| Literature DB >> 35701845 |
Zelei Miao1,2, Ju-Sheng Zheng3,4,5, Huijun Wang6,7, Wenwen Du8,9, Congmei Xiao1,2,10, Chang Su8,9, Wanglong Gou1,2,10, Luqi Shen2,10,11, Jiguo Zhang8,9, Yuanqing Fu2,10,11, Zengliang Jiang2,10,11, Zhihong Wang8,9, Xiaofang Jia8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The interplay among the plant-based dietary pattern, gut microbiota, and cardiometabolic health is still unclear, and evidence from large prospective cohorts is rare. We aimed to examine the association of long-term and short-term plant-based dietary patterns with gut microbiota and to assess the prospective association of the identified microbial features with cardiometabolic biomarkers.Entities:
Keywords: 3-day 24-h dietary recalls; Cardiometabolic health; Food frequency questionnaire; Gut microbiota; Plant-based dietary pattern; Prospective cohort
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35701845 PMCID: PMC9199182 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02402-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 11.150
Fig. 1Overview of the study and analysis workflow. This study profiled the gut microbiome of 3096 participants from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) via 16S rRNA sequencing. The CHNS has repeatedly collected dietary information using 24-h dietary recalls for three consecutive days and validated food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) in 2011 and 2015. We associated gut microbial diversity, taxonomies, and pathways with long-term plant-based dietary pattern and short-term plant-based dietary pattern, respectively. We further investigated the prospective associations between the identified gut microbiome signatures and cardiometabolic biomarkers assessed in 2018. We compared the results obtained from long-term plant-based dietary pattern and short-term plant-based dietary pattern
Characteristics of participants during stool sample collection by quintiles of plant-based diet indexa
| Long-term PDI (N = 3096) | Short-term PDI (N = 3066) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (N = 737) | Q3 (N = 506) | Q5 (N = 596) | Q1 (N = 638) | Q3 (N = 665) | Q5 (N = 520) | |
| Age (year) | 52.0 (11.4) | 52.1 (13.1) | 50.5 (13.1) | 50.3 (11.6) | 51.0 (12.2) | 53.9 (13.1) |
| Sex, % of women | 329 (45%) | 267 (53%) | 353 (59%) | 231 (36%) | 357 (54%) | 334 (64%) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.9 (3.5) | 24.2 (3.5) | 24.5 (3.7) | 23.9 (3.4) | 23.8 (3.5) | 24.6 (3.7) |
| Education level | ||||||
| Middle school or lower | 506 (69%) | 328 (65%) | 398 (67%) | 384 (60%) | 423 (64%) | 383 (74%) |
| High school or professional college | 151 (20%) | 112 (22%) | 122 (20%) | 172 (27%) | 150 (23%) | 89 (17%) |
| University | 80 (11%) | 66 (13%) | 76 (13%) | 82 (13%) | 92 (14%) | 48 ( 9%) |
| Current smoking | 256 (35%) | 116 (23%) | 149 (25%) | 245 (38%) | 175 (26%) | 101 (19%) |
| Current alcohol drinking | 251 (34%) | 128 (25%) | 161 (27%) | 249 (39%) | 182 (27%) | 111 (21%) |
| Physical activity (MET•hours/week) | 152.3 (155.0) | 136.3 (135.0) | 156.7 (158.3) | 148.7 (145.6) | 149.0 (159.2) | 141.1 (142.6) |
| Total energy intake (kcal/day) | 2186 (1190) | 2183 (3475) | 2174 (2441) | 2585 (611) | 1906 (533) | 1404 (454) |
| Urbanizationb | ||||||
| Low | 243 (33%) | 156 (31%) | 238 (40%) | 170 (27%) | 217 (33%) | 245 (47%) |
| Middle | 256 (35%) | 183 (36%) | 186 (31%) | 241 (38%) | 216 (32%) | 140 (27%) |
| High | 238 (32%) | 167 (33%) | 172 (29%) | 227 (36%) | 232 (35%) | 135 (26%) |
| Prevalent hypertension | 86 (12%) | 77 (15%) | 93 (16%) | 74 (12%) | 82 (12%) | 97 (19%) |
| Hypertension medicine use | 69 (9%) | 65 (13%) | 76 (13%) | 61 (10%) | 69 (10%) | 77 (15%) |
| Prevalent type 2 diabetes | 78 (11%) | 67 (13%) | 67 (11%) | 73 (11%) | 73 (11%) | 66 (13%) |
| Type 2 diabetes medicine use | 14 (2%) | 18 (4%) | 14 (2%) | 13 (2%) | 16 (2%) | 15 (3%) |
| Fasting glucose (mmol/L) | 5.6 (1.6) | 5.6 (1.8) | 5.4 (1.3) | 5.6 (1.8) | 5.5 (1.4) | 5.4 (1.4) |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.7 (1.0) | 5.8 (1.1) | 5.7 (0.9) | 5.8 (1.1) | 5.7 (0.8) | 5.8 (1.0) |
| Fasting insulin (μU/mL) | 7.8 (7.8) | 7.7 (6.9) | 7.5 (6.5) | 7.9 (8.8) | 7.8 (7.9) | 7.8 (6.9) |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.3 (0.3) | 1.3 (0.4) | 1.3 (0.3) | 1.3 (0.3) | 1.3 (0.3) | 1.3 (0.3) |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 3.3 (0.9) | 3.2 (0.9) | 3.0 (0.9) | 3.3 (1.0) | 3.2 (0.9) | 3.1 (0.9) |
| TC (mmol/L) | 5.1 (1.0) | 5.0 (1.1) | 4.7 (1.0) | 5.1 (1.1) | 4.9 (1.0) | 4.8 (1.0) |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.6 (1.2) | 1.6 (1.2) | 1.5 (1.0) | 1.7 (1.2) | 1.6 (1.0) | 1.5 (1.1) |
| CRP (mg/L) | 1.8 (3.5) | 2.1 (3.7) | 1.6 (3.0) | 1.9 (3.6) | 1.7 (2.7) | 2.1 (4.2) |
| Current tea drinkingc | 343 (47%) | 239 (47%) | 238 (40%) | 331 (52%) | 308 (46%) | 182 (35%) |
| Current coffee drinkingc | 55 (7%) | 20 (4%) | 65 (11%) | 66 (10%) | 59 ( 9%) | 23 ( 4%) |
| hPDI | 40.4 (5.0) | 45.1 (5.0) | 50.4 (4.7) | 41.3 (4.1) | 45.2 (4.2) | 48.6 (3.7) |
| uPDI | 47.1 (7.3) | 44.7 (7.7) | 43.3 (6.9) | 46.0 (6.4) | 44.6 (5.4) | 44.8 (3.9) |
| Whole grains, servings/day | 0.2 (0.7) | 0.3 (1.0) | 0.4 (0.6) | 0.3 (0.9) | 0.5 (0.9) | 0.6 (1.1) |
| Fruits, servings/day | 0.6 (0.6) | 1.1 (1.3) | 1.4 (1.2) | 0.3 (0.6) | 0.4 (0.7) | 0.5 (0.7) |
| Vegetables, servings/day | 2.6 (2.0) | 3.0 (2.2) | 3.5 (4.0) | 2.7 (1.3) | 2.8 (1.4) | 3.3 (1.6) |
| Nuts, servings/day | 0.5 (1.1) | 0.9 (1.4) | 1.4 (1.9) | 3.1 (10.3) | 3.7 (11.0) | 3.4 (10.4) |
| Legumes, servings/day | 0.9 (1.8) | 1.1 (0.9) | 1.8 (7.4) | 0.6 (0.9) | 0.6 (0.9) | 0.9 (1.0) |
| Potatoes, servings/day | 0.2 (0.3) | 0.4 (0.6) | 0.7 (0.6) | 0.2 (0.4) | 0.3 (0.4) | 0.5 (0.6) |
| Vegetable oils, servings/day | 2.2 (2.1) | 3.0 (2.9) | 3.1 (1.9) | 1.4 (2.5) | 1.8 (2.2) | 2.3 (2.5) |
| Refined grains, servings/day | 7.0 (2.3) | 6.8 (4.5) | 6.3 (2.3) | 6.9 (2.7) | 7.2 (2.9) | 8.6 (3.0) |
| Beverages and fruit juices, servings/day | 0.4 (1.2) | 0.8 (1.9) | 1.5 (5.9) | 0.1 (0.5) | 0.2 (2.1) | 0.2 (1.4) |
| Sweets and desserts, servings/day | 0.3 (0.5) | 0.5 (0.7) | 0.7 (0.9) | 0.4 (1.7) | 0.6 (1.7) | 0.5 (1.2) |
| Dairy, servings/day | 0.4 (0.9) | 0.4 (0.7) | 0.3 (0.7) | 0.1 (0.3) | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.0 (0.1) |
| Eggs, servings/day | 0.7 (0.5) | 0.7 (0.6) | 0.6 (0.6) | 0.7 (0.6) | 0.5 (0.5) | 0.4 (0.5) |
| Fish or seafood, servings/day | 0.8 (3.3) | 0.5 (0.8) | 0.4 (0.6) | 0.8 (1.2) | 0.5 (0.8) | 0.2 (0.5) |
| Meat, servings/day | 2.5 (1.6) | 1.9 (1.2) | 1.3 (0.9) | 2.7 (1.6) | 2.3 (1.6) | 1.3 (1.5) |
| Animal oils, servings/day | 0.8 (1.4) | 0.4 (0.7) | 0.2 (0.4) | 1.0 (2.2) | 0.5 (1.2) | 0.3 (0.7) |
Abbreviations: BMI Body mass index, CRP High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, HDL-C High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hPDI Healthy plant-based diet index, LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, PDI Plant-based diet index, Q Quintile, TC Total cholesterol, TG Total triglycerides, SD Standard deviation, uPDI unhealthy plant-based diet index
aData are presented as mean (SD) for continuous measures, and n (%) for categorical measures. Plant-based dietary index, dietary intakes and total energy presented were calculated based on the FFQs, and 3-day 24-h dietary recalls for long-term diet and short-term diet, respectively. Dietary intake for each food group was adjusted for total energy intake using the residual method
bUrbanization index, a 12-component scale based on community-level physical, social, cultural, and economic environments, was categorized as low (≤ 63), middle (63–84.3), and high (> 84.3) levels of urbanization
cCurrent tea and coffee drinking status were estimated based on the FFQ information
Fig. 2Associations of the long-term and short-term plant-based dietary patterns with overall gut microbiome configuration. A Long-term plant-based dietary pattern and its constituent food groups were correlated with short-term estimates. The red-to-blue gradient in the outer blocks represents the magnitude and direction of the Spearman correlation between long-term dietary factors and short-term dietary factors. The correlations were displayed with color within blocks when significant (p < 0.05). B Associations of long-term and short-term plant-based dietary patterns with bacterial richness and diversity. Beta coefficients were derived from multivariable-adjusted linear mixed models for Q2–Q5 of PDIs using Q1 as the reference group. Covariates included age, sex, BMI, total energy intake, physical activity, education, smoking and alcohol drinking status, habitual tea and coffee consumption, urbanization index, sampling location (random effect), sequencing depth, and sequencing batch (random effect). All four alpha-diversity indices were standardized to Z-score values before statistical analysis. C Associations of plant-based foods and animal-based foods with bacterial richness and diversity. Beta coefficients were derived from multivariable-adjusted linear mixed models as above for Q5 of each food group using Q1 as the reference group. All four alpha-diversity indices were standardized to Z-score values before statistical analysis. Non-significant associations (p > 0.05) have been scored 0 and hence colored white. D Proportion of variation in taxonomy at ASV level explained by the long-term and short-term plant-based dietary patterns and as quantified by permutational multivariate analysis of variance (based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity). The p values were calculated by adjusting for the same covariates as above. Faith’s PD, Faith’s phylogenetic diversity; hPDI, healthful plant-based diet index; PDI, plant-based diet index; Pielou’s evenness, Pielou’s measure of species evenness; Q, quintile; Shannon, Shannon’s diversity index; uPDI, unhealthful plant-based diet index. *** p < 0.001
Fig. 3Distinct gut microbial signatures between long-term and short-term plant-based dietary patterns. A Association of long-term and short-term PDI with Firmicutes. Beta values were calculated for Q2-Q5 of the PDI using Q1 as the reference group using linear mixed models. All models used sampling location as a random effect and simultaneously adjusted for age, sex, BMI, total energy intake, physical activity, education, smoking and alcohol drinking status, habitual tea and coffee consumption, and urbanization index. The p-value for trend was calculated based on per quintile difference in the corresponding plant-based diet index. The relative abundance of microbial taxonomy was transformed using rank-based inverse normal transformation before analysis. B The number of nominally significant taxonomic associations observed in genus and ASV level with long-term and short-term plant-based dietary patterns (Q5 vs. Q1 p<0.05). The bars with stripes represent those significant after FDR adjustment (q<0.25). C Associations of long-term and short-term plant-based dietary patterns and its constituent food groups with microbial genera with the asterisks denoting significant associations (FDR q < 0.25). Beta coefficients were derived from multivariable-adjusted linear mixed models as above for Q5 of each dietary indicator using Q1 as the reference group. The relative abundance of microbial taxonomy was transformed using rank-based inverse normal transformation before analysis. Microbial genera with no significant associations are not shown. The number of each microbe’s associations with dietary indicators is written within cells when significant. FDR, false discovery rate; hPDI, healthful plant-based diet index; PDI, plant-based diet index; Q, quintile; uPDI, unhealthful plant-based diet index. *FDR q < 0.25, ** FDR q < 0.05
Fig. 4Association of the gut microbial signatures related to plant-based dietary patterns with cardiometabolic biomarkers. The Sankey chart on the left shows the significant microbial signatures of long-term and short-term plant-based dietary pattern and its constituent food groups. The heatmap in the right shows the association between microbial signatures identified and cardiometabolic biomarkers measured after 3 years. Beta coefficients were derived from the linear regression model, adjusted for baseline age, sex, and corresponding cardiometabolic biomarkers measured in 2015 and expressed as the difference in cardiometabolic biomarkers (in standard deviation unit). Correction for multiple testing (FDR) was applied. CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; FDR, false discovery rate; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hPDI, healthful plant-based diet index; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PDI, plant-based diet index; Q, quintile; TC, total cholesterol; TG, total triglycerides; uPDI, unhealthful plant-based diet index. * FDR q < 0.25, ** FDR q < 0.05
Overview of diet-microbiome associations in the present study
| Findings in the present study | Previous studies | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Dietary factorsa | Associations with diet and health | References |
| Long-term animal oil intake ( −) | SCFA-producing bacteria; decrease with an increasing protein/fat in diet; negative association with IL-2 and C-reactive protein | [ | |
| Long-term uPDI ( −) | SCFA-producing bacteria; inverse association with liver total triglycerides; lower in women who developed gestational diabetes | [ | |
| Short-term hPDI ( +) | SCFA-producing bacteria; increased after high-fiber diet; linked with healthier eating behavior; negative association with visceral fat, Hb1Ac and inflammation | [ | |
| Short-term PDI ( −) | Increase with high-fat diet; decrease with flavonoids intake; enriched in acute coronary syndrome patients; potentially contribute to the inflammation; associated with host lipid metabolism | [ | |
| Short-term hPDI ( −) | SCFA-producing bacteria; correlated with vegetal protein; higher in patients with irritable bowel syndrome | [ | |
| Long-term nuts intake ( −) | No related information found | ||
Long-term uPDI ( +) Long-term legumes ( −) | Involved in the starch hydrolysis | [ | |
| Long-term uPDI ( +) | Enriched in children with dental caries; increased abundance in bacterial infection and asthma | [ | |
| Long-term animal oil intake ( −) | Involved in ellagic acid metabolism and help produce anti-inflammatory metabolite isolecithine-A | [ | |
| Long-term PDI ( −) | Involved in tryptophan metabolism; linked with inflammation | ||
Short-term hPDI ( +) Short-term uPDI ( −) | SCFA-producing bacteria; potentially make up for disorders in glycogenolysis; enriched in healthy athletes | [ | |
| Short-term hPDI ( +) | SCFA-producing bacteria; involved in amino acid metabolism | ||
| Long-term refined grains intake ( +) | Opportunistic pathogen; could degrade carbon sources (e.g., glucose, cellobiose, and xylose) | [ | |
| Short-term uPDI ( +) | Enriched in the fish fed in the paddy field | [ |
a( +) positive association; ( −) inverse association