Literature DB >> 27646509

Major acetabular defects treated with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusion cage and impaction bone allograft in a large series: a 5- to 7- year follow-up study.

Axel Marx1, Alexander Beier1, Anne Richter1, Christoph H Lohmann2, Andreas M Halder1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Major bone defects are the greatest challenge in hip revision arthroplasty.
METHODS: In a prospective, consecutive nonrandomised study we followed up 74 patients with Type III (AAOS) acetabular bone defects who underwent revision hip arthroplasty with bone grafting and implantation of a Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cage (APC). The patients were examined pre- and postoperatively according to a standardised clinical and radiological protocol. No patient was lost to follow-up.
RESULTS: 9 patients died before follow-up. In 9 other patients the APC was revised within the follow-up period. In 4 of these patients the revision was necessary because of aseptic loosening. In the remaining 5 cases joint infection, recurrent dislocation and 1 trauma were the reasons for revision. 56 patients were included in the statistical analysis. In the follow-up group the mean Harris Hip Score increased from 39.9 preoperatively to 73.2. 85% of the patients assessed their operation result as good or excellent.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large consecutive series the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusion cage proved to be a valuable option in the treatment of major acetabular bone defects in hip revision surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27646509     DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  6 in total

1.  The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.

Authors:  Philip P Roessler; Max Jaenisch; Manuel Kuhlmann; Miriam Wacker; P Johannes Wagenhäuser; Sascha Gravius; Dieter C Wirtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Early outcomes of using custom-made augments in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R M Tikhilov; A A Dzhavadov; A S Demin; S S Bilyk; A O Denisov; I I Shubnyakov
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 3.  [Biological downsizing : Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  S Koob; S Scheidt; T M Randau; M Gathen; M D Wimmer; D C Wirtz; S Gravius
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The mid-long term results of reconstructional cage and morselized allografts combined application for the Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Qiang Xiao; Haoyang Wang; Kai Zhou; Duan Wang; Tingxian Ling; Fuxing Pei; Zongke Zhou
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 5.  HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION IN ACETABULAR FRACTURES: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PROPHYLAXIS.

Authors:  Thiago Sanchez Pires Bueno; Gabriel Paris DE Godoy; Rebeca Barros Furukava; Nicole Takakura Gaggioli; Marcel Jun Sugawara Tamaoki; Fabio Teruo Matsunaga; João Carlos Belloti
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.513

6.  Mid-term results in revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafted cup reconstruction for acetabular defects.

Authors:  Sebastian Rohe; Nicoletta Dörr; Sabrina Böhle; Georg Matziolis; Steffen Brodt; Eric Röhner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.