Literature DB >> 3570803

Environmental radiation and cancer in India.

K S Nambi, S D Soman.   

Abstract

The hormesis hypothesis, which suggests that ecologically realistic low levels of ionising radiations may be beneficial to humans, seems to be substantiated significantly by the data available on cancer incidence/mortality rates and environmental radiation levels in various cities and states of India. Where the radiation level is greater, cancer risk is invariably less. The annual cancer incidence rate (per 100,000 population) seems to decrease by 0.03/microSv increase in the external background radiation dose from a hypothetical incidence level of 79 per 100,000 corresponding to "zero environmental radiation".

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3570803     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-198705000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  21 in total

1.  Whole body imaging in the diagnosis of blunt trauma, ionizing radiation hazards and residual risk.

Authors:  J P Kepros; R C Opreanu; R Samaraweera; A Briningstool; C A Morrison; B D Mosher; P Schneider; P Stevens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  [Danger of radiation--a realistic view].

Authors:  F Wachsmann
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1989-02

3.  Association between Local External Gamma Rays and Frequency of Cancer in Babol-Iran.

Authors:  Ali Shabestani Monfared; Karimollah Hajian; Reza Hosseini; Akbar Nasir
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Radiation hormesis - fact or fiction?

Authors:  R Piispanen
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 7.  Hormesis: are low doses of ionizing radiation harmful or beneficial?

Authors:  K E van Wyngaarden; E K Pauwels
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-05

Review 8.  SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT.

Authors:  Sandra S Halliburton; Suhny Abbara; Marcus Y Chen; Ralph Gentry; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Gilbert L Raff; Leslee J Shaw; Jörg Hausleiter
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug

Review 9.  Anti-inflammatory effects of low-dose radiotherapy. Indications, dose, and radiobiological mechanisms involved.

Authors:  M Arenas; S Sabater; V Hernández; A Rovirosa; P C Lara; A Biete; J Panés
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.