Literature DB >> 14519868

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient and apparent diffusion tensor maps in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Ayhan Demir1, Mario Ries, Crit T W Moonen, Jean-Marc Vital, Joël Dehais, Pierre Arne, Jean-Marie Caillé, Vincent Dousset.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with cervical spondylosis and/or myelopathy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multishot echo-planar imaging sequence with calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and apparent diffusion tensor (ADT) was applied in 36 patients with symptomatic cervical spondylosis. Diffusion-weighted images read by two neuroradiologists were compared with T2-weighted fast spin-echo images read independently by three neuroradiologists with regard to clinical status (n = 36). MR findings in a selected subgroup of 20 patients whose clinical status was confirmed by electrophysiologic examination also were compared. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of both T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (ADC and ADT) were calculated and compared.
RESULTS: Patients with myelopathy had abnormal ADC (17 of 21) and ADT (15 of 19) maps with increased ADC and ADT values and decreased anisotropy. For the detection of myelopathy, diffusion-weighted ADC maps had a sensitivity of 80% (17 of 21), while T2-weighted images had a sensitivity of 61% (13 of 21). The negative predictive value was 63% (seven of 11) and 60% (12 of 20) for ADC maps and T2-weighted images, respectively. Conversely, the specificity of diffusion-weighted images (53%; seven of 13) was lower than that of T2-weighted images (92%; 12 of 13). In patients with myelopathy confirmed at electrophysiologic examination, the sensitivity of diffusion-weighted images increased to 92% (12 of 13) and the negative predictive value increased to 75% (three of four), while T2-weighted images had a 53% (seven of 13) sensitivity and a 50% (six of 12) negative predictive value.
CONCLUSION: Diffusion weighting improved the sensitivity of imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Copyright RSNA, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14519868     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2291020658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  71 in total

1.  Diffusivity of intraorbital lymphoma vs. inflammation: comparison of single shot turbo spin echo and multishot echo planar imaging techniques.

Authors:  Akio Hiwatashi; Osamu Togao; Koji Yamashita; Kazufumi Kikuchi; Ryotaro Kamei; Hiroshi Yoshikawa; Atsushi Takemura; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  Ting Song; Wen-Jun Chen; Bo Yang; Hong-Pu Zhao; Jian-Wei Huang; Ming-Jin Cai; Tian-Fa Dong; Tang-Sheng Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Jean-François Budzik; Vincent Balbi; Vianney Le Thuc; Alain Duhamel; Richard Assaker; Anne Cotten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Application of diffusion tensor imaging for the diagnosis of segmental level of dysfunction in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Y Suetomi; T Kanchiku; S Nishijima; Y Imajo; H Suzuki; Y Yoshida; N Nishida; T Taguchi
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography in cervical compressive myelopathy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Joon Woo Lee; Jae Hyoung Kim; Jong Bin Park; Kun Woo Park; Jin S Yeom; Guen Young Lee; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Examination of spinal cord tissue architecture with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Stephan E Maier
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the neurologically intact human spinal cord.

Authors:  B M Ellingson; J L Ulmer; S N Kurpad; B D Schmit
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Usefulness of diffusion tensor MR imaging in the assessment of intramedullary changes of the cervical spinal cord in different stages of degenerative spine disease.

Authors:  Anna Banaszek; Joanna Bladowska; Paweł Szewczyk; Przemysław Podgórski; Marek Sąsiadek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  [Cervical myelopathy as a complication of rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  A C Arlt; J Steinmetz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 10.  Imaging techniques in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Noriko Salamon; Langston T Holly
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 2.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.