Literature DB >> 35733033

Clinicopathological features of male patients with breast cancer based on a nationwide registry database in Japan.

Akihiko Shimomura1, Masayuki Nagahashi2, Hiraku Kumamaru3,4, Kenjiro Aogi5, Sota Asaga6, Naoki Hayashi7, Kotaro Iijima8, Takayuki Kadoya9, Yasuyuki Kojima10, Makoto Kubo11, Minoru Miyashita12, Hiroaki Miyata4,13, Naoki Niikura14, Etsuyo Ogo15, Kenji Tamura16, Kenta Tanakura17, Masayuki Yoshida18, Yutaka Yamamoto19, Shigeru Imoto6, Hiromitsu Jinno20.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare; however, its incidence is increasing. There have been no large-scale reports on the clinicopathological characteristics of MBC in Japan.
METHODS: We investigated patients diagnosed with breast cancer in the Japanese National Clinical Database (NCD) between January 2012 and December 2018.
RESULTS: A total of 594,316 cases of breast cancer, including 3780 MBC (0.6%) and 590,536 female breast cancer (FBC) (99.4%), were evaluated. The median age at MBC and FBC diagnosis was 71 (45-86, 5-95%) and 60 years (39-83) (p < 0.001), respectively. MBC cases had a higher clinical stage than FBC cases: 7.4 vs. 13.3% stage 0, 37.2 vs. 44.3% stage I, 25.6 vs. 23.9% stage IIA, 8.8 vs. 8.4% stage IIB, 1.9 vs. 2.4% stage IIIA, 10.1 vs. 3.3% stage IIIB, and 1.1 vs. 1.3% stage IIIC (p < 0.001). Breast-conserving surgery was more frequent in FBC (14.6 vs. 46.7%, p = 0.02). Axillary lymph node dissection was more frequent in MBC cases (32.9 vs. 25.2%, p < 0.001). Estrogen receptor(ER)-positive disease was observed in 95.6% of MBC and 85.3% of FBC cases (p < 0.001). The HER2-positive disease rates were 9.5% and 15.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Comorbidities were more frequent in MBC (57.3 vs. 32.8%) (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy was less common in MBC, while endocrine therapy use was similar in ER-positive MBC and FBC. Perioperative radiation therapy was performed in 14.3% and 44.3% of cases.
CONCLUSION: Japanese MBC had an older age of onset, were more likely to be hormone receptor-positive disease, and received less perioperative chemotherapy than FBC.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Japanese; Male breast cancer; National clinical database

Year:  2022        PMID: 35733033     DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01378-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   3.307


  25 in total

1.  Racial/ethnic differences in survival rates in a population-based series of men with breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Cynthia D O'Malley; Angela W Prehn; Sarah J Shema; Sally L Glaser
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Male breast carcinoma: a review of 229 patients who presented to the Princess Margaret Hospital during 40 years: 1955-1996.

Authors:  P E Goss; C Reid; M Pintilie; R Lim; N Miller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Introducing laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in general practice: a retrospective cohort study based on a nationwide registry database in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kodera; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Hiraku Kumamaru; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Naoki Hiki; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Michitaka Honda; Hiroaki Miyata; Yuichi Yamashita; Yasuyuki Seto; Seigo Kitano; Hiroyuki Konno
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Breast cancer in men.

Authors:  D B Thomas
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Is male breast cancer similar or different than female breast cancer?

Authors:  William F Anderson; Michelle D Althuis; Louise A Brinton; Susan S Devesa
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Breast cancer risk among male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Yu Chuan Tai; Susan Domchek; Giovanni Parmigiani; Sining Chen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth Hale Hammond; Kimberly H Allison; Brittany E Harvey; Pamela B Mangu; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Ian O Ellis; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Lisa M McShane; Mitchell Dowsett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Japanese Current Status of Curative-Intent Surgery for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Masaki Hashimoto; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Shunsuke Endo; Morihito Okada; Hiroaki Miyata; Seiki Hasegawa; Masayuki Chida
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Male Breast Cancer: A Comparative Analysis from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Elimimian; Leah Elson; Hong Li; Hong Liang; Nadeem Bilani; Emily C Zabor; Abby Statler; Zeina Nahleh
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 10.  Male breast carcinoma: increased awareness needed.

Authors:  Jonathan White; Olive Kearins; David Dodwell; Kieran Horgan; Andrew M Hanby; Valerie Speirs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.