Literature DB >> 3568610

Hearing in passerine and psittacine birds: a comparative study of absolute and masked auditory thresholds.

K Okanoya, R J Dooling.   

Abstract

Operant conditioning and a psychophysical tracking procedure were used to measure auditory thresholds for pure tones in quiet and in noise for seven species of small birds--the budgerigar, canary, cockatiel, European starling, song sparrow, swamp sparrow, and the zebra finch. Audibility curves are roughly similar among the seven birds, with the maximum sensitivity between 2 and 5 kHz and poorer sensitivity outside this narrow region. Critical ratios (signal-to-noise ratio at masked threshold) were calculated from pure-tone thresholds in noise. Except for the budgerigar, the critical ratio functions of all birds increase at the rate of 3 dB/octave. This pattern is typical of that observed in most vertebrates. Critical ratios in the budgerigar, on the other hand, decrease gradually from 0.5 kHz to 2.8 kHz and increase dramatically above 2.8 kHz. The present research demonstrates that the critical ratio function for the budgerigar is not only different from other vertebrates but also different from other birds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3568610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  45 in total

1.  Development of auditory sensitivity of altricial birds: absolute thresholds of the generation of evoked potentials.

Authors:  L I Aleksandrov; L P Dmitrieva
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr

2.  Temporal and rate code analysis of responses to low-frequency components in the bird's own song by song system neurons.

Authors:  Makoto Fukushima; Peter L Rauske; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Sound representation methods for spectro-temporal receptive field estimation.

Authors:  Patrick Gill; Junli Zhang; Sarah M N Woolley; Thane Fremouw; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Linear and nonlinear auditory response properties of interneurons in a high-order avian vocal motor nucleus during wakefulness.

Authors:  Jonathan N Raksin; Christopher M Glaze; Sarah Smith; Marc F Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Mechanisms of song perception in oscine birds.

Authors:  Daniel P Knudsen; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  High-frequency auditory feedback is not required for adult song maintenance in Bengalese finches.

Authors:  S M Woolley; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Anesthetic state modulates excitability but not spectral tuning or neural discrimination in single auditory midbrain neurons.

Authors:  Joseph W Schumacher; David M Schneider; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Masked auditory thresholds in three species of birds, as measured by the auditory brainstem response (L).

Authors:  Isabelle C Noirot; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Recovery of hearing and vocal behavior after hair-cell regeneration.

Authors:  R J Dooling; B M Ryals; K Manabe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Effects of selective auditory-nerve damage on the behavioral audiogram and temporal integration in the budgerigar.

Authors:  Stephanie J Wong; Kristina S Abrams; Kassidy N Amburgey; Yingxuan Wang; Kenneth S Henry
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.