| Literature DB >> 35721284 |
Andrew H Talal1, Yu-Xin Ding2, Marianthi Markatou2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Even though substance users have the highest hepatitis C virus (HCV) burden, many lack knowledge about the infection. Lack of knowledge is an important obstacle to pursuing HCV care. Although printed materials are conventionally utilized to disseminate HCV-related knowledge, narrative story-telling videos may be an alternative. Data are extremely limited, however, in the ability of storytelling videos to increase HCV knowledge among substance users. In this study, we hypothesized that a story-telling narrative video would increase substance user's immediate and 1-month HCV-related knowledge compared to a printed format. AIM: To assess immediate and 1-month HCV-related knowledge retention among substance users comparing education delivered via a storytelling narrative video compared to a printed format.Entities:
Keywords: Decision-making in healthcare; Hepatitis C Virus; Hepatitis C virus education; Hepatitis C virus knowledge; Persons with opioid use disorder
Year: 2022 PMID: 35721284 PMCID: PMC9157714 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i5.972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Hepatol
Demographic characteristics of study participants
|
|
|
|
|
| 90 | 86 |
| Age | ||
| Median (IQR) | 41 (18) | 40(18) |
| Mean (SD) | 43 (11) | 41(12) |
| Gender | ||
| Female | 55 (61%) | 51 (59%) |
| Male | 35 (39%) | 35 (41%) |
| Race | ||
| White | 76 (84%) | 74 (86%) |
| Other races | 14 (16%) | 12 (14%) |
IQR: Interquartile ratio; SD: Standard deviation.
Figure 1The distribution of improvement in scores calculated as the pre-intervention subtracted from the post-intervention for both interventions are illustrated in the violin plot wrapping a boxplot. The box extends from the 25th to the 75th percentile with lines extending outward depicting the smallest value within 1.5 times the interquartile range (IQR) below the 25th percentile and largest value within 1.5 times the IQR above the 75th percentile. The dark line in the middle of the box illustrates the median values. Peach indicates the control site (brochure) and blue (video) the intervention site. The violin displays the density plot of the values, where the width indicates the frequency.
Figure 2Illustrated are mean scores for the assessments obtained pre- and post- as well as after one month after the video (blue) and brochure (red/peach) educational interventions.
Descriptive statistics associated with pre-education scores of individuals recruited on site and those recruited via phone
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| ||
| Mean (SD) | 19.3 (2.27) | 18.6 (2.51) | 19.0 (2.38) |
| Median (Min, Max) | 19.0 ([15, 24]) | 18.5 ([13, 24]) | 19.0 ([13, 24]) |
SD: Standard deviation.
Results of type III tests of fixed effects
|
|
|
|
| Age | 0.92 | 0.3378 |
| Gender | 0 | 0.9710 |
| Race | 2.62 | 0.1072 |
| Educational intervention | 4.65 | 0.0326 |
| Time point | 13.01 | 0.0004 |
| Educational intervention × time point | 0.41 | 0.5219 |
| Baseline score (Pre-education score) | 36.22 | < 0.0001 |
Race is categorized into to two levels: white and other races.
Educational intervention indicates either the intervention or the control group.
Time point indicates the post-education or one-month follow up assessment.