Exploiting Unreduced Gametes for Improving Ornamental Plants.

The formation of gametes with somatic chromosome number or unreduced gametes (2n gametes) is an important process involved in the origin of polyploid plants in nature. Unreduced gametes are the result of meiotic mutations occurring during micro- and mega-sporogenesis. 2n gametes have been identified or artificially induced in a large number of plant species. Breeding of plants through 2n gametes can be advantageous because it combines genetic effects of polyploidy with meiotic recombination and sexual hybridization to produce tremendous genetic variation and heterosis. 2n gametes also occur in ornamental plants, but the potential of using 2n gametes in ornamental plant breeding has not been extensively exploited. Ornamental plants are primarily produced for their esthetic appearance and novelty, not for food and yield, and they can be readily propagated through vegetative means. Triploids, tetraploids, and plants with even higher ploidy levels produced through 2n gametes can be propagated through tissue culture to fix their phenotypes, thus leading to the development of new cultivars. In this review article, we intend to discuss the mechanisms underlying the formation of 2n gametes, techniques for 2n gamete identification, methods for enhancing 2n gamete formation, and the current status in the use of 2n gametes for development of novel ornamental plants. We believe that polyploidy breeding through 2n gametes represents a viable way of developing new cultivars, new species, and even new genera of ornamental plants.

Introduction

Unreduced gametes are referred to as male or female gametes that have somatic chromosome numbers, thus they are also known as 2n gametes. This phenomenon as an important evolutionary force, however, was not recognized until the early last century. Prior to the 1920s, it was widely accepted that polyploidy in plants resulted from hybridization followed by chromosome doubling (Winge, 1917); Karpechenko (1927) was probably among the first to notice the occurrence of unreduced gametes. He believed that tetraploid Oenothera, Primula, Solanum, and Datura were not from the result of hybridization followed by chromosome doubling. In his study of hybridization between Raphanus and Brassica, Karpechenko (1927) found that hexaploid plants were not derived from doubling of triploid zygotes but caused by unreduced gametes from meiotic failure. The formation of unreduced gametes was further explained by Buxton and Darlington (1931) on amphiploid Digitalis, and they stated that the omission of reduction during the meiosis was the cause of somatic chromosome numbers. Subsequently, unreduced gametes were documented in an increasing number of plant species. Harlan and DeWet (1975) reported that unreduced gametes occurred in 85 plant genera. Recent studies showed that 2n gametes occur in a wide range of plants.

Unreduced gametes occur not only in plants but also in green algae, insects, chickens, mammals, birds, fish, and amphibians and have been considered a primary mechanism for polyploid formation (Mason and Pires, 2015). In plants, polyploids are not blind alleys or evolutionary dead-ends as claimed by Mayrose et al. (2011). Unreduced gametes facilitate polyploid formation and interploidy gene flow in mixed ploidy populations, resulting in increased genetic variation, fitness, heterozygosity, and breeding success. Additionally, 2n gamete formation is an essential component of apomixis Ravi et al., 2008 and an important way for the restoration of F1 hybrid fertility (De Storme and Geelen, 2013). Furthermore, 2n gamete formation generates novel genetic and genomic variation including synthesizing polyploid species, promoting plants to explore new environmental niches, and outcompeting their diploid progenitors.

This article is intended to review the occurrence of 2n gamete in ornamental plants, mechanisms underlying 2n gamete formation, the identification and use of 2n gametes for development of new ornamental cultivars. Ornamental plants are those grown for decoration and beautification of indoor and outdoor environments, not for food; thus, they are valued for their esthetic appearance, not for their yield. A large number of plants are produced as ornamental plants, including floriculture crops, ornamental shrubs, trees, grasses, and bamboos as well as ornamental aquatic plants (Chen, 2021). A significant number of ornamental plants are propagated vegetatively through natural means, such as bulbs, corms, runners, or artificial means like cutting, grafting, layering, or tissue culture. Evidence shows that 2n gametes have played a fundamental role in the development of polyploid cultivars, species, and even genera of ornamental plants, demonstrating the viability of sexual polyploidization in plant evolution and speciation.

Mechanisms of 2n Gamete Formation

Unreduced gametes generally arise from meiotic defects. Meiosis is a process of producing haploid cells during which diploid cells undergo DNA replication, followed by two rounds of cell divisions known as meiosis I and meiosis II (Figure 1). In meiosis I, homologous chromosomes pair with each other and undergo genetic recombination, a process allowing to exchange genetic information through crossover. The homologous chromosomes are then separated, resulting in two haploid cells having half the number of chromosomes as the parental cell, thus meiosis I is a reductional division. Meiosis II resembles mitosis where sister chromatids are separated from each other, producing four cells with reduced chromosome number, this process is known as an equational division. However, meiotic defects can occur, including the omission of the first or second meiotic division, abnormal spindle morphology in the second division, or disturbed cytokinesis (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995; Ramanna and Jacobsen, 2003). Meiosis restitution is the predominant mechanism of 2n gamete formation in plants (Brownfield and Kohler, 2011; De Storme and Geelen, 2013). There are three main mechanisms underlying the formation of 2n gametes in plants: first division restitution (FDR), second division restitution (SDR), and indeterminant meiotic restitution (IMR).

FIGURE 1

Mechanisms underlying the formation of 2n gametes based on the genotypic outcome. For simplicity, the meiotic cell is diploid and only contains two chromosomes that are fully heterozygous (blue and red chromosomes obtained from genetically different parents). WT represents normal meiosis, resulting in four haploid cells. There are two types of first division restitution (FDR): (1) In strict FDR, there was no chromosome pairing and recombination, and chromosomes directly advance to the second division, resulting in 2n gametes that are genetically identical to the parent. (2) In broad FDR, meiosis I is not lost, chromosomes pair and undergo recombination, but the orientation and position of the spindles in meiosis II are disturbed, often being parallel (a), tripolar (b), or fused (c). As a result, the diploid cell is predicted to contain non-sister chromosome (d’Erfurth et al., 2008). In second division restitution (SDR), meiosis I occurs normally with homologous chromosomes pairing and recombination, they divide reductionally followed by cytokinesis to produce a dyad. In meiosis II, however, the centromeres of the half-bivalents divide, but the chromatids do not migrate to the poles, resulting two 2n gametes. Indeterminant meiotic restitution (IMR) shows characteristics similar to FDR and SDR. During the first meiotic division, some bivalents disjoin reductionally as in SDR, while some univalents divide equationally as in FDR.

The First Division Restitution

In FDR, pairing and split-up of homologous chromosomes fail to occur or occur at a low frequency in meiosis I (Tang and Luo, 2002); but the second division proceeds normally, resulting in two sister chromatids of homologous chromosomes to move to opposite poles (Hermsen, 1984). There are two types of FDR: a strict sense and a broad sense (Sun et al., 2021). In the strict sense, there was no pairing and recombination, and chromosomes directly advance to the second division, resulting in 2n gametes that are genetically identical to the parent. Such an FDR fully maintains parental heterozygosity and epistasis. In the broad sense, meiosis I is not lost, chromosomes pair and undergo recombination, but the orientation and position of the spindles in meiosis II are disturbed (d’Erfurth et al., 2008), often being parallel (a), tripolar (b), or fused (c; Figure 1). As a result, the broad-sense FDR produces either two 2n gametes or one 2n gametes with two haploid gametes. In this case, 2n gametes partially retain the parental heterozygosity. However, the occurrence of crossover may increase genetic variation and also allow the introgression of genes of interest in breeding.

The Second Division Restitution

In contrast to FDR, the first meiotic division occurs normally in SDR. Homologous chromosomes pair with recombination, and they divide reductionally followed by cytokinesis to produce a dyad. In meiosis II, however, the centromeres of the half-bivalents divide, but the chromatids do not migrate to the poles (Figure 1). The resulting 2n gametes are homozygous from the centromere to the first crossover but maintain parental heterozygosity at the telomeric side (Ramanna and Jacobsen, 2003). As a result, 2n gametes derived from SDR have reduced heterozygosity and show a substantial loss of parental epistasis (Peloquin et al., 2008). In general, SDR is rare in hybrids because all chromosomes are not appropriately paired as bivalents, and it tends to occur only in hybrids with closely related genomes (Ramanna and Jacobsen, 2003). The presence of cytokinesis and the formation of a cell wall after the telophase I is characteristic for most of the monocot plants (Bielig et al., 2003; Boldrini et al., 2006).

Indeterminant Meiotic Restitution

The occurrence of IMR was first reported in interspecific hybrids of ornamental lily (Longiflorum × Asiatic lily; Lim et al., 2001). IMR shows characteristics similar to FDR and SDR in which both univalents and bivalents are formed at metaphase I. During the first meiotic division, some bivalents disjoin reductionally as in SDR, while some univalents divide equationally as in FDR (Figure 1), which give rise to 2n gametes with an odd number of parental chromosomes. Unreduced gametes produced in IMR only partially retain parental heterozygosity at the centromere (Zhou et al., 2008).

Origin of 2n Gametes in Relation to Ornamental Plant Breeding

The origin of 2n gametes has profound effects on breeding of ornamental plants. In general, 2n gametes derived from FDR are more advantageous than those from SDR for transferring parental heterozygosity (Barcaccia et al., 2003; Zhang et al., 2009; Dewitte et al., 2012). In potato, FDR is known to be more than twice as effective as SDR in transmitting parental heterozygosity (Barone et al., 1995; Peloquin et al., 2008). Furthermore, progenies bred by FDR 2n gametes have more vigorous growth due to the higher allelic diversity (Yao et al., 2013). FDR is the basic mechanism of 2n pollen formation in Alstroemeria (Ramanna et al., 2003), Begonia (Dewitte et al., 2010a), Lilium (Lim et al., 2001; Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2008; Zhou et al., 2008; Khan et al., 2010), and Tulipa (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2014). This is probably attributed to the chromosomal composition of FDR gametes that are more balanced and more viable than those from SDR and IMR. Additionally, 2n gametes derived from FDR or IMR with crossovers can increase genetic variation in polyploid progenies as well as the extent of introgressions Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2005. Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) analysis confirmed the presence of recombinant chromosomes in FDR derived 2n gametes in meiotic polyploids in Lilium (Khan et al., 2009a,b; Xie et al., 2010) and Tulipa (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2012, 2014).

Methods for Identification of 2n Gametes

The identification of 2n gametes is largely focused on pollen as it is more convenient to isolate than egg cells. Common methods include pollen size measurements, flow cytometric detection of pollen DNA content, analysis of the microsporogenesis, and ploidy analysis of the progeny (Loginova and Silkova, 2017; Hwang et al., 2020). The identification of 2n eggs is complicated, which is performed by cytological examination using paraffin section, along with the ploidy analysis of the progeny.

Pollen Size

The traditional approach for identifying 2n pollen is based on pollen morphology. 2n pollen is commonly known as giant pollen (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995), which is defined as a pollen with a diameter greater than 1.5 times that of the normal one. This criterion is based on the assumption that the doubling of DNA content in 2n gametes would approximately double the pollen cell volume (Mason et al., 2011). In ornamental plants of Agave (Gomez-Rodriguez et al., 2012), Begonia (Dewitte et al., 2009), Dianthus (Zhou et al., 2015), Hibiscus (van Laere et al., 2009), and Rosa (Crespel et al., 2006), the diameter of the 2n pollen is about 30% larger than that of the haploid pollen. The presence of large 2n pollen grains results in a bimodal distribution of pollen sizes instead of a normal distribution (De Storme and Geelen, 2011). Although the size distribution between the pollen grains sometimes overlaps, a threshold value of the pollen grain size is often used to select individuals that produce 2n gametes (Sugiura et al., 2000; Crespel et al., 2006). However, caution should be given when using this method to guide 2n gamete identification because giant pollen does not necessarily prove doubled DNA content. Another disadvantage of this screening technique is the broad overlap in size distribution between small and large pollen in some genera, such as grasses. In these cases, the frequency of 2n pollen based on size is difficult to determine. Thus, other methods should be used to confirm the association between giant pollen and 2n pollen, and supplementary evaluation of pollen viability is necessary for breeding purposes.

Flow Cytometry

Flow cytometry has been widely used to measure pollen nuclear DNA content in order to understand pollen development and detect the presence of 2n pollen (Bino et al., 1990; Dewitte et al., 2009; van Laere et al., 2009; Zhu et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2021). Estimating male 2n gametes with flow cytometry entails extracting nuclei from a large number of pollen grains, staining them with a DNA-selective fluorochrome, and generating fluorescence histograms with peaks corresponding to groups of nuclei with different DNA content. Flow cytometric analysis compares the DNA content of pollen nuclei to the DNA content of somatic leaf tissue. Pollen nuclei are expected to have only half of the DNA content (1C) compared to nuclei from somatic cells (2C) of the same plant. Consequently, 2n pollen have a nuclear DNA content equal to that somatic cells.

Cytological Observation

The occurrence in 2n pollen is associated with the presence of monads, dyads, or triads during microsporogenesis (Negri et al., 1995; Fernandez et al., 2010; Chung et al., 2013; Nakato and Masuyama, 2021; Xu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021) except 2n gamete formation that is the result of pre- or post-meiotic restitution. Analysis of microsporogenesis may therefore provide an alternative method to identify 2n pollen, but this method does not provide any information about pollen viability. Cytological staining is carried out with dyes, such as acetocarmine, aceto-orcein, or fuscin, resulting in the visualization of chromatins. With the advent of a new cytological methods, immunostaining, in combination with the use of propidium iodide (PI) and 4’,6’-diamidino-2-phenylindol and spindle (anti-α-tubulin antibodies), cellular components involved in the division can be more accurately determined. Recently, immunostaining using antibodies to phospho-histone H3 (Ser10), which is characterized by localization along the entire chromosome length in the first meiotic division and only in the centromeric region in the second division, has made it possible to distinguish the stages of meiotic division (Loginova and Silkova, 2016).

Analysis of Progenies

Ploidy analysis of progenies (usually using flow cytometry) can reveal the presence of 2n gametes in parent plants. This method has been used frequently in ornamental plant breeding. In breeding of Hibiscus, five F2 hexaploid plants were isolated from self-pollinated hybrids of tetraploid F1, which was developed from the cross between H. syriacus “Oiseau Bleu” (4x) and H. paramutabilis (4x). The occurrence of hexaploidy indicated that the F1 hybrids must produce unreduced eggs since no unreduced pollen could be detected in the F1 hybrids (van Laere et al., 2009); Zhou et al. (2017) identified seven tetraploid hybrid plants from 12 progenies obtained from five crossing combinations between a tetraploid Dianthus caryophyllus “Butterfly” and diploid cultivars, suggesting that 2n male gametes were involved in polyploid formation. In lily breeding, four odd-allotetraploid seedlings were obtained from an interploidy cross, Lilium LA × AAAA. This result implied that the intergenomic variation was caused by 2n eggs, which was confirmed by GISH (Xiao et al., 2021). Progeny analysis, however, is time consuming with no guarantee of information about the production frequency of 2n gametes in the parental plants (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995) due to the differences in pollen viability, germination speed, or pollen tube growth between haploid and 2n pollen.

Genomic in situ Hybridization

The use of molecular cytological techniques, such as GISH and fluorescent in situ hybridization in combination with marker analysis, such as amplified fragment length polymorphism on meiocytes or polyploid progeny provides more accurate or additional information on the mechanisms behind 2n gamete formation (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2005; Chung et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2021). Molecular cytological approaches have been successfully used in the case of allopolyploids, where the constituent genomes can be clearly discriminated (Xi et al., 2015). Through DNA in situ hybridization, genomes of allopolyploids can be more critically assigned and intergenomic translocations and recombination can be detected, which has been used in Gasteria-Aloe hybrids (Takahashi et al., 1997), Alstroemeria species (Ramanna et al., 2003), and Lilium species (Karlov et al., 1999; Lim et al., 2001; Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2005). As such, GISH can also be used to discover the mechanism of 2n gamete formation (Karlov et al., 1999).

Occurrence of 2n Gametes in Ornamental Plants

Unreduced gametes can occur naturally via the mechanisms described above and artificially through the manipulation of environmental conditions or use of specific chemicals. Thus, the natural occurrence is the formation of 2n gametes spontaneously without artificial intervention. Up to now, naturally occurring unreduced gametes have been reported in more than 40 genera across 60 species and hybrid progenies of ornamental plants (Table 1), and artificially induced 2n gamete formation has been reported in at least 10 genera of ornamental plants (Table 2).

TABLE 1

Natural occurrence of 2n gametes in ornamental plants.

Plant	Type of unreduced gametesz	Identification method	Frequency of 2n gamete occurrence (%)	References
Achillea eriophora (2x), A. tenuifolia (2x), A. oxyodonta (2x), A. talagonica (2x), A. biebersteinii (2x), A. wilhelmsii (4x), A. vermicularis (4x), A. millefolium (6x)	M	Pollen size	1.00–3.30 y	Sheidai et al., 2009
Adiantum pedatum	–	Cytological observation	–	Rabe and Haufler, 1992
Agave angustifolia var. “Cimarrón,” A. angustifolia var. “Lineño,” A. tequilana	M	Pollen size and cytological observation	1.20–3.20	Gomez-Rodriguez et al., 2012
Alstroemeria F2 hybrids progenies	M	Cytological observation and GISH	0.21–0.59	Ramanna et al., 2003
Aranda	M	Cytological observation	Over 10%	Lee and Tham, 1988
Begonia “Anna Christina,” B. dregei, B. pearcei, B. “Bubbles,” B. “Spatflacier,” B. “Orococo,” B. “Florence Rita,” B276	M	Pollen size, cytological analysis, and flow cytometry	2–100 y	Dewitte et al., 2009, 2010b
Camellia cultivar HJ (6x)	M	Pollen size, cytological analysis, flow cytometry, ploidy level of progenies	–	Zhang et al., 2021
Centaurea pseudophrygian (2x), C. jacea (4x)	M/F	Progeny analysis	–	Koutecky et al., 2011
Cyclamen F1 hybrid	M	Cytological analysis	–	Ishizaka, 1998
Cymbidium sinense, C. lancifolium, and 30 F1 hybrids of C. sinense × C. lancifolium	M	Cytological analysis	0.19, 0.22, 0–9.36	Guo et al., 2021
C. sinense “Qijianbaimo,” “Damo,” “Hezhihua,” “Xiaoxiang,” “Taipingyang,” Cymbidium hybrids “Dafeng,” “Yunv,” “45–17,” “45–32”	M	Cytological analysis and flow cytometry	0.15–4.03	Zeng et al., 2020
Cyphoniandra betace “B24,” “LA,” Variable type	–	Pollen size and cytological analysis	–	Pringle and Murray, 1992
Datura stramonium (4x)	M	Cytological observation	0.10 y	Belling and Blakeslee, 1923
Dactylis glomerata subsp. castellala, D. lusitanica, D. aschersoniana, D. parthiana, D. himalayensis, galician type, D. juncinell, D. ibizensis, D. smithii	M/F	Progeny analysis and cytological observation	0.14–14.35/0.10–25.68	Haan et al., 1992; Maceira et al., 1992
Dendranthema grandiflora (6x)	M	Flow cytometry	–	Bino et al., 1990
Dianthus caryophyllus “Promesa,” “Guernse Yellow,” “YunhongErhao,” “Red Barbara,” “L. P. Barbara,” “Nogalte,” “Arevalo”	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	0–4.17	Zhou et al., 2015
Diospyros spp. (6x) staminate germplasm	M	Pollen size and ytological analysis	0–2.30	Xu et al., 2008
Fuchsia Hatschbachii, F. boliviana, F. microphylla, F. encliandra, F. trumpetor, F. fulgens × F. magellanica, F. fulgens × F. splendens, F. triphylla × F. splendens	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	1–13	Talluri, 2011
Geum hybrids	M	Cytological analysis	86 x	Gajewski, 1953
Helianthus F1 hybrids, 11 non-hybrids	M	Pollen size, cytological analysis, progeny analysis, and GISH	27.52 (hybrids), 0.56 (non-hybrid)	Liu et al., 2017
Hibiscus F1 hybrids (4x)	F, M	Pollen size, cytological analysis, flow cytometry, and progeny analysis	–	van Laere et al., 2009
Hydrangea aspera F1 hybrids (H1–10)	M	Pollen size, cytological analysis, and progeny analysis	–	Crespel and Morel, 2014
Ipomoea coccinea, I. quamoclit, I. F1 hybrids, F2 hybrids	M	Cytological analysis and progeny analysis	0.10–92.40	Eckenwalder and Brown, 1986
Iris domestica, Iris dichotoma, F1-5, F2-2, F2-3, BC1-S-2, BC1-S-3, BC1-S-4,BC1-Y −1, BC1-Y −2	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	0.20–2.30	Xu et al., 2021
Lantana camara “Radiation” (4x), “UPL” (4x) “Gold” (4x), “Pink Caprice” (4x), “P604–1” (4x), “GDGHOP-36” (2x), “GDOP-4” (3x), “PCOP-6” (4x), “PKGHOP-1” (2x)	F	Progeny analysis	5.50–100	Czarnecki and Deng, 2009
Lilium F1 hybrids	M	Pollen size, cytological analysis, and flow cytometry	–	van Tuyl et al., 1989
Lilium F1 AuH hybrids	M	Cytological analysis, GISH, and progeny analysis	42	Chung et al., 2013
Lilium F1 hybrid “79418-2”	M	Cytological analysis	25.10	Lim et al., 2004
Lilium F1 LA hybrids	F	GISH and chromosome nomenclature	–	Xiao et al., 2021
Lilium LA hybrids “88542-24,” “88542-69,” “88542-52”	M	Cytological analysis, GISH, and FISH	3–30	Lim et al., 2001
Lotus F1 hybrid “1321/46”	M	Cytological analysis	1.55	Negri et al., 1995
Lotus tenuis	M	Cytological analysis and progeny analysis	–	Negri and Veronesi, 1989
Madia citriodora × gracilis (3x) Layia pentachaeta × platyglossa (2x) Madia nutans × rammii (2x)	M	–	37x 14 x 11.60 x	Clausen et al., 1945
Microseris hybrids	M	–	21 x, 20 x	Chambers, 1955
Medicago coerulea, Medicago sativa, Medicago falcata	F,M	Cytological analysis, and progeny analysis	–	Veronesi et al., 1986
Mertensia echioides P-1, P-2, P-3	M	Pollen size	4–8.50	Malik et al., 2014
Pancratium maritimum	M	Cytological observation	–	Konyar, 2017
Papaver hybrids	M	–	9.01 x	Yasui, 1931
Phalaenopsis Timothy Christonpher (2x), Dtps. Mini Red Rose (2x), P. Little Mary (3x) Dtps. Taisuco Pixie (3x), P. Taisuco Yellow Ball (4x), Dtps. King Shang’s Beaut (4x)	M	Pollen size, cytological analysis, and flow cytometry	0.55–2.84	Zhu et al., 2014
Phegopteris decursivepinnata “3x-1” (3x), “3x-2” (3x)		Cytological analysis and progeny analysis	2.44, 3.18	Nakato and Masuyama, 2021
Populus tomentosa “B111,” Populus tomentosa × Populus bolleana	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	14.3,51.2	Kang and Zhu, 1997
Primula sieboldii (2x, 3x, 4x) 53 cultivars	M	Pollen size	0–10.80 y	Yamaguchi, 1980
Primula hybrids (3x)	F	Progeny analysis and flow cytometry	–	Hayashi et al., 2009
Quamoclit hybrids	M	–	2.41–6.90 x	Kagawa and Nakajima, 1933
Rosa hybrida “H3”	M	Pollen size and progeny analysis	–	El Mokadem et al., 2002a
Rosa hybrida “H190,” “H95,” “H126,” “H61”	F	Progeny analysis	58,79,92,97	El Mokadem et al., 2002b
Rose hybrids “HW”	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	0–9.60	Crespel et al., 2006
Trifolium prutense C0, C1, C2, C3	M	Pollen size and progeny analysis	0.04–47.38	Parrott and Smith, 1986
Trifolium prutense C1	F	Pollen size and progeny analysis	3.40	Parrott and Smith, 1986
Trifolium prutense “Arlington,” “Florex,” “Redman,” “C760”	F	Pollen size and progeny analysis	0.014–0.50	Parrott et al., 1985
Turnera F1 hybrids (5x)	M	Cytological analysis	0.03 2n or 4n	Fernandez et al., 2010; Kovalsky and Neffa, 2012

TABLE 2

Induction of 2n gametes in ornamental plants.

Induction method	Material	Type of unreduced gametesz	Identification method	Frequency of 2n gamete occurrence (%)	References
Caffeine	Lilium F1 Hybrids	M	Flow cytometry, GISH, and progeny analysis	NA y	Lim et al., 2005
Colchicine	Eucalyptus urophylla	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	1.33–28.71	Yang et al., 2016
	Lilium FA hybrids “Jiaoyang”	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	33–83	Piao et al., 2020
	Lilium “Con. Amore,” “Acapulco”	F	Progeny analysis	1.20–9.50, 2.30–25.80	Wu et al., 2007
	Lilium oriental “Sorbonne”	M	Cytological analysis and flow cytometry	68	Liao et al., 2016b
	Lilium “Valdisole”	M	Flower bud sizes	1.50–3.20	Zang et al., 2010
	Populus canescens	M	Progeny analysis, flow cytometry, and cytological obervation	2.75–30.27	Zhou et al., 2020
	Populus tomentosa “B111” or Populus tomentosa × Populus bolleana	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	38.70, 68.50–85.10	Kang and Zhu, 1997
	Populus alba × Populus glandulosa	F	Progeny analysis and cytological observation	NA	Li et al., 2008
	Rosa “Old Blush”	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	0.99–15.83	Zhang et al., 2019a
	Strelitzia reginae	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	20.30	Zheng et al., 2017
	Zantedeschia hybrid “Black magic,” “Flamingo”	F, M	Progeny analysis and cytological observation	NA	Li et al., 2011
Nitrous oxide	Begonia. subvillosa, Begonia F1 hybrids	M	Pollen size, progeny analysis, and flow cytometry	NA	Dewitte et al., 2010a
	Lilium F1 hybrids	F, M	Progeny analysis and cytological observation	NA	Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2006
	Lilium hybrids “Kitazawa-Wase,” “Raizan”	M	Pollen size and progeny analysis	NA	Sato et al., 2009
	Asiatic hybrid lilies “Mona,” “Alaska”	M	Pollen size, flow cytometry, and cytological observation	33–100,75–100	Akutsu et al., 2007
	Lilium hybrids	M	Pollen size, cytological analysis, and flow cytometry	NA	Nukui et al., 2011
	Lilium OT hybrids “Nymph,” “Gluhwein,” “Velloween”	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	NA	Luo et al., 2016
	Phalaenopsis amabilis	M	Progeny analysis, flow cytometry, and cytological analysis	NA	Wongprichachan et al., 2013
	Tulipa “Ile de France,” “Transavia”	M	Pollen size and flow cytometry	17–85	Okazaki et al., 2005
Trifluralin	Begonia cucullate, B. fischeri, B. subvillosa	M	Pollen size, flow cytometry, and progeny analysis	NA	Dewitte et al., 2010a
	Lilium Hybrids	F	Progeny analysis, GISH, FISH, and glow cytometry	NA	Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2006
	Lilium LA hybrid “Bonsior”	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	59.70	Feng et al., 2012
	Rosa chinensis minima	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	NA	Zlesak et al., 2005
High temperature	Rosa hybrids “HW20,” “HW154,” “HW336”	M	Pollen size, cytological analysis, flow cytometry, and progeny analysis	0.10–0.80, 0.60–3.70, 0.70–4.70	Crespel et al., 2015
	Rosa hybrids “HW336”	M	Cytological analysis	1.10–24.50	Pecrix et al., 2011
	Diospyros kaki (6x)	M	Pollen size and cytological analysis	0.77–22.04	Mai et al., 2019
	Populus pseudo-simonii	M	Cytological analysis	20.78–63.09	Wang et al., 2017b
	Populus adenopoda	F	Progeny analysis, cytological observation, and flow cytometry	NA	Lu et al., 2013

Naturally Occurring 2n Gametes

Naturally occurring 2n gametes are mainly derived from two major sources: interspecific or intergeneric hybrids and odd-polyploids (Bretagnolle and Thompson, 1995). Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids have a greater chance to produce 2n gametes at a higher frequency than their parents (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998; Ramanna et al., 2003). The frequency of 2n male gamete formation in traditional cultivars of Cymbidium ranged from 0.5 to 1.0% but 2.5 to 4.03% in interspecific hybrids (Zeng et al., 2020). Unreduced gametes were produced in interspecific or intergeneric hybrids of Alstroemeria (Ramanna et al., 2003), Cyclamen (Ishizaka, 1998), Cymbidium (Zeng et al., 2020), Hibiscus (van Laere et al., 2009), Impatiens (Stephens, 1998), Lilium (Lim et al., 2001, 2004; Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2005), and red clover (Trifolium; Meredith et al., 1995; Table 1). Cytologically, interspecific hybrids either show no chromosome pairing or have abnormal pairing and the presence of lagging chromosomes, chromosome bridges, or univalent in meiosis (Trojak-Goluch and Berbec, 2003; Dewitte et al., 2012; Crespel and Morel, 2014; Wang et al., 2015). Two important features have been reported in 2n gamete formation among interspecific hybrids. First, 2n eggs and 2n pollen could be simultaneously produced by the same hybrid. Second, neither the two parents of the F1 hybrids nor their (F2) sexual polyploid progenies could produce 2n gametes in any notable frequencies (Ramanna and Jacobsen, 2003).

The second source for frequently producing 2n gametes is odd polyploids. Old polyploids are characterized by their karyotypic, genomic, and reproductive instability. As a result, their meiosis may produce gametes with different levels of ploidy, including 2n gametes. For example, triploid lily is generally sterile but can be used as a female parent to produce fertile progenies. In this case, there is an occurrence of 2n gametes. Thus, odd polyploids have been considered a source for 2n gamete formation, and triploids have been used as a bridge between diploids and tetraploids to produce higher polyploids (Köhler et al., 2010).

Artificial Induction of 2n Gametes

Unreduced gametes can be induced by manipulation of environmental factors, temperature in particular and treatment with chemicals, such as nitrous oxide (N2O), trifluralin, colchicine, and oryzalin (Table 2). The treatments, depending on the magnitude, may cause meiosis abnormalities in microspore mother cell, including chromosome separation failure (chromosomal adhesion or backward chromosomes) and spindle abnormalities (parallel, fused, and tripolar spindles; Li et al., 2016; Liao et al., 2016b; Wang et al., 2017b). Of these, parallel and fused spindles, and premature cytokinesis result in the formation of dyads, and the tripolar spindles create the triads during the tetrad period (Wu et al., 2011). These abnormalities could lead to the occurrence of 2n pollen.

Temperature Treatment

Either high or low temperatures have been shown to triggers 2n gamete production (Mason et al., 2011; Pecrix et al., 2011; De Storme et al., 2012; Crespel et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2015; Li et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2017b; Mai et al., 2019); Lokker et al. (2005) grew four complete sterile lily genotypes in a phytotron with an extreme temperature fluctuation regime: four alternating periods of 10 and 30°C each day for 6 weeks and found that three of the four genotypes became fertile as evidenced by the production of viable 2n gametes. Pecrix et al. (2011) observed that the frequency of 2n pollen in Rosa plants after exposure to a high temperature gradient was up to 24.5% compared to the control treatment at 24°C. The 2n pollen mainly resulted from temperature-induced spindle mis-orientations in meiosis II.

Low-temperature treatment can also induce 2n gamete formation. A short period of cold stress at 4–5°C induced the production of diploid and polyploid pollens in Arabidopsis (De Storme et al., 2012). In Datura and Achillea, the frequency of 2n pollen formation was higher at low temperatures (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998; Ramsey, 2007); Mason et al. (2011) demonstrated that cold stress significantly stimulated 2n pollen production in B. napus × B. carinata interspecific hybrids. Zhang et al. (2019b) showed that low temperatures increased the frequency of SDR-type 2n female gametes in the diploid rubber clone GT1.

Chemical Reagents Induction

Colchicine, oryzalin, trifluralin, N2O, and amiprophos-methyl have been commonly used for inducing polyploids and also 2n pollen formation (Younis et al., 2014). Colchicine has been used for inducing 2n pollen of Begonia, Dianthus, Tulipa, Lilium, and other ornamental plants (Okazaki et al., 2005; Akutsu et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2007; Sato et al., 2009; Dewitte et al., 2010a; Lai et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016). N2O can inhibit microtubule polymerization, but not actin filament formation. It was reported that N2O effectively induced 2n gametes (both 2n pollen and 2n egg) in Tulipa (Okazaki et al., 2005), Lilium (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2006; Akutsu et al., 2007), and Begonia (Dewitte et al., 2010a). N2O as a gas can readily penetrate tissue, thereby protecting the tissues from harmful aftereffects as soon as the gas is released (Ostergren, 1954; Kato and Geiger, 2002); Akutsu et al. (2007) showed that effects of N2O were optimal when treatments started during pollen mother cell progression to metaphase I. Using this technique, fertile 2n gametes were induced from sterile hybrids, but the efficiency of the treatment was genotype specific (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2006; Dewitte et al., 2010b).

Potential for Engineering 2n Gametes

With the advance in molecular biology, genes specifically responsible for 2n gamete formation have been increasingly identified. An Arabidopsis gene DYAD/SWITCH1 (SWI1) was found to be responsible for the production of 2n female gametes, resulting in progenies with triploid plants. AtPS1 (Arabidopsis thaliana parallel spindle 1) is another gene involved in 2n gamete formation in Arabidopsis (d’Erfurth et al., 2008). AtPS1 mutants produce up to 65% of 2n pollens, pollination with the pollen resulted in a large number of triploid plants in the next generation. ASMC5/6 (structural maintenance of chromosome 5/6) complex has been identified to be a crucial factor for preserving genome stability (Yang et al., 2021). SMC5/6 mutants show an absence of chromosome segregation during the first and/or second meiotic division, producing 2n gametes. A comparison of the well-established meiotic mutants in alfalfa with the genes identified from Arabidopsis showed that nine proteins belonging to A. thaliana known for their involvement in 2n gamete production occurred in alfalfa, suggesting common lineage of genes implicated in 2n gamete formation (Palumbo et al., 2021). Molecular techniques, particular CRISPR/Cas9 could be used for engineering plants with increased production of either 2n pollen or 2n eggs and used for breeding of novel polyploid ornamental plants.

Use of 2n Gametes for Improving Ornamental Plants

A large number of polyploid ornamental cultivars have been developed through the use of 2n gametes (sexual polyploidization). Table 3 lists some of those across 21 genera, which can be summarized as follows: (1) triploids developed from the cross of diploid × diploid in Cymbidium, Hevea brasiliensis, Lilium, Phalaenopsis, Populus, Rosa, Vaccinium, and Zantedeschia; (2) tetraploids derived from the cross of diploid × diploid, diploid × tetraploid, or tetraploid × diploid in Alstroemeria, Calluna vulgaris, Chrysanthemum, Cymbidium, Dianthus, Lilium, Morus alba, Petunia hybrida, Phalaenopsis, Phegopteris, Rosa, Primula, Pyrus, Ranunculus cantoniensis, Trifolium pretense, and Zantedeschia; (3) pentaploids produced from the cross of diploid × triploid, triploid × diploid, tetraploid × diploid, tetraploid × triploid, or diploid × hexaploid in Fragaria, Lilium, Phalaenopsis, Rosa, Primula, and Phegopteris; (4) hexaploids obtained from the cross of diploid × tetraploid, tetraploid × diploid, tetraploid × tetraploid, triploid × triploid, or diploid × octaploid in Fragaria, Phalaenopsis, Primula, and Phegopteris; and (5) octaploids selected from the cross of tetraploid × tetraploid in Primula. Additionally, sexual triploids of Hevea (Zheng et al., 1983), Populus (Zhang et al., 1992; Li et al., 1994; Kang et al., 2000; Guo et al., 2017), and Zantedeschia (Wu et al., 2011), as well as tetraploids of Petunia (Cai et al., 2020) and Lilium (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2004) were also successfully developed using artificially induced 2n gametes.

TABLE 3

Polyploid cultivars of selected ornamental plants developed through the use of 2n gametes.

Species or genus	Polyploidy obtained	Parents	Changes in Characteristics	References
Alstroemeria	Tetraploid	A. inodora (2x) × A. pelegrina (4x)	NA z	Ramanna et al., 2003
Cymbidium	Triploid	C. × “Dafeng” (2x) × C. sinense “Hezhihua” (2x)	Rounder flowers, wider sepal, petals, and lips	Zeng et al., 2020
	Triploid	C. × “Yunv” (2x) × C. sinense “Xiaoxiang” (2x)	More robust growth with rounder flowers
	Triploid and tetraploid	C. × “Yunv” (2x) × C. sinense “Taipingyang” (2x)	NA
	Triploid	C. × “45–32” (2x) × C. × “45–17” (2x)	NA
	Tetraploid	C. × “45–32” (2x) × C. × “45–32” (2x)	NA
Chrysanthemum	Tetraploid	C. remotipinnum (2x) × C. chanetii (4x)	Intermediate leaf size inherited from female while round-shape blade and petiole from male parents	Abd El-Twab and Kondo, 2007
Cyclamen	Tetraploid	Cyclamen persicum (2x) × C. persicum (4x) or reverse cross	Larger guard cells	Takamura and Miyajima, 1996
Calluna	Tetraploid	Hybrid cultivar 7705 of C. vulgaris (4x) × C. vulgaris (2x)	Semi-fertile triploids with reduced invasiveness	Przybyla et al., 2014
Dianthus	Amphidiploid and tetraploid	D. isebsis (2x) × D. japonicas (2x)	Increased growth vigor	Nimura et al., 2006
Fragaria	pentaploid	F. vesca (2x) × F. elatior (6x)	Vigorous plant growth with profusely flowers	Fedorova, 1934
	Hexaploid	Cultivar of F. vesca L.(2x) × cultivar of F. × ananassa Duch. (8x)	NA	Yanagi et al., 2010
Hevea	Triploid y	GT1 (2x) × RRIC52 (2x)	Fast growth and resistant to albinism	Zheng et al., 1983
	Triploid	GT1 (2x) × seventeen rubber trees (2x)	NA	Yao et al., 2016
Lilium	Pentaploid	BC1 (3x) × LLAA (4x)	NA	Lim et al., 2003
	Tetraploid and hexaploid	4X-OA (4x) × OA hybrids of Lilium (2x)	NA	Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2004
	Triploid and tetraploid	OA hybrids of Lilium (2x) selfing progeny	NA
	Triploid and tetraploid	Asiatic hybrids of Lilium or Oriental hybrids of Lilium (2x) × OA hybrids of Lilium (2x)	NA
	Triploid	OA hybrids of Lilium (2x) × Asiatic hybrids of Lilium (2x)	NA
	Tetraploid	F1 OA hybrids “Vivaldi” (2x) × F1 OA “951301-5” (4x)	NA	Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2006
	Triploid	F1 Longiflorum × Asiatic hybrids (2x) × Asiatic Lily cultivars (2x)	NA	Zhou et al., 2008
	Tetraploid	F1 Longiflorum × Asiatic hybrids (2x) × Asiatic Lily “Tresor” (4x)	Taller stems with robust growth, tolerance to diseases and heat, and increased occurrence in bulbil	Xiao et al., 2021
Lantana	Hexaploid	L.“Pink Caprice” (4x) selfing progeny or L.“Gold Caprice”(4x) selfing progeny	NA	Czarnecki and Deng, 2009
Petunia	Tetraploid y	“Hongxia” (4x) × “Menghuan” (2x)	Organs become bigger	Cai et al., 2020
Phalaenopsis	Triploid and tetraploid	P. Timothy Christonphe (2x) × P. Timothy Christonphe (2x)	NA	Zhou et al., 2009
	Pentaploid	P. Timothy Christonphe (2x) × P. aphrodite (3x) Or Phalaenopsis (3x) × Phalaenopsis (2x)	NA
	Tetraploid	P. Timothy Christonphe (2x) × P. Railin Red Angel (4x) Or P. Railin Red Angel (4x) × P. Timothy Christonphe (2x)	NA
	Pentaploid	P. Brother Yellew Boy (4x) × P. M30049 (3x)	NA
	Hexaploid	P. Ever Spring Light (4x) × P. HO’s French Fantasia (4x)	NA
Populus	Triploid y	(P. alba × P. glandulosa; 2x) × (P. tomentosa × P. bolleana; 2x) or reverse cross	Increased growth vigor	Kang et al., 2000
	Triploid	P. pseudo-simonii × P. nig “Zheyin3#” (2x) × P. beijingensis (2x)	Increased growth vigor	Liao et al., 2016a
	Triploid y	P. simonii or P. simonii × P. nigra var. Italica (2x); P. simonii × (P. pyramidalis + Salix matsudana; 2x)	Increased cell size and growth vigor	Guo et al., 2017
	Triploid y	(P. tomentosa × P. bolleana; 2x) × (P. tomentosa × P. bolleana; 2x)	Vigorous growth with greener leaves	Zhang et al., 1992
Phegopteris	Hexaploid	P. decursivepinnata (3x) selfing progeny	Robust increase of leaf size with vigorous growth of plants	Nakato and Masuyama, 2021
	Tetraploid and pentaploid	P. decursivepinnata (3x) × P. decursivepinnata (2x)	Tetraploid progeny had well-shaped leaves and increased growth vigor. Pentaploid progeny had small and irregularly indented leaves
Primula	Triploid	P. sieboldii (2x) × P. kisoana (2x)	Flowers with a central eye that was pale-yellow or white, some had no eye at all	Kato and Mii, 2000
	Triploid	P. sieboldii (2x) × P. obconica (2x)	Leaves were abnormally folded	Kato et al., 2001
	Triploid and tetraploid	P. malacoides (2x) × P. malacoides (2x)	Compact growth style with round petals and larger flowers	Horn, 2004
	Tetraploid	P. malacoides (2x) × P. malacoides (4x)	Compact growth style with round petals and larger flowers
	Tetraploid	P. malacoides (4x) × P. malacoides (2x)	Compact growth style with round petals and larger flowers
	Tetraploid	P. rosea (2x) × P. denticulata (4x)	Increased stress tolerance	Hayashi et al., 2007
	Hexaploid and octaploid	P. modesta (4x) × P. denticulata (4x) or reverse cross	Vigorous growth with very high pollen fertility	Kato et al., 2008
	Tetraploid, pentaploid, and hexaploid	P. denticulate (4x) × P. modesta (2x)	NA
	Tetraploid and hexaploid	P. modesta (2x) × P. denticulata (4x)	NA
	Pentaploid	DDR hybrid (3x) × P. denticulata (4x)	Increased DNA content	Hayashi et al., 2009
Pyrus	Tetraploid	P. “Dayali” (4x) × P. “Pingguoli” (2x)	NA	Cao et al., 2002
Ranunculus cantoniensis	Tetraploid	R. silerifolius (2x) × R. chinensis (2x)	NA	Okada, 1984
Rosa	Triploid	R. wichuraiana (2x) × H3 (dihaploid)	NA	El Mokadem et al., 2002a,b
	Tetraploid	R. hybrida cv Anna (4x) × H3 (dihaploid)	NA
	Tetraploid	R. hybrida var. F01473 (4x) × H3 (dihaploid)	NA
	Tetraploid	R. hybrida var. FJV6 (4x) × H3 (dihaploid)	NA
	Triploid and tetraploid	Several dihaploid plants of Rosa (2x) × H3 (dihaploid)	NA
Trifolium	Triploid and tetraploid	T. cultivar “Arlington”-A (2x) × T. cultivar C51 (2x)	NA	Parrott et al., 1985
	Tetraploid	T. pretense (2x) × T. pretense (4x)	NA
Tulipa	Triploid	T. gesneriana (2x) × T. fosteriana (2x)	Larger flower, sturdy stem and plant size	Marasek et al., 2006
	Triploid	T. gesneriana (2x) × F1 Darwin hybrid (2x)	NA	Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2014
	Tetraploid and pentaploid	T. gesneriana “Bolroy Silver”(3x) × F1 Darwin hybrid (2x)	NA
Zantedeschia	Triploid y	Pink persuasion (2x) × Black magic (2x) or Black persuasion (2x) × Pink magic (2x)	Increased leaf size with circular deformation	Wu et al., 2011

Polyploidization through 2n gametes represents a new trend in breeding of ornamental plants (Ramanna et al., 2012; Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2021). This is mainly due to the following factors: (1) Ornamental plants are prized by their novelty and esthetic appearance, including flower shape, size, and color; leaf shape, texture, color, and size; plant overall growth form and growth vigor (Henny and Chen, 2003). They are not cultivated for grain production; thus, there is little concern whether or not they are poor in seed production or sterile due to triploid block. Plants with unique phenotypes can be effectively propagated asexually using tissue culture technique to immediately increase the number of plants for commercial production. (2) An increasing number of ornamental plant species has been found to produce 2n gametes (Table 1). The frequency of 2n gamete occurrence typically ranges from 0.1 to 2.0%, but it could be much higher up to 10% in interspecific hybrids (Kreiner et al., 2017a,b; Sun et al., 2021). Many ornamental plants are actually interspecific hybrids (Kato and Mii, 2012). The higher frequencies offer a unique opportunity for breeders to manipulate chromosomes and develop new cultivars of ornamental plants (Table 3), which is described in the following subsections. (3) Polyploid plants, particularly those developed via 2n gametes generally have increased organ size, robust growth form, and improved tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. Sexual polyploidization using 2n gametes allows the introgression of desirable traits in interspecific breeding and results in genetic heterozygosity and heterosis (Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2004, 2005, 2006). Although polyploidization can be attained through mitotic chromosome doubling (Eng and Ho, 2019; Niazian and Nalousi, 2020), this approach does not result in introgression breeding due to the lack of intergenomic recombination. (4) The ornamental plant industry is a fast-growing sector in world agriculture (Chen, 2021). Ornamental plants represent the sixth largest agricultural commodity group in the United States European countries, such as Netherlands produces a large quantity of diverse floriculture crops. The ornamental plant industry in China is blooming. The total turnover for floriculture crops (excluding ornamental trees and shrubs and ornamental grasses and bamboo) was estimated to be $300 billion (Azadi et al., 2016). A key driving force for the continuous growth of the ornamental plant industry is the demand for new cultivars with novel esthetic value (Henny and Chen, 2003; Noman et al., 2017). Thus, polyploidization through 2n gametes has been increasingly used for improving ornamental plants, and this is particularly true in bulbous and orchid crops. Most single and double flowered cultivars of Hippeastrum on the market are tetraploid. The majority of modern intersectional cultivars of Lilium are triploids, and some commercial ones are aneuploids. In the genus Narcissus, nearly 75% of cultivars are tetraploid, but only 12% each for diploid and triploid cultivars. Many tulip, chrysanthemums, and cultivated orchids are polyploid. Most modern commercially valuable rose cultivars are tetraploids. In fact, the availability of these neopolyploids is largely attributed to the functionality of 2n gametes used in breeding, which are briefly discussed as follows:

Cultivar Development Through Interploidy Crosses

Developing new cultivars through interploidy crosses is often difficult due to the difference in ploidy levels. However, the occurrence of 2n gametes can greatly facilitate interploidy crosses, resulting in the development of new polyploid cultivars. The interploidy crosses include 2x × 4x, 4x × 2x, or 2x × 3x. Hybridization of tetraploids with diploids or vice versa produced triploid semperflorens Begonia and Begonia rex (Horn, 2004; Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2016) as well as triploids Lilium (Lim et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2008) and Tulipa (Kroon and Van Eijk, 1977; van Scheepen, 1996). Triploid Aloineae (Brandham, 1982), Dactylis (Jones and Borrill, 1962), Lilium (Lim et al., 2003), Primula (Hayashi et al., 2009), and Tulipa (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2014) crossed with tetraploid counterparts resulted in pentaploid plants, respectively. Hydrangea macrophylla is one of the most economically important ornamental crops worldwide, with United States sales of Hydrangea species topping $120 million in 2014. A recent study showed that diploid (2n = 2x = 36), triploid (2n = 3x = 54), tetraploid (2n = 4x = 72), and even aneuploid H. macrophylla are most fertile and produce viable offspring in interploidy crosses. Triploid and tetraploid offspring can be produced by hybridization of diploid with diploid individuals or by crossing diploid with tetraploid plants, and even crossing triploids with either diploid or tetraploid plants. Such interploidy crosses are due to production of unreduced gametes (Trankner et al., 2020). Triploid hydrangeas have thicker stems, large flowers, and larger stoma compared to full-sibling diploids. These findings explained the origin of triploid hydrangeas and also why there are more triploid cultivars are on the market than diploid cultivars (Alexander, 2020).

Interspecific and Intergenic Cultivar Development

The availability of 2n gametes facilitates interspecific and intergenic hybrid development in ornamental plants. The aims of such hybridizations are to broaden genetic variability or transfer valuable traits, such as disease resistance and novel ornamental characteristics for developing new cultivars. Begonia is one of the largest genera of floriculture crops with more than 2,000 species. It has been divided into several groups based on the origin and growth characteristics. Among them, Elatior-hybrids represent about 88% of the total begonia production (Haegeman, 1979; Kroon, 1993). Most “Elatior” begonia were developed from crosses between different tuberous hybrid species (B × tuberhydrida) and B. socotrana (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2016). Both spontaneous and induced 2n gametes have played important role in the interspecific hybrid development. For example, most “Elatior” hybrids are triploids, and a few are tetraploids (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2016). The occurrence of 2n pollen was common in Begonia with a frequency varied from 1% in Begonia “Rubaiyat” to 100% in “Florence Rita” and B276 (Dewitte et al., 2009), of which FDR was the major mechanism underlying the 2n pollen formation (Dewitte et al., 2010a,b).

Tulip (Tulipa L.) is one the most popular bulbous crops, and its breeding has been aimed at the introgression of new flower colors and shapes, flower longevity, resistance to tulip breaking virus (TBV), Botrytis tulipae, and Fusarium oxysporum into commercial cultivars (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2016). Interspecific crosses were made between T. gesneriana and T. fosteriana (TBV resistant) resulting in a series of cultivars including Darwin hybrids that are highly resistant to BVT virus (van Eijk et al., 1991; van Raamsdonk et al., 1995). More than 50 Darwin hybrid cultivars were developed (van Scheepen, 1996), which were largely derived from sexual polyploidization. This is because some Darwin triploids were fertile and could be backcrossed to T. gesneriana, and some F1 Darwin hybrids could produce 2n and haploid gametes, allowing the generation of polyploids (Marasek-Ciolakowska et al., 2016).

The occurrence of 2n gametes has also led to the formation of new species and new genera. Classical examples are tetraploid species of Tragopogon mirus and T. miscellus in the sunflower family (Soltis and Soltis, 2009). T. mirus (2n = 4x = 24) was derived from the cross of diploid T. dubius with diploid T. porrifolius (2n = 2x = 12), while T. miscellus (2n = 4x = 24) was developed from the cross of T. dubius with diploid T. pratensis. The underlying mechanism for the formation of the two species was explained by unreduced gametes produced by the diploid parents. An early example of synthesized genus is × Aranda orchids (Lee and Tham, 1988). This genus represents a group of intergenic hybrids developed from crosses between Vanda (2n = 2x = 38) and Arachnis (2n = 2x = 38). The initial hybrids (F1) of the two genera had 2n = 2x = 38 but were sterile. However, some of the hybrids produced 2n gametes at a rate up to 10%, and they were fertile as maternal parents. Backcross with either Vanda or Arachnis resulted in × Aranda hybrids with chromosome of 2n = 3x = 57. The vanda parents provide flower color and shape with the stacked strap leaves, and arachnis parents contributes curved, thin petals and fast growth characteristic. They have been widely used as cut flowers due to their vigorous growth and very abundant flowers. More than 200 such hybrids were developed prior to 1985.

Allopolyploid Cultivar Development

There are two types of polyploidy: autopolyploids and allopolyploids. The former display polysomic inheritance, and the latter in most cases show disomic inheritance. In general, allopolyploid plants show higher heterozygosity and heterosis. Lily as one of the most important floriculture crops with four popular genomes: Asiatic (A genome), Longiflorum (L genome), Oriental (O genome), and Trumpet (T genome; van Tuyl and Arens, 2011). Using 2n gametes, along with cut style pollination and embryo rescue, LA, OA, LO, and OT hybrids were developed (Asano and Myodo, 1977; van Tuyl et al., 2000). By somatic chromosome doubling, allotetraploid hybrids of LALA, OAOA, LOLO, OTOT, and LTLT were produced (Xiao et al., 2021). As 2n gametes occurs in those F1 hybrids, interploidy crosses of 2x × 4x produced LAA, OTO, LOO, and AOA cultivars. Additionally, three odd-allotetraploid cultivars, namely Honesty (LAAA; Zhou et al., 2013; Xiao et al., 2019), Original Love (LAAA; Yang et al., 2019; Zheng, 2019), and Santa Rosa (LLLO; Zhang et al., 2012) were developed. Since LA can produce a small number of 2n egg, “Honesty” was developed from a cross of LA × AAAA. LALA can produce a large number of 2n gametes, “Original Love” was selected from the cross of LALA × AAAA. “Santa Rosa” was derived from the cross of LOLO × LLLL or vice versa. Most functional 2n gametes were formed through FDR, and a few were derived from IMR. Compared to diploid, triploid, and other tetraploid plants, the odd-allotetraploid cultivars have taller and stronger stems, produce more bulbils, and resist diseases (Xiao et al., 2021). As 2n gametes are largely produced through FDR, the heterosis is probably attributed to intergenomic differences in the hybrids. Allopolyploidy can confer additional advantages: novel genetic variation, and phenotypes different to the parent species can be produced through transgressive segregation and allelic heterosis.

Triploid Cultivars Derived From 2n Gametes

Triploid plants can be recovered from the cross of 2x × 2x, 2x × 4x, 4x × 2x, or 2x × 3x, of which the cross of one parent that produces 2n gametes with another diploid parent is one of the most common practices (Wang et al., 2016). Studies showed that 2n gametes produced by a female parent plays important role in the successful formation of triploid plant (Ramsey and Schemske, 1998), and this is in part attributed to the appropriate endosperm balance number (Lu et al., 2013). Many triploid cultivars of Narcissus (Brandham, 1986), Lilium (Noda, 1986), Crocus (Ørgaard et al., 1995), and Tulipa (van Scheepen, 1996; Marasek et al., 2006) were developed from unreduced gametes of diploid parents. The early cultivars from the subgenus Narcissus were diploid, from which triploid cultivars arose in the latter half of 19th century due to the occurrence of 2n gametes. Subsequently, tetraploid Narcissus were developed by the end of the 19th century (Brandham, 1986). Tulips are important bulbous flowering plants with more than 8,000 cultivars in the market. Among them, Darwin hybrids represent an important group of cultivars grown for cut flowers, and they are triploids (2n = 3x = 36) developed from interspecific cross of Tulipa gesneriana (2n = 2x = 24) and T. fosteriana (2n = 2x = 24). GISH and median chromosome analyses showed that 24 chromosomes were derived from T. gesneriana and 12 chromosomes were from T. fosteriana (Marasek et al., 2006), suggesting that the one of the most popular groups of tulips, Darwin triploid hybrids were developed through 2n gametes derived from T. gesneriana.

A distinct characteristic of triploid plants is their sterility, known as triploid block, this is a phenomenon resulting in the formation of non-viable progeny after hybridization of plants with different ploidy. This is mainly due to the unbalanced meiotic chromosome segregation and endosperm imbalance (Köhler et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2017a). In ornamental plant breeding, triploid plants can be maintained through vegetative means, such as bulbous propagation in Crocus, Lilium, Narcissus, and Tulipa as well as micropropagation through tissue culture. Triploid ornamental plants generally have higher growth vigor, large flower size, sturdier stem, broader and thicker leaves, or more compact plants compared to their diploid progenitors because the energy that is normally devoted to seed production is used for the growth of flowers and other organs (Miyashita et al., 2009; Tiku et al., 2014). Furthermore, the sterility could be particularly useful for reducing the invasiveness of some ornamental plants. Some important ornamental plants are classified as invasive, as their seed production and dispersal by birds and other means could result in potential colonization of natural habitats that break the balance of native flora (Li et al., 2004). For example, Lantana camara is a popular ornamental plant but is considered an invasive species because its pollen can hybridize with an endangered relative L. depressa in Florida. Studies showed that triploid cultivars of L. camara had lowest pollen stainability at 9.3% compared to 64.6% in diploid and 45.1% in tetraploid cultivars (Czarnecki et al., 2014). Meanwhile, 2n female gametes were found to produce in diploid, triploid, and tetraploid cultivars (Czarnecki and Deng, 2009). Thus, the authors acknowledge that to develop triploid lantana, appropriate parental plants should be carefully selected (Czarnecki et al., 2012).

Triploid sterility, however, may not be completely correct. Increasing evidence shows that many triploids can be used as male or female parent in cross breeding programs (Lim et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2008; Hayashi et al., 2009; Nakato and Masuyama, 2021). Pentaploids and hexaploids were produced by using of triploid as the parents in Phalaenopsis and Primula. In Phalaenopsis, no hybrids were produced from the cross of triploid × triploid; however, hexaploid was obtained from the self-pollinated progeny of triploid P. decursivepinnata. Numerous reports conform that triploid lily is usually sterile and can be used as a female parent to cross with suitable male parents (Lim et al., 2003; Barba-Gonzalez et al., 2006; Khan et al., 2009b; Xie et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2011, 2012, 2014; Chung et al., 2013; Xi et al., 2015; Dhiman et al., 2019); Cui et al. (2022) showed that all triploid lilies are partially fertile when used as female parents even they are completely sterile as male parents. The triploid lilies as female parents can be used to cross with appropriate diploid or tetraploid males to produce aneuploid cultivars.

Performance of Polyploid Hybrids Derived From 2n Gametes

Sexual polyploidization has significantly advanced ornamental plant breeding, resulting in a variety of novel cultivars in the market, including those from Alstroemeria, Begonia, Chrysanthemum, Cymbidium, Lilium, Phalaenopsis, Tulipa, and others. These cultivars have either unique or larger flowers, different colors, robust growth form, and resistance to different abiotic and biotic stresses. Furthermore, sexual polyploidization has resulted in not only new cultivars, but also new species and new genera, accelerating plant speciation. More than 40 years ago, Roose and Gottlieb (1976) demonstrated that T. mirus and T. miscellus, two relatively new allotetraploid ornamental plant species had combined allozyme profiles of the diploid parents (T. dubius and T. porrifolius for T. mirus; T. dubius and T. pratensis for T. miscellus). This report documented the link between genotype and biochemical phenotype as well as enzyme additivity. Now, we are in the age of genomics, polyploidization, particularly through the 2n gamete route, can cause genomic rearrangement (Soltis et al., 2004), changes in gene content and gene number, alternation in gene expression in combination with actions of transposal elements, small RNAs, and epigenetic regulation (Moghe and Shiu, 2014; Li et al., 2019; Williams, 2021). It is truly believed that such changes and interactions will result in different gene expression profiles, metabolism alternation, and morphology differences. With the art of selection, new cultivars and new plants will be developed. We are not concerned about the evolutionary dead-end of polyploidy, rather we are pursuing a better understanding how polyploidization has rearranged the genetic makeup of plants, how the changes alter gene expression, and subsequently phenotypic variation, and how we can better use 2n gametes as a means for developing novel plants and new cultivars.

Conclusion

The exploitation of 2n gametes creates a plethora of opportunities for practical breeding in ornamental plants. Spontaneous production of 2n gametes was found in more than 211 accessions belonging to 37genera, 25 families in ornamental plants. The occurrence frequency of 2n gametes ranges from 0.03 to 100.00%, depending on genetic and environmental factors. In general, the occurrence percentage of 2n gamete in interspecific or intergeneric hybrids was higher than traditional cultivars, but not all of the hybrids produce more 2n gametes. Both diploids and polyploids can produce 2n gametes, which can be used for producing polyploids with different ploidy levels. Triploids are generally thought to be an evolutionary dead-end, but in practice, they can be used as either the male or female parent in a cross-breeding program to produce sexual polyploids. 2n gametes can also be artificially induced by treatment with colchicine, N2O, and trifluralin and by manipulation of temperature. Artificial productions of 2n gametes are successfully achieved in 61 accessions belonging to 10 genera, nine families with the occurrence frequency ranging from 0.1 to 100%. Triploid, tetraploid, pentaploid, hexaploidy, and octaploid ornamental plants were created by the use of 2n gametes. Information gathered from this review shows that polyploid breeding with 2n gametes is an efficient and reliable method for ornamental plant breeding. With ongoing research at the molecular level and research toward efficient methods for inducing 2n gametes, the importance of 2n gametes for ornamental plant breeding will continue to increase in the future.

Author Contributions

LX, JC, and Z-SZ conceived the idea, edited and refined the manuscript. L-ZK and X-QL conducted literature search and wrote the initial draft. All authors read, corrected, and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.