Literature DB >> 35707440

Controlling the error probabilities of model selection information criteria using bootstrapping.

Michael Cullan1, Scott Lidgard2, Beckett Sterner3.   

Abstract

The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and related information criteria are powerful and increasingly popular tools for comparing multiple, non-nested models without the specification of a null model. However, existing procedures for information-theoretic model selection do not provide explicit and uniform control over error rates for the choice between models, a key feature of classical hypothesis testing. We show how to extend notions of Type-I and Type-II error to more than two models without requiring a null. We then present the Error Control for Information Criteria (ECIC) method, a bootstrap approach to controlling Type-I error using Difference of Goodness of Fit (DGOF) distributions. We apply ECIC to empirical and simulated data in time series and regression contexts to illustrate its value for parametric Neyman-Pearson classification. An R package implementing the bootstrap method is publicly available.
© 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Error statistics; Neyman–Pearson classification; bootstrap; hypothesis testing; non-nested models

Year:  2019        PMID: 35707440      PMCID: PMC9041880          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2019.1701636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.416


  10 in total

1.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights.

Authors:  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Simon Farrell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

2.  Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests.

Authors:  David Posada; Thomas R Buckley
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  The relative importance of directional change, random walks, and stasis in the evolution of fossil lineages.

Authors:  Gene Hunt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Simple versus complex models of trait evolution and stasis as a response to environmental change.

Authors:  Gene Hunt; Melanie J Hopkins; Scott Lidgard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolutionary mode routinely varies among morphological traits within fossil species lineages.

Authors:  Melanie J Hopkins; Scott Lidgard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC.

Authors:  Ken Aho; DeWayne Derryberry; Teri Peterson
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Significance Testing Needs a Taxonomy: Or How the Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Controversy Resulted in the Inferential Tail Wagging the Measurement Dog.

Authors:  Michael T Bradley; Andrew Brand
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  2016-08-08

8.  Estimation and Accuracy after Model Selection.

Authors:  Bradley Efron
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Discrimination between regression models to determine the pattern of enzyme synthesis in synchronous cell cultures.

Authors:  D A Williams
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Model Adequacy and Microevolutionary Explanations for Stasis in the Fossil Record.

Authors:  Kjetil Lysne Voje; Jostein Starrfelt; Lee Hsiang Liow
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.926

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.