| Literature DB >> 35740795 |
Masaya Yamoto1, Kouji Nagata2, Keita Terui3, Masahiro Hayakawa4, Hiroomi Okuyama5, Shoichiro Amari6, Akiko Yokoi7, Kouji Masumoto8, Tadaharu Okazaki9, Noboru Inamura10, Katsuaki Toyoshima11, Yuhki Koike12, Yuta Yazaki13, Taizo Furukawa14, Noriaki Usui15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment modalities for neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) have greatly improved in recent years, with a concomitant increase in survival. However, long-term outcomes restrict the identification of optimal care pathways for CDH survivors in adolescence and adulthood. Therefore, we evaluated the long-term outcomes within the Japanese CDH Study Group (JCDHSG).Entities:
Keywords: congenital diaphragmatic hernia; gastroesophageal reflux disease; intestinal obstruction; long-term outcomes; pneumonia; pneumothorax; recurrence
Year: 2022 PMID: 35740795 PMCID: PMC9222080 DOI: 10.3390/children9060856
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Children (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9067
Demographic data and characteristics (N = 626).
| Variables 1 | N or Median | (% or IQR) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 340 | (54.3) |
| Female | 286 | (45.7) |
| Gestational age (week) | 37 | (37–38) |
| Birth weight (g) | 2724 | (2426–2990) |
| Genetic variant 2 | ||
| Mild | 9 | (1.4) |
| Severe | 8 | (1.3) |
| Cardiac malformation 2 | ||
| Mild | 35 | (5.6) |
| Severe | 24 | (3.8) |
| Neurological disorder 2 | ||
| Mild | 5 | (0.8) |
| Severe | 3 | (0.5) |
| CDH laterality | ||
| Left | 579 | (92.5) |
| Right | 46 | (7.3) |
| Bilateral | 1 | (0.2) |
| Diaphragmatic defect size 3 | ||
| Defect size A and B | 401 | (64.1) |
| Defect size C and D | 101 | (30.8) |
| Unknown | 32 | (5.1) |
| Position of the liver | ||
| Intra-abdominal | 419 | (66.9) |
| Intrathoracic | 207 | (33.1) |
| Fetal Endoscopic Tracheal Occlusion | 6 | (1) |
| Delivery | ||
| Vaginal birth | 224 | (35.8) |
| Caesarean section | 402 | (64.2) |
| Age at repair (days) | 2 | (2–3) |
| Surgical approach | ||
| Abdominal | 554 | (88.4) |
| Thoracic | 6 | (1) |
| Laparoscopy | 3 | (0.5) |
| Thoracoscopy | 63 | (10.1) |
| Repair method | ||
| Primary closure | 401 | (64.2) |
| Patch closure | 217 | (34.7) |
| Muscular tissue | 2 | (0.3) |
| Unknown | 5 | (0.8) |
| History of ECMO 4 | 29 | (4.6) |
| History of NO 5 | 420 | (67.1) |
1 Reported as the median (IQR; interquartile range) or n (%). 2 Severe was defined as affecting life prognosis, systemic status, and respiratory and circulatory dynamics, while mild was defined as strongly non-affecting life prognosis. 3 Based on the CDH Study Group Staging System, diaphragm defects were classified as defect size A, B, C, or D: Defect A, diaphragm defect involves <10% of the circumference of the chest wall; defect B, diaphragm defect involves <50% of the chest wall; defect C, diaphragm defect involves >50% of the chest wall; defect D, diaphragm defect involves >90% of the chest wall. 4 ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. 5 NO = nitric oxide.
Figure 1The proportions of long-term complications.
Figure 2The proportions of different surgical procedures.
Figure 3The proportions of home medical care and type.