Literature DB >> 3571728

Gap detection and the auditory filter: phase effects using sinusoidal stimuli.

M J Shailer, B C Moore.   

Abstract

Psychometric functions were determined for the detection of temporal gaps in sinusoidal signals at center frequencies between 0.2 and 2.0 kHz. A continuous notched-noise masker was used to restrict listening to the signal frequency region. The gap always started when the signal was at a positive-going zero crossing. There were three different conditions for the starting phase of the signal at the termination of the gap. In the standard-phase condition the signal restarted at a positive-going zero crossing, in the reversed-phase condition at a negative-going zero crossing, and in the preserved-phase condition at the phase the signal would have had if the gap had not been present. In the standard-phase and reversed-phase conditions the psychometric functions were nonmonotonic, showing oscillations with a period equal to that of the signal; maxima in the functions for the standard-phase condition coincided with minima in the functions for the reversed-phase condition, and vice versa. In the preserved-phase condition the psychometric functions were monotonic and the 75% points were roughly independent of center frequency, having a value of about 5 ms. The general form of the results can be modeled by a filter bank followed by a square-law device and a temporal integrator, but good agreement between the data and the model could not be attained across the whole range of gap durations. The deviations between data and model suggest that subjects are sensitive to the brief transitions in phase (or, equivalently, in frequency) in some conditions.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3571728     DOI: 10.1121/1.394631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Forward masking additivity and auditory compression at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Catherine G O'Hanlon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

2.  Tinnitus Does Not Interfere with Auditory and Speech Perception.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Matthew Richardson; Katie Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Basic auditory processes involved in the analysis of speech sounds.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Temporal integration in vowel perception.

Authors:  Andrew B Wallace; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of non-simultaneous masking on the binaural masking level difference.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall Iii
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comparing different estimates of cochlear compression in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Peninah S Rosengard; Andrew J Oxenham; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression: additivity of forward masking in noise-masked normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory gap-in-noise detection behavior in ferrets and humans.

Authors:  Joshua R Gold; Fernando R Nodal; Fabian Peters; Andrew J King; Victoria M Bajo
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Audition-specific temporal processing deficits associated with language function in children with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Jennifer H Foss-Feig; Kimberly B Schauder; Alexandra P Key; Mark T Wallace; Wendy L Stone
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.