Literature DB >> 10085263

Hearing with the mouthparts: behavioural responses and the structural basis of ultrasound perception in acherontiine hawkmoths

.   

Abstract

In contrast to previous assumptions, mouthparts form hearing organs not only in choerocampine hawkmoths but also in some distantly related acherontiine hawkmoth species. Four of the six acherontiine species studied revealed responses to ultrasonic sounds when stimulated during tethered flight. The responses included changes in flight speed and non-directional turns. Individuals from two species also responded by emitting sound. The minimum thresholds of the flight pattern changes were approximately 70 dB in all species studied, with species-specific best frequencies between 30 and 70 kHz. Some acherontiine species also move their tongue in a stereotyped way when stimulated acoustically. The activity of the muscles involved in this tongue reflex was characterized in the present study and used in combination with ablation experiments to localize the hearing organ. These experiments revealed auditory functions of the labial palps and the labral pilifers similar to those found in Choerocampina. The palp contributes a 20-25 dB rise in sensitivity, whereas the pilifer appears to contain the sensory organ. Structural differences suggest a convergent evolution of hearing in hawkmoths: in the place of the swollen palps of Choerocampina, acherontiine species capable of hearing possess a scale-plate of the palps that interacts with an articulating pilifer, while this modification is absent in closely related non-hearing species.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10085263     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202.8.909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  Tympanal and atympanal 'mouth-ears' in hawkmoths (Sphingidae).

Authors:  Martin C Göpfert; Annemarie Surlykke; Lutz T Wasserthal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Hawkmoths produce anti-bat ultrasound.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Convergent evolution of anti-bat sounds.

Authors:  Aaron J Corcoran; Nickolay I Hristov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Tempo and mode of antibat ultrasound production and sonar jamming in the diverse hawkmoth radiation.

Authors:  Akito Y Kawahara; Jesse R Barber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Sensory ecology of predator-prey interactions: responses of the AN2 interneuron in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus to the echolocation calls of sympatric bats.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; Cassandra Guignion
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; David Plotkin; Juliette J Rubin; Nicholas T Homziak; Brian C Leavell; Peter R Houlihan; Krystie A Miner; Jesse W Breinholt; Brandt Quirk-Royal; Pablo Sebastián Padrón; Matias Nunez; Akito Y Kawahara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Neuroethology of ultrasonic hearing in nocturnal butterflies (Hedyloidea).

Authors:  Jayne E Yack; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Annemarie Surlykke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 2.389

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.