| Literature DB >> 21663695 |
Annaliese S Mason1, Matthew N Nelson, Guijun Yan, Wallace A Cowling.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unreduced gametes (gametes with the somatic chromosome number) may provide a pathway for evolutionary speciation via allopolyploid formation. We evaluated the effect of genotype and temperature on male unreduced gamete formation in Brassica allotetraploids and their interspecific hybrids. The frequency of unreduced gametes post-meiosis was estimated in sporads from the frequency of dyads or giant tetrads, and in pollen from the frequency of viable giant pollen compared with viable normal pollen. Giant tetrads were twice the volume of normal tetrads, and presumably resulted from pre-meiotic doubling of chromosome number. Giant pollen was defined as pollen with more than 1.5 × normal diameter, under the assumption that the doubling of DNA content in unreduced gametes would approximately double the pollen cell volume. The effect of genotype was assessed in five B. napus, two B. carinata and one B. juncea parents and in 13 interspecific hybrid combinations. The effect of temperature was assessed in a subset of genotypes in hot (day/night 30°C/20°C), warm (25°C/15°C), cool (18°C/13°C) and cold (10°C/5°C) treatments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21663695 PMCID: PMC3141635 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Success of hand crossing between different genotypes of B. napus, B. juncea and B. carinata.
| Paternal | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal | J1 | C1 | C2 | N1 | N2 | N3 | N4 | N5 |
| J1 | - | 0.18 | 0.22 | 2.47 | 2.51 | 4.49 | 1.77 | 1.74 |
| C1 | 0.07 | - | - | 0.14 | 0.03 | - | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| C2 | 0.00 | - | - | 0.03 | 0.07 | - | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| N1 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 4.60 | - | - | - | - | - |
| N2 | 0.13 | 0.36 | 1.00 | - | - | - | - | - |
| N3 | 0.35 | 0.06 | 0.13 | - | - | - | - | - |
| N4 | 0.74 | 0.13 | 0.57 | - | - | - | - | - |
| N5 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.92 | - | - | - | - | - |
B. napus genotypes: N1, N2, N3, N4 and N5, B. carinata genotypes: C1 and C2 and B. juncea genotype: J1. Data are given as seeds per bud pollinated. Within-species combinations and B. carinata ♀ × B. napus N3 ♂ crosses were not performed ("-").
Genetic identity in an experimental interspecific hybrid plant population.
| Species in cross | Genotype ♀ × ♂ | No. plants total | True hybrids from molecular marker results, but with abnormal phenotype | Matromorphs (failed hybridity test, maternal phenotype) | True hybrids from molecular marker results and phenotype | Genotype ♀ × ♂ | No. plants total | True hybrids from molecular marker results, but with abnormal phenotype | Matromorphs (failed hybridity test, maternal phenotype) | True hybrids from molecular marker results and phenotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J1 × C1 | 15 | 1a | 0 | 14 | C1 × J1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| & | J1 × C2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |||||
| J1 × N1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | N1 × J1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | |
| J1 × N2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | N2 × J1 | 3 | 1b | 0 | 2 | |
| & | J1 × N3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | N3 × J1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| J1 × N4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | N4 × J1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| J1 × N5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | N5 × J1 | 4 | 3b | 0 | 1 | |
| N1 × C1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | C1 × N1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| N1 × C2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | C2 × N1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| N2 × C2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | C2 × N2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| & | N3 × C1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||
| N4 × C1 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | ||||||
| N4 × C2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | C2 × N4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
a missing some marker loci from B. carinata parent, presumed aneuploid gamete
b Two copies of alleles from female parent to one copy of alleles from male parent, presumed unreduced female gamete.
Hybridity was confirmed using molecular marker analysis and phenotyping. True hybrids from molecular marker results which had abnormal phenotypes were further characterized using ten additional dosage sensitive molecular markers. B. juncea genotype "J1", B. napus genotypes "N1", "N2", "N3", "N4" and "N5" and B. carinata genotypes "C1" and "C2" were crossed to produce the experimental hybrid population, and a subset of the seeds produced sown out.
Unreduced and abnormal male gamete production in amphidiploid Brassica species estimated by sporad counts.
| Species | Genotype | No. plants | Total no. sporads observed | Total no. of abnormal sporads observed | Abnormal male gamete production | No. dyads observed | 2n male gamete production* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J1 | 4 | 1916 | 1 | 0.03% | 1 | 0.03% | |
| C1 | 3 | 900 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| C2 | 5 | 2322 | 3 | 0.16% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| N1 | 3 | 903 | 3 | 0.25% | 2 | 0.11% | |
| N2 | 3 | 1230 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| N3 | 2 | 700 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| N4 | 2 | 600 | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | |
| N5 | 5 | 1504 | 1 | 0.03% | 1 | 0.03% | |
* 2n male gamete production was estimated by the formula (number of nuclei in dyads)/(number of nuclei in all other sporad types)*100.
Both dyads and giant sporads were assumed to produce unreduced (2n) male gametes, whereas monads, dyads, triads, pentads, hexads and heptads were assumed to produce abnormal male gametes.
Unreduced and abnormal male gamete production in interspecific hybrids of three amphidiploid Brassica species estimated by sporad counts.
| Parental species in hybrid | Hybrid combination | No. plants | Total sporads | Abnormal sporads† | Abnormal male gametes (%) | Dyads | Giant sporads | 2n male gametes (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J1C1 | 13 | 4579 | 79 | 1.97% | 2 | 2 | 0.07% | |
| J1C2 | 6 | 1812 | 10 | 0.74% | 2 | 0 | 0.06% | |
| J1N1 | 12 | 4346 | 292 | 6.17% | 113 | 3 | 1.38% | |
| J1N2 | 5 | 1710 | 202 | 9.33% | 97 | 0 | 2.92% | |
| J1N3 | 4 | 2255 | 209 | 5.94% | 143 | 0 | 3.29% | |
| J1N4 | 3 | 956 | 56 | 3.74% | 36 | 0 | 1.93% | |
| J1N5 | 7 | 2197 | 97 | 2.72% | 73 | 0 | 1.69% | |
| N1C1 | 6 | 2417 | 85 | 2.45% | 52 | 10 | 1.51% | |
| N1C2 | 6 | 1911 | 111 | 5.46% | 40 | 0 | 1.05% | |
| N2C2 | 6 | 2108 | 68 | 2.23% | 46 | 0 | 1.10% | |
| N3C1 | 1 | 301 | 1 | 0.17% | 1 | 0 | 0.17% | |
| N4C1 | 2 | 609 | 9 | 0.95% | 6 | 0 | 0.50% | |
| N4C2 | 6 | 2261 | 155 | 5.43% | 68 | 0 | 1.53% | |
** Significant differences between genotypes (p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA)
***Significant differences between genotypes (p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA)
† Both dyads and giant sporads were assumed to produce unreduced (2n) male gametes, and monads, dyads, triads, pentads, hexads and heptads and giant sporads were assumed to produce abnormal male gametes.
Hybrids were produced between five doubled-haploid derived genotypes of B. napus (B. n: N1, N2, N3, N4 and N5), two doubled-haploid derived genotypes of B. carinata (B. c: C1 and C2) and one near-homozygous inbred genotype of B. juncea (B. j: J1). Interspecific hybrid combinations are given as a combination of parent codes. Hybrid combinations with different maternal parent but the same parent genotypes were pooled after the model unreduced gametes ~ genotype + maternal parent revealed no significant effect of maternal parent on unreduced gamete production.
Figure 1Male unreduced gamete production in two . Unreduced gamete production was assessed by counts of dyads and giant sporads at the sporad stage of pollen development. Temperature treatments were (day 12 h/night 12 h) as follows: hot: 30°C/20°C, warm: 25°C/15°C, cool: 18°C/13°C, cold: 10°C/5°C. Data are given as group averages with ± one standard error bars. J1C1 and C1 plants under the "warm" growth condition died before flowering, and these missing values are indicated by an "x" on the x-axis. * Indicates significant difference (p < 0.001) between that temperature treatment and other temperature treatments for that genotype.
Figure 2Male unreduced gamete formation in . a) A "giant" pollen grain in B. napus and several normal sized pollen grains; b) Putative viable unreduced (large, bright), viable reduced (small, bright) pollen and non-viable (shrunken, dull) pollen in an interspecific hybrid; c) B. napus × B. carinata (CCAB) pollen in cold (10°C day/5°C night) temperature); d) Two dyads produced by a B. napus × B. carinata (CCAB) hybrid in cold (10°C day/5°C night) temperature; e) beginning of telophase II in an interspecific hybrid, showing a tetrahedral nuclei arrangement within the cell as a result of normal, perpendicular spindle orientation, but with laggard chromosomes outside the nuclei and f) Anaphase II showing parallel spindles, a common mechanism of dyad formation in Brassica.
Figure 3Viable pollen size distributions and ploidy in parental lines and cultivars of Brassica. Pollen viability was estimated using fluorescein diacetate stain and pollen diameter was measured under the microscope in μm (viable pollen only), with the expectation that pollen size would be proportional to DNA content of the pollen grain. a) B. rapa (2n = 2x = AA) pollen, expected pollen ploidy n = x = A; b) B. juncea (2n = 4x = AABB), B. napus (2n = 4x = AACC) and B. carinata (2n = 4x = BBCC) pollen, expected pollen ploidy n = 2x = AB, AC or BC respectively; c) 2n = 4x interspecific hybrid B. juncea × B. napus (AABC), B. juncea × B. carinata (BBAC) and B. napus × B. carinata (CCAB) pollen, expected ploidy for reduced pollen n = x - 3x: A-ABC, B-ABC and C-ABC respectively. The bias of the hybrid pollen size distribution to the right suggests unreduced gamete production (ploidy 4x and above) as well as a viability advantage of higher DNA contents (mean of distribution > 2x, expected ploidy distribution x - 3x).
"Giant" pollen observation in amphidiploid Brassica species.
| Genotype | Species | No. of plants | Total viable pollen measured | Giant pollen observed | Giant pollen as a percentage of viable pollen |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J1 | 5 | 653 | 1 | 0.15% | |
| N1 | 2 | 386 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| N2 | 5 | 1001 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| N3 | 3 | 515 | 2 | 0.39% | |
| N4 | 3 | 885 | 1 | 0.11% | |
| N5 | 2 | 419 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| C1 | 4 | 279 | 1 | 0.36% | |
| C2 | 5 | 528 | 1 | 0.19% | |
A pollen grain was determined to be "giant" if the minimum diameter of the pollen grain exceeded 1.5 × the mean pollen diameter observed in pollen production by that plant. No significant differences in giant pollen production were observed between genotypes.
"Giant" pollen observations in Brassica juncea × B. napus (AABC), B. juncea × B. carinata (BBAC) and B. napus × B. carinata (CCAB) hybrids.
| Parental species in hybrid | Hybrid combination | No. of plants | Average pollen viabilityƗ | Average self-pollinated seed set | Total viable pollen measured | Giant pollen | Giant pollen (% of viable pollen)Ɨ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J1C1 | 14 | 6%ab | 99 | 443 | 1 | 0.2%a | |
| J1C2 | 6 | 7%ab | 127 | 626 | 11 | 1.8%a | |
| J1N1 | 8 | 14%b | 0 | 353 | 21 | 5.9%b | |
| J1N2 | 4 | 4%ab | 6 | 227 | 76 | 33.5%c | |
| J1N3 | 4 | 12%ab | 3 | 524 | 50 | 9.5%b | |
| J1N4 | 3 | 9%ab | 2 | 372 | 55 | 14.8%b | |
| J1N5 | 8 | 26%c | 4 | 208 | 20 | 9.6%b | |
| N1C1 | 1 | 1%a | 0 | 21 | 4 | 19.0%abc | |
| N1C2 | 4 | 2%a | 3 | 86 | 26 | 30.2%c | |
| N2C2 | 6 | 0%a | 0 | 0 | - | - | |
| N3C1 | 1 | 0%abc | 0 | 0 | - | - | |
| N4C1 | 2 | 0%ab | 0 | 0 | - | - | |
| N4C2 | 6 | 0%a | 0 | 0 | - | - | |
*** Significant differences between genotypes (p < 0.001, one-way ANOVA)
Ɨ Numbers in the same column followed by the same letters are not significantly different (pairwise t-tests with Holm p-adjustment method for multiple comparisons).
Hybrids were produced between five genotypes of B. napus (B. n: N1, N2, N3, N4 and N5), two genotypes of B. carinata (B. c: C1 and C2) and one genotype of B. juncea (B. j: J1). Hypothetical "giant" pollen size in the hybrids was estimated under the assumptions that a) doubling DNA content would double pollen grain volume, and b) that reduced pollen in hybrids would have a maximum DNA content of 1.5 times parent (2x) DNA content. Hybrid combinations with different maternal parent but the same two parent genotypes were pooled after the model unreduced gametes ~ hybrid genotype + maternal parent revealed no significant effect of maternal parent on unreduced gamete production.
Figure 4Pollen viability estimates for five . Interspecific hybrid genotypes J1N1 and J1N2 are B. juncea × B. napus hybrids from two different B. napus parent cultivars, J1C1 a B. juncea × B. carinata hybrid and N1C2 and N2C2 B. napus × B. carinata hybrids from the same two B. napus cultivars. J1C1 and C1 plants under the "warm" growth condition died before flowering, and these missing values are indicated by an "x". Data are given as group averages with ± one standard error bars.