Literature DB >> 28000396

The Biomechanics of Bony Facial "Buttresses" in South African Australopiths: An Experimental Study Using Finite Element Analysis.

Justin A Ledogar1,2, Stefano Benazzi3,4, Amanda L Smith2,5, Gerhard W Weber6, Keely B Carlson7, Paul C Dechow8, Ian R Grosse9, Callum F Ross10, Brian G Richmond4,11, Barth W Wright12, Qian Wang8, Craig Byron13, Kristian J Carlson14,15, Darryl J De Ruiter7,15, Leslie C Pryor Mcintosh8, David S Strait2,5.   

Abstract

Australopiths exhibit a number of derived facial features that are thought to strengthen the face against high and/or repetitive loads associated with a diet that included mechanically challenging foods. Here, we use finite element analysis (FEA) to test hypotheses related to the purported strengthening role of the zygomatic root and "anterior pillar" in australopiths. We modified our previously constructed models of Sts 5 (Australopithecus africanus) and MH1 (A. sediba) to differ in the morphology of the zygomatic root, including changes to both the shape and positioning of the zygomatic root complex, in addition to creating variants of Sts 5 lacking anterior pillars. We found that both an expanded zygomatic root and the presence of "anterior pillars" reinforce the face against feeding loads. We also found that strain orientations are most compatible with the hypothesis that the pillar evolved to resist loads associated with premolar loading, and that this morphology has an ancillary effect of strengthening the face during all loading regimes. These results provide support for the functional hypotheses. However, we found that an anteriorly positioned zygomatic root increases strain magnitudes even in models with an inflated/reinforced root complex. These results suggest that an anteriorly placed zygomatic root complex evolved to enhance the efficiency of bite force production while facial reinforcement features, such as the anterior pillar and the expanded zygomatic root, may have been selected for in part to compensate for the weakening effect of this facial configuration. Anat Rec, 300:171-195, 2017.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  evolution; function; zygoma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28000396     DOI: 10.1002/ar.23492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  7 in total

1.  The cranial biomechanics and feeding performance of Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  Rebecca W Cook; Antonino Vazzana; Rita Sorrentino; Stefano Benazzi; Amanda L Smith; David S Strait; Justin A Ledogar
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Mechanical compensation in the evolution of the early hominin feeding apparatus.

Authors:  Justin A Ledogar; Sascha Senck; Brian A Villmoare; Amanda L Smith; Gerhard W Weber; Brian G Richmond; Paul C Dechow; Callum F Ross; Ian R Grosse; Barth W Wright; Qian Wang; Craig Byron; Stefano Benazzi; Kristian J Carlson; Keely B Carlson; Leslie C Pryor McIntosh; Adam van Casteren; David S Strait
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  The effects of femoral metaphyseal morphology on growth plate biomechanics in juvenile chimpanzees and humans.

Authors:  Peter A Stamos; Michael A Berthaume
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.661

4.  Computer simulations show that Neanderthal facial morphology represents adaptation to cold and high energy demands, but not heavy biting.

Authors:  Stephen Wroe; William C H Parr; Justin A Ledogar; Jason Bourke; Samuel P Evans; Luca Fiorenza; Stefano Benazzi; Jean-Jacques Hublin; Chris Stringer; Ottmar Kullmer; Michael Curry; Todd C Rae; Todd R Yokley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Biting mechanics and niche separation in a specialized clade of primate seed predators.

Authors:  Justin A Ledogar; Theodora H Y Luk; Jonathan M G Perry; Dimitri Neaux; Stephen Wroe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evidence that metallic proxies are unsuitable for assessing the mechanics of microwear formation and a new theory of the meaning of microwear.

Authors:  Adam van Casteren; Peter W Lucas; David S Strait; Shaji Michael; Nick Bierwisch; Norbert Schwarzer; Khaled J Al-Fadhalah; Abdulwahab S Almusallam; Lidia A Thai; Sreeja Saji; Ali Shekeban; Michael V Swain
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  The anatomy of a crushing bite: The specialised cranial mechanics of a giant extinct kangaroo.

Authors:  D Rex Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.