Literature DB >> 24697876

Enhanced recovery pathways lead to an improvement in postoperative outcomes following esophagectomy: systematic review and pooled analysis.

S R Markar1, A Karthikesalingam2, D E Low1.   

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review and pooled analysis is to determine the effect of enhanced recovery programs (ERP) on clinical outcome measures following esophagectomy. Medline, Embase, trial registries, conference proceedings, and reference lists were searched for trials comparing clinical outcome from esophagectomy followed by a conventional pathway with esophagectomy followed by an ERP. Primary outcomes were the incidence of postoperative mortality, anastomotic leak and pulmonary complications, and secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and the incidence of 30-day readmission. Nine studies were included comprising 1240 patients, 661 patients underwent esophagectomy followed conventional pathway, and 579 patients underwent ERP. Utilization of ERP was associated with a reduction in the incidence of anastomotic leak (12.2-8.3%; pooled odds ratios = 0.61; 95% confidence interval = 0.39 to 0.96; P = 0.03) and pulmonary complications (29.1-19.6%; pooled odds ratios = 0.52; 95% confidence interval = 0.36 to 0.77; P = 0.001) and length of hospital stay, and no significant change in postoperative mortality or readmission rate. There was significant variation in the design of enhanced recovery protocols, surgical approach, and utilization of neoadjuvant therapies between the studies that are important confounding variables to be considered. This study suggests a benefit to the utilization of ERP following esophagectomy. The pathways provide a template for all medical personnel interacting with these patients in order to provide incremental changes in all aspects of clinical care that translates into global improvements seen in postoperative outcomes.
© 2014 International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  enhanced recovery programs; esophageal cancer; esophagectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24697876     DOI: 10.1111/dote.12214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  35 in total

1.  Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Fady Yanni; Pritam Singh; Nilanjana Tewari; Simon L Parsons; James A Catton; John Duffy; Neil T Welch; Ravinder S Vohra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Physical decline and its implications in the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linda O'Neill; Jonathan Moran; Emer M Guinan; John V Reynolds; Juliette Hussey
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 3.  Evidence or eminence in abdominal surgery: recent improvements in perioperative care.

Authors:  Josefin Segelman; Jonas Nygren
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Nonintubated anesthesia for thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Bei Wang; Shengjin Ge
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Is There a Rationale for Structural Quality Assurance in Esophageal Surgery?

Authors:  Torben Glatz; Jens Höppner
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-03-24

Review 6.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Expedite recovery from esophagectomy and reconstruction for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after perioperative management protocol reinvention.

Authors:  Yu-Wei Liu; Fan-Wei Yan; Dong-Lin Tsai; Hsien-Pin Li; Yen-Lung Lee; Hung-Hsing Chiang; Hung-Te Hsu; Hung-Yi Chuang; Shah-Hwa Chou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  How minimally invasive esophagectomy was implemented at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital.

Authors:  Edward Cheong
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 9.  Enhanced recovery protocols after oesophagectomy.

Authors:  Laura J Halliday; Sheraz R Markar; Sophie L F Doran; Krishna Moorthy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Esophageal Position Affects Short-Term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Uchihara; Naoya Yoshida; Yoshifumi Baba; Yuichiro Nakashima; Yasue Kimura; Hiroshi Saeki; Shinsuke Takeno; Noriaki Sadanaga; Masahiko Ikebe; Masaru Morita; Yasushi Toh; Atsushi Nanashima; Yoshihiko Maehara; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.