| Literature DB >> 18941457 |
H E Lee1, S W Chae, Y J Lee, M A Kim, H S Lee, B L Lee, W H Kim.
Abstract
The study aims to determine whether type and density of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) can predict the clinical course in gastric cancer. Gastric carcinomas (n=220) were immunostained for CD3, CD8, CD20, and CD45RO and evaluated for clinicopathologic characteristics. Number of TILs that immunostained positively for each marker were counted using NIH ImageJ software. Tumours were grouped into low- and high-density groups for each marker (CD3, CD8, CD45RO). The densities of CD3(+), CD8(+), and CD45RO(+) TILs were found to be independent predictors of lymph node metastasis by multivariate analysis with odds ratios (95% CI) of 0.425 (0.204-0.885), 0.325 (0.150-0.707), and 0.402 (0.190-0.850), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that patients in the high-density groups for CD3, CD8, and C45RO had a significantly longer survival time than the patients in the corresponding low-density groups, respectively. In multivariate survival analysis, the densities of CD3(+), CD8(+), and CD45RO(+) TILs remained independent prognostic factors with hazard ratios (95% CI) of 0.549 (0.317-0.951), 0.574 (0.347-0.949), and 0.507 (0.298-0.862), respectively. In conclusion, density of TILs was found to be independently predictive of regional lymph node metastasis and patient survival in gastric cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18941457 PMCID: PMC2584941 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604738
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Types of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. CD3 (A), CD8 (B), CD45RO (C), and CD20 (D) expressing cells were detected immunohistochemically. They are tumour-infiltrating total T cells, cytotoxic T cells, memory T cells, and B cells, respectively (original magnification, × 100).
Classification of the gastric cancers according to TIL density
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| CD3L/CD3H | 142/78 | 165/55 |
| CD8L/CD8H | 164/56 | 164/56 |
| CD45ROL/CD45ROH | 155/65 | 165/55 |
|
| ||
| CD3LCD8 L/CD3CD8Het/CD3HCD8H | 135/36/49 | 150/29/41 |
| CD3LCD45ROL/CD3CD45ROHet/CD3HCD45ROH | 131/35/54 | 148/34/38 |
| CD8LCD45ROL/CD8CD45ROHet/CD8HCD45ROH | 140/39/41 | 146/37/37 |
| CD3LCD8LCD45ROL/ CD3CD8CD45ROHet/CD3HCD8HCD45ROH | 125/55/40 | 138/50/32 |
H=high density group; Het=mixture of low and high density group for different markers; L=low density group.
Correlation between TIL density and clinicopathologic characteristics in the 220 gastric cancers
|
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.026 | 0.250 | 0.167 | ||||||
| <66 | 108 | 69 | 129 | 48 | 121 | 56 | |||
| ⩾66 | 34 | 9 | 35 | 8 | 34 | 9 | |||
|
| 0.023 | 0.109 | 0.315 | ||||||
| Male | 108 | 48 | 121 | 35 | 113 | 43 | |||
| Female | 34 | 30 | 43 | 21 | 42 | 22 | |||
|
| 0.148 | 0.008 | 0.118 | ||||||
| WD | 9 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 3 | |||
| MD | 50 | 23 | 58 | 15 | 53 | 20 | |||
| PD | 58 | 44 | 65 | 37 | 65 | 37 | |||
| Mucinous | 9 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 10 | 0 | |||
| SRC | 16 | 7 | 21 | 2 | 18 | 5 | |||
|
| 0.143 | 0.590 | 0.446 | ||||||
| Absent | 88 | 56 | 109 | 35 | 99 | 45 | |||
| Present | 54 | 22 | 55 | 21 | 56 | 20 | |||
|
| 0.095 | 0.924 | 0.366 | ||||||
| T1/2 | 98 | 62 | 119 | 41 | 110 | 50 | |||
| T3/4 | 44 | 16 | 45 | 15 | 45 | 15 | |||
|
| <0.001 | 0.012 | <0.001 | ||||||
| Absent | 24 | 31 | 34 | 21 | 28 | 27 | |||
| Present | 118 | 47 | 130 | 35 | 127 | 38 | |||
|
| 0.001 | 0.250 | 0.018 | ||||||
| I | 32 | 35 | 44 | 23 | 38 | 29 | |||
| II | 32 | 21 | 41 | 12 | 38 | 15 | |||
| III | 44 | 11 | 44 | 11 | 45 | 10 | |||
| IV | 34 | 11 | 35 | 10 | 34 | 11 | |||
LN=lymph node; MD=moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma; Mucinous=mucinous adenocarcinoma; PD=poorly differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma; SRC=signet-ring cell carcinoma; WD=well differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma.
The results were according to the density groups of TIL with mean value cutoffs.
*χ2 test was used as a statistical method.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for predictors of regional lymph node metastasis (results from mean value cutoffs)
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CD3 | 0.308 | 0.164–0.580 | <0.001 | 0.350 | 0.175–0.701 | 0.003 |
| CD8 | 0.436 | 0.225–0.843 | 0.014 | 0.325 | 0.150–0.707 | 0.005 |
| CD45RO | 0.310 | 0.163–0.589 | <0.001 | 0.302 | 0.147–0.622 | 0.001 |
| CD3CD8 | 0.307 | 0.148–0.640 | 0.002 | 0.277 | 0.122–0.632 | 0.002 |
| CD3CD45RO | 0.234 | 0.116–0.473 | <0.001 | 0.236 | 0.107–0.523 | <0.001 |
| CD8CD45RO | 0.292 | 0.136–0.625 | 0.002 | 0.260 | 0.111–0.608 | 0.002 |
| CD3CD8CD45RO | 0.258 | 0.117–0.567 | 0.001 | 0.257 | 0.108–0.614 | 0.028 |
CI=confidence interval; OR=odds ratio.
The results were according to the density groups of TIL with mean value cutoffs.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used as statistical methods.
Tumour invasion (T stage) and presence of lymphatic invasion were adopted as covariates in each multivariate analysis.
high vs low.
high/high vs low/low.
high/high/high vs low/low/low.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for predictors of regional lymph node metastasis (results from 75th percentile cutoffs)
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CD3 | 0.375 | 0.194–0.726 | 0.004 | 0.425 | 0.204–0.885 | 0.022 |
| CD8 | 0.436 | 0.225–0.843 | 0.014 | 0.325 | 0.150–0.707 | 0.005 |
| CD45RO | 0.420 | 0.217–0.815 | 0.010 | 0.402 | 0.190–0.850 | 0.017 |
| CD3CD8 | 0.338 | 0.161–0.710 | 0.004 | 0.318 | 0.138–0.734 | 0.007 |
| CD3CD45RO | 0.321 | 0.149–0.689 | 0.004 | 0.337 | 0.143–0.793 | 0.013 |
| CD8CD45RO | 0.400 | 0.180–0.888 | 0.024 | 0.354 | 0.146–0.860 | 0.022 |
| CD3CD8CD45RO | 0.369 | 0.160–0.851 | 0.019 | 0.397 | 0.160–0.988 | 0.047 |
CI=confidence interval; OR=odds ratio.
The results were according to the density groups of TIL with 75th percentile cutoffs.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used as statistical methods.
Tumour invasion (T stage) and presence of lymphatic invasion were adopted as covariates in each multivariate analysis.
High vs low.
High/high vs low/low.
High/high/high vs low/low/low.
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier survival plots for the 220 gastric cancer patients as a function of TIL density. (A) Significant differences in overall survival were found between the low- and high-density groups of CD3, CD8, and CD45RO, by the log-rank tests. (B, C) Survival differences were consistently found when analysing with diverse combined TIL variables (refer to Table 1).
Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazards models for the predictors of overall survival (results from mean value cutoffs)
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CD3 | 0.627 | 0.410–0.627 | 0.031 | 0.813 | 0.523–1.264 | 0.358 |
| CD8 | 0.583 | 0.358–0.950 | 0.030 | 0.574 | 0.347–0.949 | 0.031 |
| CD45RO | 0.530 | 0.331–0.850 | 0.008 | 0.612 | 0.377–0.995 | 0.048 |
| CD3CD8 | 0.522 | 0.303–0.900 | 0.019 | 0.572 | 0.325–1.010 | 0.054 |
| CD3CD45RO | 0.441 | 0.252–0.772 | 0.004 | 0.565 | 0.317–1.009 | 0.054 |
| CD8CD45RO | 0.416 | 0.221–0.785 | 0.007 | 0.436 | 0.227–0.838 | 0.013 |
| CD3CD8CD45RO | 0.393 | 0.202–0.766 | 0.006 | 0.471 | 0.236–0.937 | 0.032 |
CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio.
The results were according to the density groups of TIL with mean value cutoffs.
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used as statistical methods.
Tumour stage (T stage), histologic classification (WHO), presence of lymph node metastasis, and presence of lymphatic invasion which were proved to have a prognostic significance in univariate analysis were adopted as covariates in each multivariate analysis.
High vs low.
High/high vs low/low.
High/high/high vs low/low/low.
Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazard models for the predictors of overall survival (results from 75th percentile cutoffs)
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CD3 | 0.446 | 0.261–0.760 | 0.003 | 0.549 | 0.317–0.951 | 0.032 |
| CD8 | 0.583 | 0.358–0.950 | 0.030 | 0.574 | 0.347–0.949 | 0.031 |
| CD45RO | 0.483 | 0.287–0.813 | 0.006 | 0.507 | 0.298–0.862 | 0.012 |
| CD3CD8 | 0.373 | 0.193–0.721 | 0.003 | 0.403 | 0.205–0.795 | 0.009 |
| CD3CD45RO | 0.305 | 0.147–0.632 | 0.001 | 0.337 | 0.161–0.708 | 0.004 |
| CD8CD45RO | 0.418 | 0.216–0.809 | 0.010 | 0.413 | 0.211–0.812 | 0.010 |
| CD3CD8CD45RO | 0.271 | 0.118–0.624 | 0.002 | 0.282 | 0.121–0.658 | 0.003 |
CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio.
The results were according to the density groups of TIL with 75th percentile cutoffs.
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used as statistical methods.
Tumour stage (T stage), histologic classification (WHO), presence of lymph node metastasis, and presence of lymphatic invasion which were proved to have prognostic significance in univariate analysis were adopted as covariates in each multivariate analysis.
High vs low.
High/high vs low/low.
High/high/high vs low/low/low.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models for predictors of regional lymph node metastasis (results from two-fold cross-validation approach)
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CD3 | 0.42 | 0.211–0.818 | 0.011 | 0.45 | 0.213–0.935 | 0.033 |
| CD8 | 0.32 | 0.158–0.630 | 0.001 | 0.34 | 0.162–0.723 | 0.005 |
| CD45RO | 0.29 | 0.153–0.554 | <0.001 | 0.27 | 0.128–0.554 | <0.001 |
| CD3CD8 | 0.28 | 0.124–0.614 | 0.001 | 0.31 | 0.128–0.729 | 0.003 |
| CD3CD45RO | 0.26 | 0.123–0.527 | <0.001 | 0.25 | 0.108–0.563 | <0.001 |
| CD8CD45RO | 0.21 | 0.097–0.459 | 0.001 | 0.20 | 0.085–0.479 | 0.001 |
| CD3CD8CD45RO | 0.20 | 0.083–0.463 | <0.001 | 0.20 | 0.077–0.518 | <0.001 |
CI=confidence interval; OR=odds ratio.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used as statistical methods.
Tumour invasion (T stage) and presence of lymphatic invasion were adopted as covariates in each multivariate analysis.
high vs low.
high/high vs low/low.
high/high/high vs low/low/low.
Univariate and multivariate cox proportional hazards models for the predictors of overall survival (results from two-fold cross-validation approach)
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CD3 | 0.57 | 0.343–0.935 | 0.026 | 0.67 | 0.404–1.123 | 0.130 |
| CD8 | 0.59 | 0.374–0.938 | 0.026 | 0.64 | 0.408–1.003 | 0.052 |
| CD45RO | 0.30 | 0.151–0.594 | 0.001 | 0.42 | 0.209–0.843 | 0.015 |
| CD3CD8 | 0.49 | 0.288–0.837 | 0.009 | 0.56 | 0.324–0.964 | 0.037 |
| CD3CD45RO | 0.34 | 0.162–0.691 | 0.003 | 0.44 | 0.211–0.923 | 0.030 |
| CD8CD45RO | 0.28 | 0.134–0.592 | 0.001 | 0.36 | 0.170–0.768 | 0.008 |
| CD3CD8CD45RO | 0.31 | 0.148–0.656 | 0.002 | 0.39 | 0.185–0.836 | 0.015 |
CI=confidence interval; HR=hazard ratio.
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used as statistical methods.
Tumour stage (T stage), histologic classification (WHO), presence of lymph node metastasis, and presence of lymphatic invasion which were proved to have prognostic significance in univariate analysis were adopted as covariates in each multivariate analysis.
high vs low.
high/high vs low/low.
high/high/high vs low/low/low.
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of TIL densities at different stages of the TNM classification (log-rank tests). High TIL density tended to be associated with longer overall survival within a given TNM stage. The results were from 75th percentile cutoffs.