| Literature DB >> 35725784 |
Rockson C Pessoa1, Gabriela F Oliveira-Pessoa1, Brenda K A Souza1, Vanderson S Sampaio1,2,3,4, André Luiz C B Pinto2, Larissa L Barboza1, Gabriel S Mouta1, Emanuelle Lira Silva2, Gisely C Melo1,2, Wuelton M Monteiro1,2, José H Silva-Filho5, Marcus V G Lacerda6,7,8, Djane Clarys Baía-da-Silva1,2,3.
Abstract
The exact path leading to cognitive impairment that goes beyond malaria is unclear, but it appears to be the result of interactive factors. Time of exposure to disease and recurrences are potentially major determinant variables. Cognitive impairment is described mainly in children, rarely in adults. The disease in high endemic areas usually does not affect elderlies, because of acquired immunity over time. However, this population is relatively more frequently sick in lower endemic areas, such as in the Amazon. This study assessed the effect of Plasmodium vivax malaria on the executive and cognitive functions of elderlies, in the Brazilian Amazon. A cohort study was conducted to evaluate executive and cognitive functions one week (T0), two months (T2) and eight months (T8) after the malaria episode. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Wechsler adult intelligence scale (WAIS-III), and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) were used to assess executive and cognitive functions. One hundred-forty elderlies were enrolled (70 with P. vivax malaria and 70 without malaria). P. vivax malaria was associated with impairment of the executive and cognitive functions in elderlies for up to 8 months after acute P. vivax malaria. Prior history of malaria, recurrences and higher parasitemia were independently associated with various surrogates of executive and cognitive impairment. With the increase in life expectancy, elderlies living in malaria endemic areas will deserve more attention from health authorities, to guarantee improvement of their quality of life in the tropics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35725784 PMCID: PMC9208538 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14175-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Flowchart of the study.
Demographic and clinical characteristics in the baseline.
| Characteristics | Total | Non exposed to malaria | Exposed to malaria | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years, median (IQR) | 66.0 (63.0–71.5) | 69.0 (65.0–73.0) | 65.0 (63.0–69.0) | |
| Female | 72/140 (51.4%) | 46/70 (65.7%) | 26/70 (37.1%) | |
| Male | 68/140 (48.6%) | 24/70 (34.3%) | 44/70 (62.9%) | |
| Illiterate | 10/140 (7.1%) | 2/70 (2.9%) | 8/70 (11.4%) | |
| Primary | 75/140 (53.6%) | 32/70 (45.7%) | 43/70 (61.4%) | |
| High school | 32/140 (22.9%) | 22/70 (31.4%) | 10/70 (14.3%) | |
| University | 23/140 (16.4%) | 14/70 (20.0%) | 9/70 (12.9%) | |
| Use of psychotropic, % | 7/140 (5.0%) | 3/70 (4.3%) | 4/70 (5.7%) | 0.70 |
| 0.50 | ||||
| Married | 87/140 (62.1%) | 44/70 (62.9%) | 43/70 (61.4%) | |
| Divorced | 10/140 (7.1%) | 7/70 (10.0%) | 3/70 (4.3%) | |
| Widowed | 22/140 (15.7%) | 9/70 (12.9%) | 13/70 (18.6%) | |
| Single | 21/140 (15.0%) | 10/70 (14.3%) | 11/70 (15.7%) | |
| 0.20 | ||||
| 1–2 MW | 98/140 (70.0%) | 45/70 (64.3%) | 53/70 (75.7%) | |
| 3–4 MW | 28/140 (20.0%) | 14/70 (20.0%) | 14/70 (20.0%) | |
| 5–6 MW | 6/140 (4.3%) | 5/70 (7.1%) | 1/70 (1.4%) | |
| 7–8 MW | 6/140 (4.3%) | 5/70 (7.1%) | 1/70 (1.4%) | |
| Above 10 MW | 2/140 (1.4%) | 1/70 (1.4%) | 1/70 (1.4%) | |
| 0.14 | ||||
| Retired | 79/140 (56.4%) | 43/70 (61.4%) | 36/70 (51.4%) | |
| Pensioner | 11/140 (7.9%) | 7/70 (10.0%) | 4/70 (5.7%) | |
| Self-employed | 7/140 (5.0%) | 1/70 (1.4%) | 6/70 (8.6%) | |
| Housewife | 10/140 (7.1%) | 6/70 (8.6%) | 4/70 (5.7%) | |
| Never worked | 33/140 (23.6%) | 13/70 (18.6%) | 20/70 (28.6%) | |
| 0.14 | ||||
| Own | 126/139 (90.6%) | 62/69 (89.9%) | 64/70 (91.4%) | |
| Rented | 6/139 (4.3%) | 5/69 (7.2%) | 1/70 (1.4%) | |
| Family residence | 7/139 (5.0%) | 2/69 (2.9%) | 5/70 (7.1%) | |
| Leisure, activities, median (IQR) | 3.0 (2.0–5.0) | 3.5 (2.0–5.0) | 3.0 (2.0–5.0) | 0.051 |
| At T2 | 3.0 (1.5–6.0) | 3.0 (1.0–5.0) | 4.0 (2.0–7.0) | 0.23 |
| At T8 | 4.5 (2.0–7.0) | 5.0 (3.0–8.0) | 4.0 (2.0–7.0) | 0.13 |
| At T2, median (IQR) | 10.9 (10.1–12.1) | 10.6 (10.0–12.0) | 11.2 (10.2–12.1) | 0.22 |
| At T8, mean (SD) | 11.2 (1.9) | 11.0 (2.0) | 11.3 (1.7) | 0.39 |
Significant values are in bold.
Figure 2Cognitive (A,B) and executive performance (C) assessed by Clock Drawing Test (A), Mini-Mental State Examination (B) and WAIS-III (C).
Figure 3Executive performance assessed by WCST indicators. (A) Number of categories completed, (B) number total corrects (C) perseverative responses, (D) perseverative errors, (E) nonperseverative errors, (F) percent conceptual level responses and (G) failure to maintain set.