BACKGROUND: Alterations in striatal dopamine neurotransmission are central to the emergence of psychotic symptoms and to the mechanism of action of antipsychotics. Although the functional integrity of the presynaptic system can be assessed by measuring striatal dopamine synthesis capacity (DSC), no quantitative meta-analysis is available. METHODS: Eleven striatal (caudate and putamen) [(11)C/(18)F]-DOPA positron emission tomography studies comparing 113 patients with schizophrenia and 131 healthy controls were included in a quantitative meta-analysis of DSC. Demographic, clinical, and methodological variables were extracted from each study or obtained from the authors and tested as covariates. Hedges' g was used as a measure of effect size in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger's intercept. Heterogeneity was addressed with the Q statistic and I(2) index. RESULTS: Patients and controls were well matched in sociodemographic variables (P > .05). Quantitative evaluation of publication bias was nonsignificant (P = .276). Heterogeneity across study was modest in magnitude and statistically nonsignificant (Q = 19.19; P = .078; I (2) = 39.17). Patients with schizophrenia showed increased striatal DSC as compared with controls (Hedges' g = 0.867, CI 95% from 0.594 to 1.140, Z = 6.222, P < .001). The DSC schizophrenia/control ratio showed a relatively homogenous elevation of around 14% in schizophrenic patients as compared with controls. DSC elevation was regionally confirmed in both caudate and putamen. Controlling for potential confounders such as age, illness duration, gender, psychotic symptoms, and exposure to antipsychotics had no impact on the results. Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of meta-analytic findings. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis showed consistently increased striatal DSC in schizophrenia, with a 14% elevation in patients as compared with healthy controls.
BACKGROUND: Alterations in striatal dopamine neurotransmission are central to the emergence of psychotic symptoms and to the mechanism of action of antipsychotics. Although the functional integrity of the presynaptic system can be assessed by measuring striatal dopamine synthesis capacity (DSC), no quantitative meta-analysis is available. METHODS: Eleven striatal (caudate and putamen) [(11)C/(18)F]-DOPA positron emission tomography studies comparing 113 patients with schizophrenia and 131 healthy controls were included in a quantitative meta-analysis of DSC. Demographic, clinical, and methodological variables were extracted from each study or obtained from the authors and tested as covariates. Hedges' g was used as a measure of effect size in Comprehensive Meta-Analysis. Publication bias was assessed with funnel plots and Egger's intercept. Heterogeneity was addressed with the Q statistic and I(2) index. RESULTS:Patients and controls were well matched in sociodemographic variables (P > .05). Quantitative evaluation of publication bias was nonsignificant (P = .276). Heterogeneity across study was modest in magnitude and statistically nonsignificant (Q = 19.19; P = .078; I (2) = 39.17). Patients with schizophrenia showed increased striatal DSC as compared with controls (Hedges' g = 0.867, CI 95% from 0.594 to 1.140, Z = 6.222, P < .001). The DSC schizophrenia/control ratio showed a relatively homogenous elevation of around 14% in schizophrenicpatients as compared with controls. DSC elevation was regionally confirmed in both caudate and putamen. Controlling for potential confounders such as age, illness duration, gender, psychotic symptoms, and exposure to antipsychotics had no impact on the results. Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness of meta-analytic findings. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis showed consistently increased striatal DSC in schizophrenia, with a 14% elevation in patients as compared with healthy controls.
Authors: R Smieskova; P Fusar-Poli; P Allen; K Bendfeldt; R D Stieglitz; J Drewe; E W Radue; P K McGuire; A Riecher-Rössler; S J Borgwardt Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2010-02-06 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Lakshmi N Yatham; Peter F Liddle; I-Shin Shiah; Raymond W Lam; Elton Ngan; Gayle Scarrow; Miguel Imperial; Jon Stoessl; Vesna Sossi; Thomas J Ruth Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-04-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Robert S Miletich; Philip D Kohn; Giuseppe Esposito; Richard E Carson; Mario Quarantelli; Daniel R Weinberger; Karen Faith Berman Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Gerhard Gründer; Ingo Vernaleken; Matthias J Müller; Eugen Davids; Nilufar Heydari; Hans-Georg Buchholz; Peter Bartenstein; Ole L Munk; Peter Stoeter; Dean F Wong; Albert Gjedde; Paul Cumming Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2002-10-30 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Karoline Schneider; Lars Michels; Matthias N Hartmann-Riemer; Achim Burrer; Philippe N Tobler; Philipp Stämpfli; Matthias Kirschner; Erich Seifritz; Stefan Kaiser Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Vilte E Barakauskas; Annie Moradian; Alasdair M Barr; Clare L Beasley; Gorazd Rosoklija; J John Mann; Boro Ilievski; Aleksandar Stankov; Andrew J Dwork; Peter Falkai; Gregg B Morin; William G Honer Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 4.939