (D) Boxplots of stromal and intraepithelial CD45RO+ cell densities in head and neck tumors. The black horizontal line between the two boxplots indicates significant differences between mean values. (E,F) Kaplan–Meier plots of overall survival according to CD45RO+ cell densities in the (E) stromal and (F) intraepithelial compartment. (G,H) Boxplots of CD45RO+ cell density in prognostic groups of Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival in the (G) stromal compartment and (H) intraepithelial compartment. Student’s t-test was used to compare groups.
Figure 2(A,B) Kaplan–Meier plots of recurrence-free survival according to CD45RO+ cell densities in the (A) stromal and (B) intraepithelial compartment. (C,D) Kaplan–Meier plots of no evidence of disease status according to CD45RO+ cell densities in the (C) stromal and (D) intraepithelial compartment.
Figure 3(A,B) Kaplan–Meier plots of 10-year overall survival according to (A) histologic grading and (B) lymph node status. (C) Boxplots of CD45RO+ cell densities in the intraepithelial compartment according to histologic grading. (D) Boxplots of CD45RO+ cell densities in the stromal compartment according to lymph node status. Student’s t-test was used to compare groups.
Figure 4(A,B) Kaplan–Meier plots of 10-year overall survival according to intraepithelial CD45RO+ cell densities in (A) low-grade (G1, G2) versus (B) high-grade (G3, G4) tumors. (C,D) Kaplan–Meier plots of 10-year overall survival according to stromal CD45RO+ cell densities in patients with (C) no lymph node involvement (N0) versus patients with (D) positive lymph node status (N1-3). To allow a direct comparison, faded versions of the respective survival curves from (A,C) were included in (B,D). (E) Boxplots of intraepithelial CD45RO+ cell densities in the prognostic groups defined in (A,B). (F) Boxplots of stromal CD45RO+ cell densities in the prognostic groups defined in (C,D). Student’s t-test was used to compare groups.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival according to the Cox proportional hazards model.
| Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Hazard Ratio | 95% C.I. |
| Hazard Ratio | 95% C.I. |
|
| Age (year) (<55 (n = 150) vs. ≥55 (n = 148)) | 1.083 | 0.802–1.461 | 0.60 | --- | --- | --- |
| Sex (Male (n = 252) vs. Female (n = 46)) | 0.884 | 0.574–1.361 | 0.58 | --- | --- | --- |
| T Stage (T1, T2 (n = 155) vs. T3, T4 (n = 143)) | 1.244 | 0.922–1.68 | 0.15 | 1.144 | 0.816–1.605 | 0.43 |
| N Stage (N0 (n = 106) vs. N1, N2, N3 (n = 192)) | 1.052 | 0.767–1.443 | 0.75 | --- | --- | --- |
| Histological grading (G1, G2 (n = 188) vs. G3, G4 (n = 110)) | 0.943 | 0.69–1.288 | 0.71 | --- | --- | --- |
| Surgery (No (n = 52) vs. Yes (n = 246)) | 0.765 | 0.523–1.119 | 0.17 | 0.756 | 0.517–1.107 | 0.15 |
| Stromal CD45RO+ cell density (low (n = 193) vs. high (n = 105 )) | 0.706 | 0.512–0.974 |
| 0.698 | 0.504–0.965 |
|
| Intraepithelial CD45RO+ cell density (low (n = 113) vs. high (n = 185)) | 0.768 | 0.564–1.045 | 0.09 | 0.823 | 0.6–1.129 | 0.23 |
Distribution of clinical characteristics and CD45RO+ cell density according to treatment modality.
| Treatment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (Total) | Definitive RCT | Adjuvant RCT | Neoadjuvant RCT |
| |
|
| 0.2 | ||||
| <55 | 155 | 22 (42%) | 113 (51%) | 20 (63%) | |
| ≥55 | 151 | 30 (58%) | 109 (49%) | 12 (37%) | |
|
| 0.68 | ||||
| male | 258 | 42 (81%) | 188 (85%) | 28 (88%) | |
| female | 48 | 10 (19%) | 34 (15%) | 4 (12%) | |
|
|
| ||||
| T1,2 | 160 | 3 (6%) | 145 (65%) | 12 (38%) | |
| T3,4 | 146 | 49 (94%) | 77 (35%) | 32 (62%) | |
|
|
| ||||
| N0 | 108 | 8 (15%) | 98 (44%) | 2 (7%) | |
| N1,2,3 | 197 | 44 (85%) | 124 (56%) | 29 (93%) | |
|
|
| ||||
| I, II, III | 97 | 6 (12%) | 85 (38%) | 6 (19%) | |
| IV | 209 | 46 (89%) | 137 (62%) | 26 (81%) | |
|
| 0.17 | ||||
| G1,2 | 194 | 36 (69%) | 134 (60%) | 24 (75%) | |
| G3,4 | 112 | 16 (31%) | 88 (40%) | 8 (25%) | |
|
| 0.94 | ||||
| low | 199 | 35 (67%) | 144 (65%) | 20 (65%) | |
| high | 106 | 17 (33%) | 78 (35%) | 11 (35%) | |
| n.a. | 1 | ||||
|
|
| ||||
| low | 114 | 17 (33%) | 94 (42%) | 3 (10%) | |
| high | 189 | 35 (67%) | 128 (58%) | 26 (90%) | |
| n.a. | 3 | ||||
RCT = radiochemotherapy, UICC = Union for International Cancer Control, n.a. = not available.
Figure 5(A) Kaplan–Meier plot of overall survival according to treatment modality. (B–D) Kaplan–Meier plots of overall survival according to intraepithelial CD45RO+ cell densities in patients treated with (B) definitive radiochemotherapy (RCT), (C) adjuvant RCT, and (D) neoadjuvant RCT.