Literature DB >> 29846122

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update.

Antonio C Wolff1, M Elizabeth Hale Hammond1, Kimberly H Allison1, Brittany E Harvey1, Pamela B Mangu1, John M S Bartlett1, Michael Bilous1, Ian O Ellis1, Patrick Fitzgibbons1, Wedad Hanna1, Robert B Jenkins1, Michael F Press1, Patricia A Spears1, Gail H Vance1, Giuseppe Viale1, Lisa M McShane1, Mitchell Dowsett1.   

Abstract

Purpose To update key recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer guideline. Methods Based on the signals approach, an Expert Panel reviewed published literature and research survey results on the observed frequency of less common in situ hybridization (ISH) patterns to update the recommendations. Recommendations Two recommendations addressed via correspondence in 2015 are included. First, immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2+ is defined as invasive breast cancer with weak to moderate complete membrane staining observed in > 10% of tumor cells. Second, if the initial HER2 test result in a core needle biopsy specimen of a primary breast cancer is negative, a new HER2 test may (not "must") be ordered on the excision specimen based on specific clinical criteria. The HER2 testing algorithm for breast cancer is updated to address the recommended work-up for less common clinical scenarios (approximately 5% of cases) observed when using a dual-probe ISH assay. These scenarios are described as ISH group 2 ( HER2/chromosome enumeration probe 17 [CEP17] ratio ≥ 2.0; average HER2 copy number < 4.0 signals per cell), ISH group 3 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio < 2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥ 6.0 signals per cell), and ISH group 4 ( HER2/CEP17 ratio < 2.0; average HER2 copy number ≥ 4.0 and < 6.0 signals per cell). The diagnostic approach includes more rigorous interpretation criteria for ISH and requires concomitant IHC review for dual-probe ISH groups 2 to 4 to arrive at the most accurate HER2 status designation (positive or negative) based on combined interpretation of the ISH and IHC assays. The Expert Panel recommends that laboratories using single-probe ISH assays include concomitant IHC review as part of the interpretation of all single-probe ISH assay results. Find additional information at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29846122     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.8738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  349 in total

1.  Automatic quantification of HER2 gene amplification in invasive breast cancer from chromogenic in situ hybridization whole slide images.

Authors:  Md Shakhawat Hossain; Matthew G Hanna; Naohiro Uraoka; Tomoya Nakamura; Marcia Edelweiss; Edi Brogi; Meera R Hameed; Masahiro Yamaguchi; Dara S Ross; Yukako Yagi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-11-21

2.  Prognostic value of response evaluation based on breast MRI after neoadjuvant treatment: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Almir G V Bitencourt; Barbara S Pires; Vinicius F Calsavara; Erika M S Negrão; Juliana A Souza; Luciana Graziano; Camila S Guatelli; Fabiana B Makdissi; Solange M Sanches; Monique C Tavares; Cynthia A B T Osório; Marina De Brot; Elvira F Marques; Rubens Chojniak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Enhancing the Value of Histopathological Assessment of Allograft Biopsy Monitoring.

Authors:  Michelle A Wood-Trageser; Andrew J Lesniak; Anthony J Demetris
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Magee Equations™ and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2-negative breast cancer: a multi-institutional study.

Authors:  Rohit Bhargava; Nicole N Esposito; Siobhan M OʹConnor; Zaibo Li; Bradley M Turner; Ioana Moisini; Aditi Ranade; Ronald P Harris; Dylan V Miller; Xiaoxian Li; Harrison Moosavi; Beth Z Clark; Adam M Brufsky; David J Dabbs
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  HER2-enriched subtype and pathological complete response in HER2-positive breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Schettini; Tomás Pascual; Benedetta Conte; Nuria Chic; Fara Brasó-Maristany; Patricia Galván; Olga Martínez; Barbara Adamo; Maria Vidal; Montserrat Muñoz; Aranzazu Fernández-Martinez; Carla Rognoni; Gaia Griguolo; Valentina Guarneri; Pier Franco Conte; Mariavittoria Locci; Jan C Brase; Blanca Gonzalez-Farre; Patricia Villagrasa; Sabino De Placido; Rachel Schiff; Jamunarani Veeraraghavan; Mothaffar F Rimawi; C Kent Osborne; Sonia Pernas; Charles M Perou; Lisa A Carey; Aleix Prat
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Quantitative digital imaging analysis of HER2 immunohistochemistry predicts the response to anti-HER2 neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Aidan C Li; Jing Zhao; Chao Zhao; Zhongliang Ma; Ramon Hartage; Yunxiang Zhang; Xiaoxian Li; Anil V Parwani
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Mast Cells as an Indicator and Prognostic Marker in Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ecaterina Carpenco; Raluca Amalia Ceauşu; Anca Maria Cimpean; Puşa Nela Gaje; Lilian Șaptefraţi; Veaceslav Fulga; Valeriu David; Marius Raica
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  [Update of the German S3 breast cancer guideline : What is new for pathologists?]

Authors:  A Lebeau; C Denkert; P Sinn; M Schmidt; A Wöckel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Quantitative Image Analysis of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry for Breast Cancer: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists.

Authors:  Marilyn M Bui; Michael W Riben; Kimberly H Allison; Elizabeth Chlipala; Carol Colasacco; Andrea G Kahn; Christina Lacchetti; Anant Madabhushi; Liron Pantanowitz; Mohamed E Salama; Rachel L Stewart; Nicole E Thomas; John E Tomaszewski; M Elizabeth Hammond
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  An evaluation of the safety of continuing trastuzumab despite overt left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  C C Barron; M M Alhussein; U Kaur; T L Cosman; N K Tyagi; M Brown; S D Mukherjee; P M Ellis; S Dhesy-Thind; D P Leong
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.