| Literature DB >> 29478082 |
Hiroshi Matsuda1, Miho Murata2, Yohei Mukai2, Kazuya Sako3, Hidetoshi Ono4, Hiroshi Toyama5, Yoshitaka Inui5, Yasuyuki Taki6, Hideo Shimomura6, Hiroshi Nagayama7, Amane Tateno8, Kenjiro Ono9, Hidetomo Murakami9, Atsushi Kono10,11, Shigeki Hirano12, Satoshi Kuwabara12, Norihide Maikusa13, Masayo Ogawa13, Etsuko Imabayashi13, Noriko Sato14, Harumasa Takano13, Jun Hatazawa15, Ryosuke Takahashi16.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this multicenter trial was to generate a [123I]FP-CIT SPECT database of healthy controls from the common SPECT systems available in Japan.Entities:
Keywords: Dopamine transporter; Multicenter trial; Normal database; SPECT; [123I]FP-CIT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29478082 PMCID: PMC5993845 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-3976-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Details of the healthy controls recruited in each center and the SPECT system used for imaging
| Center | Men ( | Women ( | Age (years) | Combinations of SPECT scanner + Collimators | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range | Combination of first scan (no. of subjects) | Combination of second scan (no. of subjects) | |||
| Chiba | 9 | 21 | 64 ± 23 | 41–82 | GE Infinia + ELEGP (18) | GE Infinia + LEHR (18) |
| Toyoake | 14 | 22 | 70 ± 6 | 55–82 | Toshiba 9300R + fan-beam (36) | Siemens Symbia T6 or T16 + LMEGP (36) |
| Kobe | 25 | 3 | 38 ± 7 | 30–63 | GE Optima NM/CT 640 + ELEGP (19) | Toshiba ECAM + LMEGP (18) |
| Sapporo | 20 | 20 | 61 ± 12 | 38–83 | Toshiba 9300R + fan-beam (40) | Toshiba ECAM + LMEGP (40) |
| Tokyo (Kodaira) | 19 | 21 | 55 ± 27 | 30–81 | Siemens Symbia T6 + LMEGP (23) | GE Discovery NM/CT 670 pro+ ELEGP (23) |
| Tokyo (Shinagawa) | 10 | 16 | 52 ± 27 | 35–83 | Toshiba 9300R + fan-beam (26) | GE Discovery NM/CT 670 + LEHR (26) |
| Tokyo (Bunkyo) | 14 | 16 | 57 ± 14 | 31–79 | GE Infinia + LEHR (28) | Philips BrightView + Cardiac High Resolution (27) |
| Sendai | 5 | 21 | 58 ± 12 | 30–72 | Siemens Symbia + LMEGP (13) | GE Infinia + LEHR (13) |
| Total | 116 | 140 | 57 ± 15 | 30–83 | ||
LEHR low-energy high-resolution, LMEGP low- to medium-energy general-purpose, ELEGP extended low-energy general-purpose, SD standard deviation
The numbers refer to the subjects and scans included in the analysis of the SPECT data
Fig. 1SPECT image of a striatal phantom containing different 123I activity concentrations between striatal compartments and the background. Striatal SBRs were estimated by the Southampton method
Fig. 2Measured SBRs of SPECT data of a phantom by the Southampton method plotted against the true SBR from measurements of aliquots by a well counter for the Toshiba GCA9300A (a), Philips Bright View (b), Siemens Symbia T6 (c), and GE Discovery MN/CT 670 (d). The linear regression lines are displayed for each reconstruction condition, namely, ChangACSC, ChangACNOSC, CTACSC, CTACNOSC, and NOACNOSC. Also shown is the line of identity (in gray). Similarly high correlations were also obtained between the measured SBR and true SBR in other SPECT scanners
Correlation of original and calibrated SBRs and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between NOACNOSC (X-axis) and other reconstruction conditions (Y-axis) in healthy controls
| Reconstruction conditions | Number of SPECT scans | Average SBR | Range (min, max) | Linear regression equation | ICC (ρ) | 95% confidence interval of ICC (ρ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original | ||||||
| CTACSC | 292 | 9.12 | 4.41, 14.31 | Y = 1.200X + 2.334 | 0.438 | −0.096, 0.781 |
| ChangACSC | 510 | 10.48 | 5.41, 19.08 | Y = 1.445X + 2.138 | 0.333 | −0.075, 0.698 |
| CTACNOSC | 292 | 6.72 | 3.32, 11.46 | Y = 0.996X + 1.091 | 0.860 | −0.126, 0.963 |
| ChangACNOSC | 510 | 7.09 | 3.40, 12.21 | Y = 1.121X + 0.618 | 0.808 | −0.159, 0.945 |
| NOACNOSC | 510 | 5.77 | 2.18, 10.94 | NA | NA | NA |
| Calibrated | ||||||
| CTACSC | 292 | 8.96 | 4.37, 13.76 | Y = 1.053X + 0.517 | 0.832 | 0.372, 0.928 |
| ChangACSC | 510 | 9.31 | 4.10, 17.05 | Y = 1.103X + 0.297 | 0.820 | 0.222, 0.928 |
| CTACNOSC | 292 | 7.63 | 3.35, 11.83 | Y = 0.825X + 1.011 | 0.926 | 0.839, 0.959 |
| ChangACNOSC | 510 | 7.95 | 3.97, 14.66 | Y = 0.927X + 0.380 | 0.958 | 0.940, 0.969 |
| NOACNOSC | 510 | 8.16 | 3.81, 13.89 | NA | NA | NA |
CTACSC computed tomography attenuation correction with scatter correction, ChangACSC Chang attenuation correction with scatter correction, CTACNOSC computed tomography attenuation correction without scatter correction, ChangACNOSC Chang attenuation correction without scatter correction, NOACNOSC without attenuation or scatter correction
Fig. 3Quantitative SPECT images before and after phantom calibration in a young healthy control under different reconstruction conditions. The original SBRs before calibration ranged widely from 8.75 in NOACNOSC to 15.59 in ChangACSC. In contrast, the calibrated SBRs were almost constant under NOSC conditions and somewhat higher under scatter correction conditions
Fig. 4Scatter plot of SBR as a function of age in 510 data from 256 healthy controls of both sexes. Data relevant to the average SBR for the left and right striatum are fitted by a linear regression line with 95% upper and lower confidence interval (CI) and prediction interval (PI) lines
Fig. 5Scatter plot of SBR as a function of age in 280 data from 140 women. Data relevant to the average SBR for the left and right striatum are fitted by a linear regression line with 95% upper and lower confidence interval (CI) and prediction interval (PI) lines
Fig. 6Scatter plot of SBR as a function of age in 230 data from 116 men. Data relevant to the average SBR for the left and right striatum are fitted by a linear regression line with 95% upper and lower confidence interval (CI) and prediction interval (PI) lines
Calibrated SBRs for NOACNOSC by age group
| Parameter | Age group (years) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30–39 | 40–49 | 50–59 | 60–69 | 70–79 | 80–89 | |
|
| ||||||
| Number of subjects | 45 | 43 | 39 | 71 | 48 | 10 |
| Number of scans | 90 | 86 | 78 | 142 | 95 | 19 |
| Average of left and right SBRs | 9.52 | 8.91 | 8.31 | 7.71 | 7.10 | 6.50 |
| 95% lower limit of prediction intervals | 6.82 | 6.22 | 5.62 | 5.01 | 4.41 | 3.80 |
| Interhemispheric asymmetry index | 3.59 | 3.88 | 4.17 | 4.46 | 4.75 | 5.04 |
| 95% upper limit of prediction intervals | 10.53 | 10.81 | 11.09 | 11.38 | 11.68 | 11.99 |
|
| ||||||
| Number of subjects | 30 | 15 | 17 | 31 | 18 | 5 |
| Number of scans | 60 | 30 | 34 | 62 | 35 | 9 |
| Average of left and right SBRs | 9.01 | 8.53 | 8.05 | 7.57 | 7.09 | 6.61 |
| 95% lower limit of prediction intervals | 6.36 | 5.89 | 5.41 | 4.93 | 4.44 | 3.95 |
| Interhemispheric asymmetry index | 3.40 | 3.93 | 4.46 | 4.98 | 5.51 | 6.04 |
| 95% upper limit of prediction intervals | 10.58 | 11.09 | 11.61 | 12.14 | 12.69 | 13.25 |
|
| ||||||
| Number of subjects | 15 | 28 | 22 | 40 | 30 | 5 |
| Number of scans | 30 | 56 | 44 | 80 | 60 | 10 |
| Average of left and right SBRs | 10.11 | 9.35 | 8.58 | 7.82 | 7.06 | 6.30 |
| 95% lower limit of prediction intervals | 7.46 | 6.71 | 5.95 | 5.18 | 4.42 | 3.64 |
| Interhemispheric asymmetry index | 3.81 | 3.91 | 4.00 | 4.10 | 4.20 | 4.30 |
| 95% upper limit of prediction intervals | 10.55 | 10.62 | 10.71 | 10.81 | 10.92 | 11.05 |
Univariate analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis of 510 DAT SPECT in healthy volunteers
|
| ||||
| Between-subject effects | Degrees of freedom | Mean square | F | p-value |
| Sex | 1 | 27.712 | 2.256 | 0.134 |
| Age | 1 | 103.041 | 8.390 | 0.004 |
| Sex × age | 1 | 49.038 | 3.993 | 0.046 |
| Scan start time | 1 | 0.193 | 0.16 | 0.900 |
| Error | 505 | 12.281 | ||
| R2 = 0.028 (R2adj = 0.020) | ||||
|
| ||||
| Model | B (unstandardized coefficient) | t | p-value | |
| (Constant) | 10.610 | 22.134 | < 0.001 | |
| Age | −0.063 | −15.18 | < 0.001 | |
| Scan start time | 0.263 | 2.024 | 0.043 | |
| Sex | 0.461 | 3.819 | < 0.001 | |
The dependent variable is the average SBR for the right and left striatum. Independent variables are sex, age, and scan start time
Fig. 7Scatter plot of the asymmetry index (AI) between the right and left striatal SBR as a function of age in 510 data from 256 healthy controls of both sexes. Data relevant to the AI of the striatal SBR are fitted by a linear regression line with a 95% upper prediction interval (PI) line
Univariate analysis of variance and multiple regression analysis of 510 DAT SPECT in healthy volunteers
|
| ||||
| Between-subject effects | Degrees of freedom | Mean square | F | p-value |
| Sex | 1 | 27.712 | 2.256 | 0.134 |
| Age | 1 | 103.041 | 8.390 | 0.004 |
| Sex × age | 1 | 49.038 | 3.993 | 0.046 |
| Scan start time | 1 | 0.193 | 0.16 | 0.900 |
| Error | 505 | 12.281 | ||
| R2 = 0.028 (R2adj = 0.020) | ||||
|
| ||||
| Model | B (unstandardized coefficient) | t | p-value | |
| (Constant) | 2.885 | 2.306 | 0.022 | |
| Age | 0.031 | 2.875 | 0.004 | |
| Scan start time | −0.037 | −0.108 | 0.914 | |
| Sex | −0.546 | −1.731 | 0.084 | |
The dependent variable is the asymmetric index (AI) of the SBR for the right and left striatum. Independent variables are sex, age, and scan start time