| Literature DB >> 35711667 |
Sudhir Kumar1, Xue Li2, Marina McDew-White2, Ann Reyes2, Elizabeth Delgado2, Abeer Sayeed2, Meseret T Haile1, Biley A Abatiyow1, Spencer Y Kennedy1, Nelly Camargo1, Lisa A Checkley3, Katelyn V Brenneman3, Katrina A Button-Simons3, Manoj T Duraisingh4, Ian H Cheeseman5, Stefan H I Kappe1,6, François Nosten7,8, Michael T Ferdig3, Ashley M Vaughan1,6, Tim J C Anderson2.
Abstract
What genes determine in vitro growth and nutrient utilization in asexual blood-stage malaria parasites? Competition experiments between NF54, clone 3D7, a lab-adapted African parasite, and a recently isolated Asian parasite (NHP4026) reveal contrasting outcomes in different media: 3D7 outcompetes NHP4026 in media containing human serum, while NHP4026 outcompetes 3D7 in media containing AlbuMAX, a commercial lipid-rich bovine serum formulation. To determine the basis for this polymorphism, we conducted parasite genetic crosses using humanized mice and compared genome-wide allele frequency changes in three independent progeny populations cultured in media containing human serum or AlbuMAX. This bulk segregant analysis detected three quantitative trait loci (QTL) regions [on chromosome (chr) 2 containing aspartate transaminase AST; chr 13 containing EBA-140; and chr 14 containing cysteine protease ATG4] linked with differential growth in serum or AlbuMAX in each of the three independent progeny pools. Selection driving differential growth was strong (s = 0.10 - 0.23 per 48-hour lifecycle). We conducted validation experiments for the strongest QTL on chr 13: competition experiments between ΔEBA-140 and 3D7 wildtype parasites showed fitness reversals in the two medium types as seen in the parental parasites, validating this locus as the causative gene. These results (i) demonstrate the effectiveness of bulk segregant analysis for dissecting fitness traits in P. falciparum genetic crosses, and (ii) reveal intimate links between red blood cell invasion and nutrient composition of growth media. Use of parasite crosses combined with bulk segregant analysis will allow systematic dissection of key nutrient acquisition/metabolism and red blood cell invasion pathways in P. falciparum.Entities:
Keywords: AlbuMAX; Plasmodium falciparum; bulk segregant analysis; genetic cross; serum
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35711667 PMCID: PMC9197316 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.878496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Figure 2Mapping parasite fitness under different culture conditions. (A). Recombinant progeny pool generation. Genetic crosses were generated using female Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes and FRG huHep mice as described by Vaughan, 2015. Recombination of parasite genomes occurs during meiosis in the mosquito midgut. Recombinant pools were collected from infected mice and maintained in in vitro asexual blood stage culture. (B). Bulk segregant analysis. Pools of progeny were cultured in parallel with serum or AlbuMAX and samples were collected every four days. Each segregant pool was then whole-genome sequenced and genotyped in bulk. Differences in allele frequency among different groups were used to identify QTLs.
Figure 1Outcome of competition between 3D7 and NHP4026 under different culture conditions. (A). Proportion of NHP4026 at each parasite asexual cycle. (B). NHP4026 selection coefficients (s) with 1× standard error. Positive s values indicate a disadvantage for alleles inherited from NHP4026. Culture conditions: AlbuMAX, medium contained only AlbuMAX; Ser:Alb, medium contained serum and AlbuMAX at a 50:50 ratio; Serum, culture medium contained only serum.
Figure 3Change in genome frequency under different culture conditions. The black lines show allele frequencies from the initial recombinant pools. Yellow-red lines show frequency changes in serum over time and light blue-dark blue lines show frequency changes over time in or AlbuMAX. The three plots show allele frequencies from the three recombinant pools (biological replicates). The lines with the same color in each panel show values for the two technical replicates.
Top candidate genes located inside of the QTL regions.
| QTL ID | QTL | 95% CI | Gene ID | Gene name | Gene annotation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| chr. 2 | serum vs AlbuMAX | chr2: 0 – 220,805 | PF3D7_0204500 | aspartate transaminase | |
| chr. 13 | serum vs AlbuMAX | chr13: 0 – 162,844 | PF3D7_1301600 | erythrocyte binding antigen-140 | |
| chr. 14.1 | serum vs AlbuMAX | chr14: 629,528-812,881 | PF3D7_1417300 | cysteine protease ATG4 | |
| chr. 7 | serum and AlbuMAX | chr7:340,864 - 476,223 | PF3D7_0709000 | chloroquine resistance transporter | |
| chr. 12 | serum and AlbuMAX | chr12:1,141,368 - 1,282,609 | PF3D7_1229100 | multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 | |
| chr. 14.2 | serum and AlbuMAX | chr14:2,356,428 - 2,485,473 | PF3D7_1460900 | apicoplast ribosomal protein S10 | |
a, serum vs AlbuMAX QTLs were identified by comparing differential growth in human serum and AlbuMAX; serum/AlbuMAX QTLs were detected in both Serum and AlbuMAX.
b, 95% confidence interval (CI) using Li’s method (Li, 2011).
Figure 4QTLs defined with the G’ approach. The top (A) and middle (B) panels show QTLs detected by comparing allele frequencies from the initial recombinant pools and pools after 30 days of serum (top) or AlbuMAX (middle) culture. The bottom panel (C) indicates QTLs at day 30 when comparing serum and AlbuMAX cultures. There are three plots in each panel, representing analyses from the three recombinant pools (biological replicates). Orange and black lines delineate technical replicates in each experiment. We used a threshold (G’ > 20) to determine significant QTLs. Arrows mark the position of QTLs identified.
Figure 5Genes within defined QTL regions. (A–C). QTLs detected through comparing allele frequencies from the initial recombinant pools and pools after 30 days of serum (orange) or AlbuMAX (green) culture. (D–F). QTLs detected by comparing serum and AlbuMAX after 30 days of culture. Each line is one comparison. Grey shadows indicate boundaries of the merged 95% confidential intervals (CIs) for each QTL.
Figure 6Outcome of competition between 3D7 and 3D7Δ under different culture conditions. (A) Design of qPCR primers. Top, structure of the 3D7 EBA-140 gene locus; bottom, disrupted EBA-140 gene locus in 3D7Δ. The recombinant plasmid pHH1ΔEBA-140 (sequence shown inside the square brackets, was integrated into the EBA-140 gene during the generation of 3D7Δ (Maier et al., 2003). The locations of the qPCR primers are labeled with red arrows. Amplicon p1 (arrows indicate forward and reverse primers) is located at the 3’ end of the EBA-140 gene and amplifies DNA from both 3D7 and 3D7Δ. Amplicon p2 was designed to cover the junction between the human dihydrofolate reductase gene (hDHFR) (orange box) and a short upstream sequence within the pHH1ΔEBA140 plasmid and can only be amplified from 3D7Δ. (B) The proportion of 3D7Δ over eight parasite asexual cycles. (C) Selection coefficients (s) of 3D7Δ with 1× standard error. Positive values of s indicate a disadvantage to 3D7Δ. Culture conditions: Ser:Alb culture media contains both serum and AlbuMAX in a 50:50 ratio.