Literature DB >> 35703052

Mechanical compensation in the evolution of the early hominin feeding apparatus.

Justin A Ledogar1, Sascha Senck2, Brian A Villmoare3, Amanda L Smith4, Gerhard W Weber5,6, Brian G Richmond7, Paul C Dechow8, Callum F Ross9, Ian R Grosse10, Barth W Wright11, Qian Wang8, Craig Byron12, Stefano Benazzi13, Kristian J Carlson14,15, Keely B Carlson16, Leslie C Pryor McIntosh17, Adam van Casteren18, David S Strait19,20.   

Abstract

Australopiths, a group of hominins from the Plio-Pleistocene of Africa, are characterized by derived traits in their crania hypothesized to strengthen the facial skeleton against feeding loads and increase the efficiency of bite force production. The crania of robust australopiths are further thought to be stronger and more efficient than those of gracile australopiths. Results of prior mechanical analyses have been broadly consistent with this hypothesis, but here we show that the predictions of the hypothesis with respect to mechanical strength are not met: some gracile australopith crania are as strong as that of a robust australopith, and the strength of gracile australopith crania overlaps substantially with that of chimpanzee crania. We hypothesize that the evolution of cranial traits that increased the efficiency of bite force production in australopiths may have simultaneously weakened the face, leading to the compensatory evolution of additional traits that reinforced the facial skeleton. The evolution of facial form in early hominins can therefore be thought of as an interplay between the need to increase the efficiency of bite force production and the need to maintain the structural integrity of the face.

Entities:  

Keywords:  australopith; diet; finiteelement analysis; ingestion; mastication

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35703052      PMCID: PMC9198777          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  52 in total

1.  New model to explain tooth wear with implications for microwear formation and diet reconstruction.

Authors:  Jing Xia; Jing Zheng; Diaodiao Huang; Z Ryan Tian; Lei Chen; Zhongrong Zhou; Peter S Ungar; Linmao Qian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Inferring hominoid and early hominid phylogeny using craniodental characters: the role of fossil taxa.

Authors:  David S Strait; Frederick E Grine
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.895

3.  Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania.

Authors:  Philipp Gunz; Philipp Mitteroecker; Simon Neubauer; Gerhard W Weber; Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.895

4.  The Biomechanics of Bony Facial "Buttresses" in South African Australopiths: An Experimental Study Using Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Justin A Ledogar; Stefano Benazzi; Amanda L Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Keely B Carlson; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Kristian J Carlson; Darryl J De Ruiter; Leslie C Pryor Mcintosh; David S Strait
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Selection for mechanical advantage underlies multiple cranial optima in new world leaf-nosed bats.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Dumont; Krishna Samadevam; Ian Grosse; Omar M Warsi; Brandon Baird; Liliana M Davalos
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  The role of food stiffness in dental microwear feature formation.

Authors:  David J Daegling; Li-Cheng Hua; Peter S Ungar
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.633

7.  Untangling the environmental from the dietary: dust does not matter.

Authors:  Gildas Merceron; Anusha Ramdarshan; Cécile Blondel; Jean-Renaud Boisserie; Noël Brunetiere; Arthur Francisco; Denis Gautier; Xavier Milhet; Alice Novello; Dimitri Pret
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The dental microwear of hard-object feeding in laboratory Sapajus apella and its implications for dental microwear formation.

Authors:  Mark F Teaford; Peter S Ungar; Andrea B Taylor; Callum F Ross; Christopher J Vinyard
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  Masticatory-stress hypotheses and the supraorbital region of primates.

Authors:  W L Hylander; P G Picq; K R Johnson
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Mechanical evidence that Australopithecus sediba was limited in its ability to eat hard foods.

Authors:  Justin A Ledogar; Amanda L Smith; Stefano Benazzi; Gerhard W Weber; Mark A Spencer; Keely B Carlson; Kieran P McNulty; Paul C Dechow; Ian R Grosse; Callum F Ross; Brian G Richmond; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Kristian J Carlson; Darryl J de Ruiter; Lee R Berger; Kelli Tamvada; Leslie C Pryor; Michael A Berthaume; David S Strait
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Mechanical compensation in the evolution of the early hominin feeding apparatus.

Authors:  Justin A Ledogar; Sascha Senck; Brian A Villmoare; Amanda L Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Brian G Richmond; Paul C Dechow; Callum F Ross; Ian R Grosse; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Stefano Benazzi; Kristian J Carlson; Keely B Carlson; Leslie C Pryor McIntosh; Adam van Casteren; David S Strait
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.530

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.