Literature DB >> 3571294

The relationship between trunk muscle electromyography and lifting moments in the sagittal and frontal planes.

R E Seroussi, M H Pope.   

Abstract

In this study, we explore the relationship between moments in the frontal and sagittal planes, generated by a lifting task, vs the electromyographic (EMG) activity of right and left trunk muscle groups. In particular, we postulate that the functional dependence between erector spinae muscle activity and the applied lifting moments about the spine is as follows: the sum of left and right erector spinae processed EMG depends on the sagittal plane moment, and the difference of left and right erector spinae processed EMG depends on the frontal plane moment. A simple out-of-sagittal plane physical model, treating the lumbar spine as a two degree-of-freedom pivot point is discussed to justify these hypotheses. To validate this model, we collected surface EMG and lifting moment data for ten males performing a grid of frontal and sagittal plane lifting tasks. A digital RMS-to-DC algorithm was developed for processing raw EMG. For these tests, we measured EMG for the left and right erector spinae and for the left and right external oblique muscles. The processed EMG signals of the left and right erector spinae muscles are summed and differenced for comparison to the measured sagittal and frontal plane moments. A linear correlation (r2) of 0.96 was obtained for the sum of erector spinae EMG vs the sagittal plane moment; a corresponding value of r2 = 0.95 was obtained for the difference vs the frontal plane moment. No correlations (r2 less than 0.004) was found for the sagittal plane moment and the difference of the left and right erector spinae EMG, and the frontal plane moment and the sum of the left and right erector spinae EMG.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3571294     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90305-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  Activation amplitude patterns do not change for back muscles but are altered for abdominal muscles between dominant and non-dominant hands during one-handed lifts.

Authors:  Heather L Butler; Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey; John W Kozey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Mechanically corrected EMG for the continuous estimation of erector spinae muscle loading during repetitive lifting.

Authors:  J R Potvin; R W Norman; S M McGill
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

3.  Loads in the spinal structures during lifting: development of a three-dimensional comprehensive biomechanical model.

Authors:  J S Han; V K Goel; J Y Ahn; J Winterbottom; D McGowan; J Weinstein; T Cook
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Effects of fatigue on trunk stability in elite gymnasts.

Authors:  Jaap H van Dieën; Tessy Luger; Jeroen van der Eb
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Trunk antagonist co-activation is associated with impaired neuromuscular performance.

Authors:  N Peter Reeves; Jacek Cholewicki; Theodore Milner; Angela S Lee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  EMG Processing Based Measures of Fatigue Assessment during Manual Lifting.

Authors:  E F Shair; S A Ahmad; M H Marhaban; S B Mohd Tamrin; A R Abdullah
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-19       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  A study on the paraspinal muscle surface electromyography in acute nonspecific lower back pain.

Authors:  Jie Qiao; Shu-Li Zhang; Jun Zhang; Dan Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Lower trunk kinematics and muscle activity during different types of tennis serves.

Authors:  John W Chow; Soo-An Park; Mark D Tillman
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2009-10-13

9.  Biomechanical analysis of reducing sacroiliac joint shear load by optimization of pelvic muscle and ligament forces.

Authors:  J J M Pel; C W Spoor; A L Pool-Goudzwaard; G A Hoek van Dijke; C J Snijders
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.934

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.