| Literature DB >> 35706439 |
Ramesh Akshiitha J1, Ganesan Gopinath2, Moorthy Divya1, Natarajan Paarthipan3.
Abstract
Introduction Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) describes a neurological deficit related to the spinal cord due to the changes in the facet joints and discs of the cervical spine as a result of degeneration. Diagnosis is mainly dependent on imaging. Diffusion tensor tractography (DTT), being a non-invasive technique, shows better sensitivity when compared to the conventional T2WI sequence in the early detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). The objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in predicting high T2 signals in CSM. Methods A prospective observational study was done on 47 subjects aged between 25 and 70 years, referred to the department of radiology with clinical and imaging evidence of CSM in a tertiary care institute in Chennai. Nurick classification system was used to assess severity clinically. Diffusion-weighted imaging and DTT were done with 1.5 Tesla MRI. The primary outcome variable was a high T2 signal. Mean fractional anisotropy (FA) at the stenotic level and ADC value at a stenotic level were considered explanatory variables. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and diagnostic accuracy of the screening test with the decided cut-off values along with their 95% CI were presented. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS version 22 (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York) was used for statistical analysis. Results The mean age was 48.26 ± 10.28 years. The majority (72.34%) were males, the majority (42.55%) had a Nurick score of two, and 25.53% had a Nurick score of one. Twenty-six (55.32%) reported a high T2 signal, 36 (76.60%) had elevated ADC, and 11 (23.40 %) had no elevated ADC. There was a statistically significant difference in mean FA and ADC values across groups categorized as non-stenotic level and stenotic level (p-value <0.05). The ADC value had a moderately high sensitivity (76.92%) and low specificity (23.81%) in predicting high T2 signals with a diagnostic accuracy of 53.19%. Conclusion DTI parameters at stenotic level (ADC and FA values) in patients with cervical spondylosis help in the early detection of cervical cord compressive myelopathy prior to the appearance of T2 signal changes in conventional MRI, thereby improving clinical outcome and patient management.Entities:
Keywords: cervical spondylosis; diffusion tensor tractography (dtt); diffusion-weighted imaging (dwi); magnetic resonance imaging (mri); spondylotic myelopathy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35706439 PMCID: PMC9187187 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25778
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Summary of baseline parameters
ADC - apparent diffusion coefficient, FA - fractional anisotropy
| Parameters | Summary |
| Age | 48.26 ± 10 .28 (range 25 to 68) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 34 (72.34%) |
| Female | 13 (27.66%) |
| Nurick score | |
| 1 | 12 (25.53%) |
| 2 | 20 (42.55%) |
| 3 | 8 (17.02%) |
| 4 | 5 (10.64%) |
| 5 | 2 (4.26%) |
| High T2 signal | 26 (55.32) |
| Elevated ADC | |
| Elevated ADC (Stenotic > non-stenotic) | 36 (76.60%) |
| No elevated ADC (Stenotic value ≤ non-stenotic level) | 11 (23.40%) |
| FA value at stenotic level (decreased) | 47 (100%) |
Figure 1T2 sagittal image showing spondylosis at the C4-5 level with normal T2 cord signals
Figure 2DTI Image showing spinal cord fiber
DTI - diffusion tensor imaging
Figure 3DTI fusion image showing decreased FA and increased ADC values at the C4-5 stenotic level (fiber 1) when compared to other levels
DTI - diffusion tensor imaging, FA - fractional anisotropy, ADC - apparent diffusion coefficient
Comparison of mean of FA and ADC value between non-stenotic level and stenotic level (N=47)
FA - fractional anisotropy, ADC - apparent diffusion coefficient
| Non-stenotic level | Stenotic level | Mean difference | p-value | |
| Fractional anisotropy (FA) | 0.78 ± 0.05 | 0.49 ± 0.13 | 0.29 | <0.001 |
| Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) | 1.03 ± 0.14 | 1.20 ± 0.16 | 0.17 | <0.001 |
Figure 4Correlation between the Nurick score and FA at stenotic level (N= 47)
FA - fractional anisotropy
Figure 5Correlation between Nurick score and ADC at stenotic level (N=47)
ADC - apparent diffusion coefficient
Association of a high T2 signal with the Nurick score and elevated ADC of the study population (N=47)
*No statistical test was applied due to 0 subjects in the cells,
ADC - apparent diffusion coefficient
| High T2 signal | p-value | ||
| Yes | No | ||
| Nurick score | |||
| 1 | 4 (33. 33 %) | 8 (66. 67%) | * |
| 2 | 12 (60 %) | 8 (40%) | |
| 3 | 4 (50 %) | 4 (50%) | |
| 4 | 4 (80 %) | 1 (20%) | |
| 5 | 2 (100 %) | 0 (0%) | |
| Yes (N= 26) | No (N=21) | ||
| ADC | |||
| Elevated ADC | 20 (76 .92%) | 16 (76.19%) | 0.953 |
| No elevated ADC | 6 (23. 08%) | 5 (23. 81%) | |
Predictive validity of ADC in predicting a high T2 signal (N=47)
ADC - apparent diffusion coefficient
| Parameter | Value | 95% CI | |
| Lower | Upper | ||
| Sensitivity | 76.92% | 56.35% | 91.03% |
| Specificity | 23.81% | 8.22% | 47.17% |
| False-positive rate | 76.19% | 52.83% | 91.78% |
| False-negative rate | 23.08% | 8.97% | 43.65% |
| Positive predictive value | 55.56% | 38.10% | 72.06% |
| Negative predictive value | 45.45% | 16.75% | 76.62% |
| Diagnostic accuracy | 53.19% | 38.08% | 67.89% |