Literature DB >> 35700369

CORR Insights®: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Is the Most Cost-effective Treatment Strategy for Proximal Humerus Fractures in Older Adults: A Cost-utility Analysis.

David H Sohn1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2022        PMID： 35700369      PMCID： PMC9473770          DOI： 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.755


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

1.  Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty provides better shoulder function than hemiarthroplasty for displaced 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in patients aged 70 years or older: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eythor Ö Jonsson; Carl Ekholm; Björn Salomonsson; Yilmaz Demir; Per Olerud
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Measuring Value in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  Benedict U Nwachukwu; Kamran S Hamid; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2013-11-19

3.  Nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures: high incidence among outpatient-treated osteoporotic fractures and severe impact on upper extremity function and patient subjective health perception.

Authors:  Emilio Calvo; Diana Morcillo; Antonio M Foruria; Enrique Redondo-Santamaría; Fernando Osorio-Picorne; Jose R Caeiro
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Is the Most Cost-effective Treatment Strategy for Proximal Humerus Fractures in Older Adults: A Cost-utility Analysis.

Authors:  Hassaan Abdel Khalik; Brittany Humphries; Michael Zoratti; Daniel Axelrod; Colin Kruse; Bill Ristevski; Krishan Rajaratnam; Michael Gardner; Jean-Éric Tarride; Herman Johal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in elderly low-demand patients. A Markov decision analysis.

Authors:  James Slover; Birgitte Espehaug; Leif Ivar Havelin; Lars Birger Engesaeter; Ove Furnes; Ivan Tomek; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Cost-effectiveness of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion five years after surgery.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Paul A Anderson; Vincent C Traynelis; Praveen V Mummaneni; Steven D Glassman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  R W Chang; J M Pellisier; G B Hazen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment for 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yaiza Lopiz; Borja Alcobía-Díaz; María Galán-Olleros; Carlos García-Fernández; Amanda López Picado; Fernando Marco
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Cost-effectiveness of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Does indication affect outcome?

Authors:  Jamie A Nicholson; Rhiannon Jones; Deborah J MacDonald; Iain Brown; Julie McBirnie
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-01-23

10.  Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Superior to Plate Fixation at 2 Years for Displaced Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Alexander Nilsskog Fraser; Jonas Bjørdal; Tone Mehlum Wagle; Anna Cecilia Karlberg; Odd Arve Lien; Lars Eilertsen; Konrad Mader; Hilde Apold; Leif Børge Larsen; Jan Erik Madsen; Tore Fjalestad
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 6.558
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.