Amber Arain1, Jessica De Sousa2, Kirsten Corten2, Rita Verrando3, Herbert Thijs4, Catharina Mathei5, Frank Buntinx6, Geert Robaeys7. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universiteit Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium. Electronic address: amber.arain@uhasselt.be. 2. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universiteit Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium. 3. Medisch Sociaal Opvang Centrum, Genk, Belgium. 4. I-BioStat, Universiteit Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium. 5. Free Clinic, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 6. Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Belgium and Maastricht University, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universiteit Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium; Department of Hepatology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment uptake for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains low in persons who inject drugs (PWID), due to lack of knowledge and low perceived need for treatment. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to assess the influence on knowledge and willingness for HCV screening and treatment among persons who use drugs (PWUD) by combining formal and peer education with FibroScan measurement. METHODS:Clients of the Center for Alcohol and other Drug problems (CAD) in Limburg (Belgium) were randomized into a control group, which received the standard of care, and an intervention group, which received an innovative combination of formal and peer education followed by FibroScan. Knowledge of HCV infection and willingness for screening and treatment were evaluated at baseline, after intervention and 1 and 3months after intervention by means of questionnaires. RESULTS:Baseline knowledge was similar for the control (n=27) and the intervention group (n=25) (58 vs. 59%; p=0.67). Immediately after the information session, knowledge increased to 86% (p<0.001) in the intervention group. After 3months, knowledge decreased significantly (69%; p=0.01). No significant changes in knowledge were found in the control group. Baseline willingness for treatment was 81% in both the control and intervention groups, but after 1 month decreased in the control group (44%) and remained stable in the intervention group (75%). Differences in actual screening uptake between the control and intervention group were not significant (7% vs. 20%). Four percent of the intervention group and no one in the control group started treatment. CONCLUSION: The small number of subjects should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. In brief, the single information session significantly improved HCV knowledge among PWUD, but did not result in a higher uptake for screening and treatment. This could signify that there are other important reasons, besides lack of knowledge, not to undergo screening or start treatment. The fact that knowledge decreased after 3months indicates that it would be beneficial to repeat the information session regularly.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Treatment uptake for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains low in persons who inject drugs (PWID), due to lack of knowledge and low perceived need for treatment. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to assess the influence on knowledge and willingness for HCV screening and treatment among persons who use drugs (PWUD) by combining formal and peer education with FibroScan measurement. METHODS: Clients of the Center for Alcohol and other Drug problems (CAD) in Limburg (Belgium) were randomized into a control group, which received the standard of care, and an intervention group, which received an innovative combination of formal and peer education followed by FibroScan. Knowledge of HCV infection and willingness for screening and treatment were evaluated at baseline, after intervention and 1 and 3months after intervention by means of questionnaires. RESULTS: Baseline knowledge was similar for the control (n=27) and the intervention group (n=25) (58 vs. 59%; p=0.67). Immediately after the information session, knowledge increased to 86% (p<0.001) in the intervention group. After 3months, knowledge decreased significantly (69%; p=0.01). No significant changes in knowledge were found in the control group. Baseline willingness for treatment was 81% in both the control and intervention groups, but after 1 month decreased in the control group (44%) and remained stable in the intervention group (75%). Differences in actual screening uptake between the control and intervention group were not significant (7% vs. 20%). Four percent of the intervention group and no one in the control group started treatment. CONCLUSION: The small number of subjects should be considered when interpreting the results of this study. In brief, the single information session significantly improved HCV knowledge among PWUD, but did not result in a higher uptake for screening and treatment. This could signify that there are other important reasons, besides lack of knowledge, not to undergo screening or start treatment. The fact that knowledge decreased after 3months indicates that it would be beneficial to repeat the information session regularly.
Authors: Des Crowley; Walter Cullen; Eamon Laird; John S Lambert; Tina Mc Hugh; Carol Murphy; Marie Claire Van Hout Journal: J Transl Int Med Date: 2017-06-30
Authors: Laura E Starbird; Chakra Budhathoki; Hae-Ra Han; Mark S Sulkowski; Nancy R Reynolds; Jason E Farley Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2019-12-09 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Tatum N Oleskowicz; Taylor A Ochalek; Kelly R Peck; Gary J Badger; Stacey C Sigmon Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Helen R Stagg; Julian Surey; Marie Francis; Jennifer MacLellan; Graham R Foster; André Charlett; Ibrahim Abubakar Journal: BMC Med Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Desmond Crowley; Ross Murtagh; Walter Cullen; Mary Keevans; Eamon Laird; Tina McHugh; Susan McKiernan; Sarah Jayne Miggin; Eileen O'Connor; Deirdre O'Reilly; Graham Betts-Symonds; Ciara Tobin; Marie Claire Van Hout; John S Lambert Journal: Harm Reduct J Date: 2019-07-05
Authors: Geoff McCombe; Davina Swan; Eileen O'Connor; Gordana Avramovic; Peter Vickerman; Zoe Ward; Julian Surey; Juan Macías; John S Lambert; Walter Cullen Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2018-06-04