Literature DB >> 32130491

When primary repair is not enough: a comparison of synthetic patch and muscle flap closure in congenital diaphragmatic hernia?

Emrah Aydın1, Heather Nolan2, Jose Luis Peiró2, Patricia Burns2, Beth Rymeski2, Foong-Yen Lim2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Primary closure is often inadequate for large congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and necessitates repair by prosthetic patch or autologous muscle flap. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes of open patch versus flap repair, specifically diaphragmatic reherniation.
METHODS: A retrospective review (IRB #2017-6361) was performed on all CDH patients repaired from 2005 to 2016 at a single academic children's hospital. Patients were excluded from final analysis if they had primary or minimally invasive repair, expired, or were lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: Of 171 patients, 151 (88.3%) survived to discharge, 9 expired after discharge and 11 were lost to follow up, leaving 131 (86.8%) long-term survivors. Median follow-up was 5 years. Open repair was performed in 119 (90.8%) of which 28 (23.5%) underwent primary repair, 34 (28.6%) patch repair, and 57 (47.9%) flap repair. Overall, 6/119 (5%) patients reherniated, 1/28 (3.6%) in the primary group, 3/34 (8.8%) in the patch group, and 2/57 (3.5%) in the flap group. Comparing prosthetic patch to muscle flap repair, there was no significant difference in the number of patients who recurred nor time to reherniation (3 vs. 2, p = 0.295; 5.5 ± 0.00 months vs. 53.75 ± 71.06 months, p = 0.288). One patient in the patch group recurred twice.
CONCLUSIONS: Both muscle flap and patch repair of large CDH are feasible and durable with a relatively low risk of recurrence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CDH recurrence; CDH reherniation; Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; Muscle flap; Outcomes; Prosthetic patch

Year:  2020        PMID: 32130491     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-020-04634-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  5 in total

1.  Long-Term Outcomes of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Report of a Multicenter Study in Japan.

Authors:  Masaya Yamoto; Kouji Nagata; Keita Terui; Masahiro Hayakawa; Hiroomi Okuyama; Shoichiro Amari; Akiko Yokoi; Kouji Masumoto; Tadaharu Okazaki; Noboru Inamura; Katsuaki Toyoshima; Yuhki Koike; Yuta Yazaki; Taizo Furukawa; Noriaki Usui
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

Review 2.  Genetically Modified Mouse Models of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Opportunities and Limitations for Studying Altered Lung Development.

Authors:  Florian Friedmacher; Udo Rolle; Prem Puri
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.569

3.  The Survivorship Bias in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

Authors:  Emrah Aydin; Nilhan Torlak; Beth Haberman; Foong-Yen Lim; Jose L Peiro
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-06

4.  Transuterine Fetal Tracheal Occlusion Model in Mice.

Authors:  Emrah Aydın; Rashika Joshi; Marc Oria; Foong-Yen Lim; Brian Michael Varisco; Jose Luis Peiro
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical morbidity of primary versus patch repaired congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients.

Authors:  Kim Heiwegen; Ivo de Blaauw; Sanne M B I Botden
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.