| Literature DB >> 35698464 |
Asako Yoritaka1, Tetsuo Hayashi1,2, Keiko Fusegi1, Rie Inami3, Nobutaka Hattori2.
Abstract
Objective: It is difficult to distinguish patients with schizophrenia with neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism (NIP) from those with existing idiopathic Parkinson's disease when their striatal dopamine transporter uptake is reduced. There is a possibility of misdiagnosis of Parkinson's disease in patients with schizophrenia as schizophrenia with NIP, which leads to inappropriate treatment. This prospective study aimed at determining the underlying pathophysiology using detailed clinical and psychological assessments.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35698464 PMCID: PMC9188471 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2727515
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parkinsons Dis ISSN: 2042-0080
Clinical findings of the enrolled patients.
| Case (sex) | 1 (female) | 2 (female) | 3 (female) | 4 (female) | 5 (male) | 6 (male) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 22 | 56 | 35 | 30 | 21 | 33 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Risperidone | 4 | — | 4 | — | — | 9 |
| Levomepromazine | 5 | — | 5 | — | — | 9 |
| Chlorpromazine | 80 | — | — | — | — | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Valproic acid | — | 500 | 600 | — | — | 1500 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Quetiapine | — | 125 | — | — | 50 | 600 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| 37 | 68 | 68 | 65 | 46 | 76 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| 5 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 2 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| 44 | 74 | 74 | 75 | 53 | 80 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| bilateral | Left | Bilateral | Bilateral | Left | Right | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| At PD diagnosis | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| Baseline | 2.5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 300 | 200 | 300 | 600 | 150 | 0 |
| End of study | 500 | 400 | 400 | 600 | 300 | 0 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | ROP-CR (12) | — | — | PRX-ER(1.13) | — | RTP (2.25) |
| End of study | ROP-CR (12) | — | — | PRX-ER(1.13) | — | RTP (2.25) |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 4 | — | 6 | — | 4 | — |
| End of study | 4 | — | 6 | — | 4 | — |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | — | ZNS (50) | Amantadine (100) | — | ZNS (50) | — |
| End of study | Entacapone (500) | ZNS (50) | Amantadine (100) | — | ZNS (50) | — |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 70 | 48 | 26 | 82 | 33 | 91 |
| End of study | 60 | 69 | 61 | 110 | 47 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 12 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 3 | 31 |
| End of study | 8 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 5 | 38 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 9 | 11 | 5 | 25 | 4 | 30 |
| End of study | 10 | 15 | 11 | 37 | 5 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 49 | 35 | 13 | 35 | 26 | 24 |
| End of study | 39 | 46 | 36 | 59 | 37 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Right | 5.4 | 1.82 | 5.76 | 2.21 | 1.87 | 5.21 |
| Left | 6.19 | 1.83 | 6.04 | 2.73 | 1.86 | 4.43 |
| AI % | 13.7 | 0.3 | 4.7 | 21.1 | 0.6 | 16.2 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Right | 2.44 | 1.31 | 4.87 | NA | NA | 4.04 |
| Left | 2.94 | 0.7 | 5.37 | NA | NA | 4.23 |
| AI % | 18.6 | 60.5 | 9.8 | NA | NA | 4.5 |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 55 | 16 | 82 | 92 | 29 | 76 |
| End of study | 40 | 62 | 40 | 79 | NA | NA |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 26 | 19 | 21 | 10 | 19 | NA |
| End of study | 28 | 13 | 22 | NA | NA | NA |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 28 | 23 | 26 | 16 | 20 | 20 |
| End of study | 30 | 20 | 23 | NA | NA | NA |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 15 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 8 | NA |
| End of study | 17 | 3 | 15 | NA | NA | NA |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 3 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 6 |
| End of study | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | NA | NA |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 84 | 114 | 94 | NA | NA | NA |
| End of study | 100 | 85 | 98 | NA | NA | NA |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 69 | 65 | 87 | NA | NA | NA |
| End of the study | 101 | 53 | 90 | NA | NA | NA |
|
| ||||||
| WAIS total IQ | ||||||
| Baseline | 74 | 91 | 93 | NA | NA | NA |
| End of study | 100 | 67 | 94 | NA | NA | NA |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 7 | 4 | 14 | NA | NA | NA |
| End of study | 6 | 0 | 12 | NA | NA | NA |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 4 | 2 | 10 | NA | NA | NA |
| End of study | 4 | 0 | 7 | NA | NA | NA |
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Baseline | 1 | 4 | 1 | NA | NA | 0 |
| End of study | 0 | 19 | 1 | NA | NA | 0 |
PD: Parkinson's disease, MDS-UPDRS: Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, SBR: specific binding ratio, DAT: dopamine transporter, PDQ-39-J: Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 Japan, Moca-J: Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Japan, MMSE: Mini Mental Scale Examination, FAB: Frontal Assessment Battery, RBDQ-JP: Japanese version of the REM sleep behaviour disorder questionnaire, WAIS: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. AI: asymmetry index, PRX-ER: pramipexole extended release, ROP-CR: ropinirole-controlled release, RTP: rotigotine transdermal patch, ZNS: zonisamide, and NA: not applicable.
Figure 1Follow-up findings. (a) Total Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), (b) daily levodopa dose, and (c) average specific binding ratio of dopamine transporter imaging.
The NPI (Neuropsychiatric Inventory) subitems manifested in each patient and changes in these items from baseline to the end of the study.
| Case | Subitem | Baseline | End of study | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | Severity | total | Frequency | Severity | total | ||
| 1 | Agitation/Aggression | 3 | 1 | 7/120 | 1 | 2 | 6/120 |
| Dysphoria/Depression | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
| Irritability/Lability | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||
|
| |||||||
| 2 | Apathy/Indifference | 2 | 2 | 4/120 | 0 | 0 | 0/120 |
|
| |||||||
| 3 | Delusions | 1 | 2 | 14/120 | 0 | 0 | 12/120 |
| Hallucinations | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Dysphoria/Depression | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |||
| Apathy/Indifference | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Anxiety | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | |||
Figure 2Dopamine transporter imaging. (a) Baseline imaging of Case 1, (b) 5th year imaging of Case 1, (c) baseline imaging of Case 2, and (d) 5th-year imaging of Case 2.