Manar Abu Abed1, Wolfgang Himmel2, Stefan Vormfelde1, Janka Koschack3. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany. 2. Department of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany. 3. Department of General Practice, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany. Electronic address: jkoscha@gwdg.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of video-assisted patient education to modify behavior. METHODS: Fourteen databases were searched for articles published between January 1980 and October 2013, written in English or German. Behavioral change as main outcome had to be assessed by direct measurement, objective rating, or laboratory data. RESULTS: Ten of the 20 reviewed studies reported successful behavioral modification in the treatment group. We discerned three different formats to present the information: didactic presentation (objective information given as verbal instruction with or without figures), practice presentation (real people filmed while engaged in a specific practice), narrative presentation (real people filmed while enacting scenes). Seven of the ten studies reporting a behavioral change applied a practice presentation or narrative presentation format. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of video-assisted patient education is a matter of presentation format. Videos that only provide spoken or graphically presented health information are inappropriate tools to modify patient behavior. Videos showing real people doing something are more effective. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If researchers wish to improve a skill, a model patient enacting the behavior seems to be the best-suited presentation format. If researchers aim to modify a more complex behavior a narrative presentation format seems to be most promising.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of video-assisted patient education to modify behavior. METHODS: Fourteen databases were searched for articles published between January 1980 and October 2013, written in English or German. Behavioral change as main outcome had to be assessed by direct measurement, objective rating, or laboratory data. RESULTS: Ten of the 20 reviewed studies reported successful behavioral modification in the treatment group. We discerned three different formats to present the information: didactic presentation (objective information given as verbal instruction with or without figures), practice presentation (real people filmed while engaged in a specific practice), narrative presentation (real people filmed while enacting scenes). Seven of the ten studies reporting a behavioral change applied a practice presentation or narrative presentation format. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of video-assisted patient education is a matter of presentation format. Videos that only provide spoken or graphically presented health information are inappropriate tools to modify patient behavior. Videos showing real people doing something are more effective. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: If researchers wish to improve a skill, a model patient enacting the behavior seems to be the best-suited presentation format. If researchers aim to modify a more complex behavior a narrative presentation format seems to be most promising.
Authors: Courtney Lynam Scherr; Kelli Nam; Bianca Augusto; Monica L Kasting; Meghan Caldwell; Marie Catherine Lee; Cathy D Meade; Tuya Pal; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: Health Commun Date: 2019-04-18
Authors: Amarbir S Gill; Philip C Biggs; Garrett Hagwood; Angela M Beliveau; Kiarash Shahlaie; E B Strong; Toby O Steele Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2021-05-17
Authors: Pearl A McElfish; Brett Rowland; Sheldon Riklon; Nia Aitaoto; Ka'imi A Sinclair; Shumona Ima; Susan A Kadlubar; Peter A Goulden; Jonell S Hudson; Sammie Mamis; Christopher R Long Journal: Policy Polit Nurs Pract Date: 2019-09-19
Authors: C Vandelanotte; C Short; R C Plotnikoff; C Hooker; D Canoy; A Rebar; S Alley; S Schoeppe; W K Mummery; M J Duncan Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Britta Larsen; Tanya Benitez; Mayra Cano; Shira S Dunsiger; Bess H Marcus; Andrea Mendoza-Vasconez; James F Sallis; Michelle Zive Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 5.428