Literature DB >> 28140320

Alignment of Healthy Dietary Patterns and Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Review.

Miriam E Nelson1,2, Michael W Hamm3, Frank B Hu4, Steven A Abrams5, Timothy S Griffin2.   

Abstract

To support food security for current and future generations, there is a need to understand the relation between sustainable diets and the health of a population. In recent years, a number of studies have investigated and compared different dietary patterns to better understand which foods and eating patterns have less of an environmental impact while meeting nutritional needs and promoting health. This systematic review (SR) of population-level dietary patterns and food sustainability extends and updates the SR that was conducted by the 2015 US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, an expert committee commissioned by the federal government to inform dietary guidance as it relates to the committee's original conclusions. In the original SR, 15 studies met the criteria for inclusion; since then, an additional 8 studies have been identified and included. The relations between dietary intake patterns and both health and environmental outcomes were compared across studies, with methodologies that included modeling, life cycle assessment, and land use analysis. Across studies, consistent evidence indicated that a dietary pattern higher in plant-based foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, legumes, seeds, nuts, whole grains) and lower in animal-based foods (especially red meat), as well as lower in total energy, is both healthier and associated with a lesser impact on the environment. This dietary pattern differs from current average consumption patterns in the United States. Our updated SR confirms and strengthens the conclusions of the original US Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee SR, which found that adherence to several well-characterized dietary patterns, including vegetarian (with variations) diets, dietary guidelines-related diets, Mediterranean-style diets, the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, and other sustainable diet scenarios, promotes greater health and has a less negative impact on the environment than current average dietary intakes.
© 2016 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dietary guidelines; dietary patterns; food security; life cycle assessment; sustainable diets; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28140320      PMCID: PMC5105037          DOI: 10.3945/an.116.012567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  28 in total

Review 1.  Toward a life cycle-based, diet-level framework for food environmental impact and nutritional quality assessment: a critical review.

Authors:  Martin C Heller; Gregory A Keoleian; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Sustainability. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet.

Authors:  Will Steffen; Katherine Richardson; Johan Rockström; Sarah E Cornell; Ingo Fetzer; Elena M Bennett; Reinette Biggs; Stephen R Carpenter; Wim de Vries; Cynthia A de Wit; Carl Folke; Dieter Gerten; Jens Heinke; Georgina M Mace; Linn M Persson; Veerabhadran Ramanathan; Belinda Reyers; Sverker Sörlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The cost of a healthy and sustainable diet--who can afford it?

Authors:  Laurel Barosh; Sharon Friel; Katrin Engelhardt; Lilian Chan
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.939

4.  The New Nordic Diet is an effective tool in environmental protection: it reduces the associated socioeconomic cost of diets.

Authors:  Henrik Saxe
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  High nutritional quality is not associated with low greenhouse gas emissions in self-selected diets of French adults.

Authors:  Florent Vieux; Louis-Georges Soler; Djilali Touazi; Nicole Darmon
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK.

Authors:  Peter Scarborough; Paul N Appleby; Anja Mizdrak; Adam D M Briggs; Ruth C Travis; Kathryn E Bradbury; Timothy J Key
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.743

7.  Health effects of adopting low greenhouse gas emission diets in the UK.

Authors:  James Milner; Rosemary Green; Alan D Dangour; Andy Haines; Zaid Chalabi; Joseph Spadaro; Anil Markandya; Paul Wilkinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Greenhouse gas emissions and the Australian diet--comparing dietary recommendations with average intakes.

Authors:  Gilly A Hendrie; Brad G Ridoutt; Thomas O Wiedmann; Manny Noakes
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Impact of a reduced red and processed meat dietary pattern on disease risks and greenhouse gas emissions in the UK: a modelling study.

Authors:  Louise M Aston; James N Smith; John W Powles
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Environmental footprints of Mediterranean versus Western dietary patterns: beyond the health benefits of the Mediterranean diet.

Authors:  Sara Sáez-Almendros; Biel Obrador; Anna Bach-Faig; Lluis Serra-Majem
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  75 in total

1.  Diets benefiting health and climate relate to longevity in northern Sweden.

Authors:  Anna Strid; Ingegerd Johansson; Marta Bianchi; Ulf Sonesson; Elinor Hallström; Bernt Lindahl; Anna Winkvist
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  Perspective: Food-Based Dietary Guidelines in Europe-Scientific Concepts, Current Status, and Perspectives.

Authors:  Angela Bechthold; Heiner Boeing; Inge Tetens; Lukas Schwingshackl; Ute Nöthlings
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Dietary Strategies to Reduce Environmental Impact: A Critical Review of the Evidence Base.

Authors:  Bradley G Ridoutt; Gilly A Hendrie; Manny Noakes
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Animal and Plant Protein Sources and Cardiometabolic Health.

Authors:  François Mariotti
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

5.  Plant-Based Diets for Personal, Population, and Planetary Health.

Authors:  Elena C Hemler; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 6.  Climate change and malnutrition: we need to act now.

Authors:  William H Dietz
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 7.  A Perspective on the Transition to Plant-Based Diets: a Diet Change May Attenuate Climate Change, but Can It Also Attenuate Obesity and Chronic Disease Risk?

Authors:  Faidon Magkos; Inge Tetens; Susanne Gjedsted Bügel; Claus Felby; Simon Rønnow Schacht; James O Hill; Eric Ravussin; Arne Astrup
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 8.701

8.  Toward Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems.

Authors:  Adam Drewnowski; John Finley; Julie M Hess; John Ingram; Gregory Miller; Christian Peters
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2020-05-20

Review 9.  Plant-based diets and cardiovascular health.

Authors:  Ambika Satija; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 6.677

10.  Do young adults value sustainable diet practices? Continuity in values from adolescence to adulthood and linkages to dietary behaviour.

Authors:  Nicole Larson; Melissa N Laska; Dianne Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.022

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.