Literature DB >> 19234552

Construction of chromosomal recombination maps of three genomes of lilies (Lilium) based on GISH analysis.

Nadeem Khan1, Rodrigo Barba-Gonzalez, M S Ramanna, Richard G F Visser, Jaap M Van Tuyl.   

Abstract

Chromosomal recombination maps were constructed for three genomes of lily (Lilium) using GISH analyses. For this purpose, the backcross (BC) progenies of two diploid (2n = 2x = 24) interspecific hybrids of lily, viz. Longiflorum x Asiatic (LA) and Oriental x Asiatic (OA), were used. Mostly the BC progenies of LA hybrids consisted of both triploid (2n = 3x = 36) and diploid (2n = 2x = 24) with some aneuploid genotypes and those of OA hybrids consisted of triploid (2n = 3x = 36) and some aneuploid genotypes. In all cases, it was possible to identify the homoeologous recombinant chromosomes as well as accurately count the number of crossover points, which are called "recombination sites". Recombination sites were estimated in the BC progeny of 71 LA and 41 OA genotypes. In the case of BC progenies of LA hybrids, 248 recombination sites were cytologically localized on 12 different chromosomes of each genome (i.e., L and A). Similarly, 116 recombinant sites were localized on the 12 chromosomes each from the BC progenies of OA hybrids (O and A genomes). Cytological maps were constructed on the basis of the percentages of distances (micrometres) of the recombination sites from the centromeres. Since an Asiatic parent was involved in both hybrids, viz. LA and OA, two maps were constructed for the A genome that were indicated as Asiatic (L) and Asiatic (O). The other two maps were Longiflorum (A) and Oriental (A). Remarkably, the recombination sites were highly unevenly distributed among the different chromosomes of all four maps. Because the recombination sites can be unequivocally identified through GISH, they serve as reliable landmarks and pave the way for assigning molecular markers or desirable genes to chromosomes of Lilium and also monitor introgression of alien segments.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19234552     DOI: 10.1139/G08-122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome        ISSN: 0831-2796            Impact factor:   2.166


  6 in total

1.  FISH and GISH: molecular cytogenetic tools and their applications in ornamental plants.

Authors:  Adnan Younis; Fahad Ramzan; Yoon-Jung Hwang; Ki-Byung Lim
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.570

Review 2.  Exploiting Unreduced Gametes for Improving Ornamental Plants.

Authors:  Li Xie; Li-Zhen Ke; Xiao-Qi Lu; Jianjun Chen; Zhi-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags in the extreme large genomes Lilium and Tulipa.

Authors:  Arwa Shahin; Martijn van Kaauwen; Danny Esselink; Joachim W Bargsten; Jaap M van Tuyl; Richard G F Visser; Paul Arens
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 4.  Breeding of lilies and tulips-Interspecific hybridization and genetic background.

Authors:  Agnieszka Marasek-Ciolakowska; Tomotaro Nishikawa; Daniel J Shea; Keiichi Okazaki
Journal:  Breed Sci       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Genome Dominance in Allium Hybrids (A. cepa × A. roylei).

Authors:  David Kopecký; Olga Scholten; Joanna Majka; Karin Burger-Meijer; Martin Duchoslav; Jan Bartoš
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 6.  Competition of Parental Genomes in Plant Hybrids.

Authors:  Marek Glombik; Václav Bačovský; Roman Hobza; David Kopecký
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.753

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.